siegecrossbow
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2010
- Messages
- 7,414
- Reaction score
- 8
- Country
- Location
more advanced in what way?
For starters internal weapons bay.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
more advanced in what way?
more advanced in what way?
Good question this is what I will also like to know
No weapons bay, no zig-saw treatment of panels on the aircraft skin, and what appears to be exposed spherical IRST (I could be wrong about that). On the other hand the F-414s are way superior to equivalent engines fielded by PLAAF.
Weapon bay for block 2, no need to redesigned, it has been designed with weapon bay in mind
I’m only comparing with block 1.
Block 1 and Block 2 KFX has its own advantages and disadvantage, it will depend on the mission. Block 1 has much better range than block 2 which is needed for large countries like Indonesia. Not only due to 2 additional fuel tanks, but the room intended for weapon bay might be used for fuel tank as well in block 1.
Block 1 also still be able to be quite Stealthy with 4 missiles in its belly. It is semi weapon bay.
View attachment 724099
It lacks DSI used on JF-17.
Will there be stealth coating?
LOL a bump in intake make you so crazy about .......
DSI is appealing to the eye. Also more aerodynamic, lighter weight, no servicing required.
Later we will be able to compare its flight performance like range and speeds with J 31 inshaAllah.
J-10, F-35, J-31, J-20, JF-17 all use DSI. It is new technology. Completely different from traditional intake design. Think quantum computer compared to digital computer.