untitled
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2008
- Messages
- 7,516
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
One billion people still stuck in the 1962.
Move on with your life.
Hafizzz is back
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One billion people still stuck in the 1962.
Move on with your life.
Like your name suggests you are peaceful by nature and have some great thoughts thank you for sharing them and explaining to Indians.
Why do so many Chinese and Pakistanis even speak with India in the same breath as China. It is flattering for Indians. It would be more meaningful to compare Indian prowess against smaller countries maybe like Nepal and then they can look good
Practice what you preach. back to topic. Indians have not learned their lesson. They need some more corrective therapy
We are waiting for the corrective therapy which will never come.
Just be patient China and Pakistan will in due course break up India into 34 countries for the sake of peace in our neighbourhood. You have forgotten 1962 spanking haven't you?
hahaha..nice try to bait...You know who has done the breaking right.. your posts are all amusing..i like it.
Just be patient China and Pakistan will in due course .....
i think before we remember 1962 where pak had no part, you should reflect on 1971 before you go about saying you will break up india.
Like always you cant resist trolling...Hinduvata and 1962...very deep connection indeed. again, LOL.
patience ..... !!!!
We've got bored ... waiting and waiting for what China and Pakistan will do in due course.....
I think your "secret strategy" is to kill us due to boredom.
How to plan against such a potent strategy.
Mate this thread is about the famous Chinese spanking of India. If you want to go off topic or go and start another thread. can you not read the thread title?????
Circles within circles. Hindutva forcing people to live a certain way of life. People in neighbourhood not happy-Nehru want to introduce forward policy to some Chinese to enforce hindutva so Chinese teach Indians to behave in 1962-simple really
i think before we remember 1962 where pak had no part, you should reflect on 1971 before you go about saying you will break up india.
Claude Arpi: Zhou was ready to accept the McMahon LineTo Mr. U Nu
Prime Minister of Burma
New Delhi
22 April 1957
My dear U Nu,
I have received today your letter of the 17th April 1957, with its enclosures.
Thank you for it.
I shall have the matters referred to in your letter examined by the Historical Section of the External Affairs Ministry. In case I can give you any useful information about them, I shall do so in a later communication.
I am sorry that there has been so much difficulty in your arriving at a settlement about border problems with the Chinese Government. I confess that I do not very much like the attitude of Premier Chou En-lai in this matter. The impression created upon me is that he was not fully adhering to what he had told you or U Ba Swe [previous Prime Minister] previously. But this is for you to judge.
I am writing to you immediately so as to inform you of one particular development which took place here when Chou En-lai came to India on the last occasion. In your letter you say that while Premier Chou En-lai was prepared to accept the McMahon Line in the north, he objected to the use of the name "McMahon Line", as this may produce "complications vis-a-vis India", and therefore, he preferred to use the term "traditional line".
When Chou En-lai was here last, we discussed many matters at great length. He referred to his talks with you and U Ba Swe and indicated that a satisfactory arrangement had been arrived at. In this connection he said that while he was not convinced of the justice of our claim to the present Indian frontier with China (in Tibet), he was prepared to accept it. That is, he made it clear that he accepted the McMahon Line between India and China, chiefly because of his desire to settle outstanding matters with a friendly country like India and also because of usage etc. I think, he added he did not like the name "McMahon Line".
This statement that he made to me orally was important from our point of view and so I wanted to remove all doubts about it. I asked him again therefore and he repeated it quite clearly. I expressed my satisfaction at what he said. I added that there were two or three minor frontier matters pending between India and China on the Tibet border and the sooner these were settled, the better. He agreed.
I entirely agree that the use of the word "McMahon Line" is not right and should be put an end to. It reminds one of British incursions and aggression. We are, therefore, not using these words any longer. Indeed, so far as we are concerned, we have maintained all along that our frontier with China, except for the two or three very minor matters, was a fixed and well known frontier and there was no dispute about it. We had never raised this question with China, but I had stated in Parliament here and also to Chou En-lai in Peking that there was nothing to discuss about our frontier as it was fixed and well known. We have now our check-posts all along this frontier.
Thus, so far as we are concerned, this frontier (known previously as the McMahon Line) is not a matter in dispute at all and Chou En-lai has accepted it. It is true that his acceptance was oral, but it was quite clear and precise.
As regards the two or three minor matters, we are expecting some Chinese representatives to come to Delhi fairly soon to discuss one of them. The territory involved is a very small one in the high mountains. We do not propose to raise the other two small matters at this stage. After one question is settled, we might, if we think proper then, refer to the other two.
I am writing to you immediately in answer to your letter so as to keep you informed about this so-called McMahon Line between India and Tibet and what Chou En-lai said to me on this subject, This has some relevance to your own McMahon Line.
...
With all good wishes,
Yours sincerely,
Jawaharlal Nehru
India's government needs to move on to plutonium based weapons, then scrap the no first use doctrine. Once enough ICBM's are pointed at the major cities of China, India can then do what Pakistan does to India, which is carry our foreign policy under a nuclear umbrella. If China then invades and conventional forces cannot hold them back, mutually assured destruction in the form of a nuclear holocaust will ensue.
In this situation Chinese aggression is less likely than it is today.
Well you were given a taster in Bombay for which you blamed us but didn't have the balls to do anything about. That relieved the boredom for some of you didn't it