that is true, sikhs like army job .10% of indian army is Sikh
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
that is true, sikhs like army job .10% of indian army is Sikh
sikhs are indian first then sikh .
whole india in one .no wastage of water .wasting water is still wasting water. If it is at the expense of the Sikhs and other Punjabis it can become more of a sore point over time.
count at least 20 crore khalistanis .So what is the latest count of this referendum? Any updates on when this separate state is being inaugurated?
Obviously on PDF, Khalistan is already a separate country with its own passport, currency and embassy...that is a given lol
@FOOLS_NIGHTMARE
count at least 20 crore khalistanis .
jai khalistan .
india was already dismembered and ripped to shreds without mercy on August the 14th 1947 when it lost over 35% of it's territory in the creation of Pakistan..........
If you consider after independence i.e from 1947, then no we have only added more territory to our union.
But in historical context, we have lost more than 50% territory.
We can consider everything from Afghanistan to Burma in the India empire (erstwhile).
We can in theory claim Central Asia, some parts of Iran, Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Malaysia and some parts of Indonesia (thanks to chola empire)
only an indian would be proud of slicing an already sliced bharat mata into more slices in exchange for a slap on the left indian buttcheck followed by a bengali money shot in the indian face for a "thank you"!Thank you , and we sliced that too..
india was already dismembered and ripped to shreds without mercy on August the 14th 1947 when it lost over 35% of it's territory in the creation of Pakistan..........
incorrect. the ideology of a geographical "india" has always been there for centuries if not millenniums. even ancient traders would identify themselves as traders from "hind" and not some kingdom or fifdom.That's factually incorrect statement. British raj got divided on 1947. India never in history was a country. So india never lost no territory on 1947. Pakistan did loose her territory. It's important to remember that and be honest towards oneself...only then Pakistan can make proper policies.
incorrect. the ideology of a geographical "india" has always been there for centuries if not millenniums. even ancient traders would identify themselves as traders from "hind" and not some kingdom or fifdom.
Pakistan lost its territory due to its own mistakes regardless of how much credit indians try to take. no one else in the world gives them credit because everyone is aware of the fact that a minority just can't hold on to the majority ESPECIALLY when the majority is a 1000 miles away.
well, for one thing, there are ahadith that mention "hind"...'enuf said. secondly, the concept of nation states is only a century or so old, before that, it was the age of empires. so at best, one can only say that there was no "nation state of india" before 1947 and nothing more.there is a difference between region and a country. There is nothing called "ideological geographical india". If so quote some those centuries old references.
well, for one thing, there are ahadith that mention "hind"...'enuf said. secondly, the concept of nation states is only a century or so old, before that, it was the age of empires. so at best, one can only say that there was no "nation state of india" before 1947 and nothing more.
That's factually incorrect statement. British raj got divided on 1947. India never in history was a country. So india never lost no territory on 1947. Pakistan did loose her territory. It's important to remember that and be honest towards oneself...only then Pakistan can make proper policies.