IceCold
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- May 1, 2007
- Messages
- 19,236
- Reaction score
- 10
- Country
- Location
https://tribune.com.pk/article/8153...dly-surrendering-to-indias-khalistan-movementWhen did he make this decision?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
https://tribune.com.pk/article/8153...dly-surrendering-to-indias-khalistan-movementWhen did he make this decision?
Fair enough but Pakistan is still accused for it whether we are backing it or not.If a Khalistan movement headquarters itself in Pakistan and runs operations through there the movement loses legitimacy as it would appear to be a Pakistani intelligence operation rather than something organic
Done my friend.Yaar, post this also in PLA liberated....... thread!
If you consider after independence i.e from 1947, then no we have only added more territory to our union.
But in historical context, we have lost more than 50% territory.
We can consider everything from Afghanistan to Burma in the India empire (erstwhile).
We can in theory claim Central Asia, some parts of Iran, Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Malaysia and some parts of Indonesia (thanks to chola empire)
Yeah yeah thats why thousands were massacred in Delhi and Akal takht. Trust me they will never forget these atrocities.
View attachment 648020
Fair enough but Pakistan is still accused for it whether we are backing it or not.
https://www.thequint.com/voices/opi...ce-italy-pakistan-jihad-networks-punjab-india
And i highly doubt if it matter to Sikhs anymore who supports them. Besides recognizing this movement will rattle Indians enough to understand the cost of their adventure in Balochistan. We cannot just remain to Kashmir which is already a disputed territory and to whiom Indians have started equating Balochistan with, which is neither a disputed territory by any standards nor is there any movement of independence going on. Still they do it and openly support terrorist organisations like BLA. Why cant we?
who cares for aksai chin ? we got Hyderabad, Kashmir goa junagarh , we are happy with that .And who lost aksai chin in 62?
yeah they love what happened to them in 1947 .Sikhs find more solace with Pakistan than India. Most of their heritage is in our territories. Its about time they should rise up against Indian hegemony and quit serving their armed forces. A beautiful nostalgic song by some Sikh singers below.
sikhs are indian first then sikh .While many sikhs may look away from atrocities committed against them in the past, the current diversion of their water supply may grab their attention. Especially if it is for a untenable plan to send the water to the Rajasthan desert.
If you consider after independence i.e from 1947, then no we have only added more territory to our union.
But in historical context, we have lost more than 50% territory.
We can consider everything from Afghanistan to Burma in the India empire (erstwhile).
We can in theory claim Central Asia, some parts of Iran, Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Malaysia and some parts of Indonesia (thanks to chola empire)
what do you want ?I have met many of these Khalistan Sikhs. They can only talk tough inside their safe sanctuaries of UK, US, Canada, Australia. They do not have the courage to follow through on their threats of secession. Sirf geedar bhabki aur kuch nahi.
The 70's and 80's Sikhs were a different matter. They were better organized and more dedicated to the cause of Khalistan.