Don't bother; he'll never learn.
You can't take the curl out of a dog's tail. Old Indian saying.
Good ... You defined your entire life in single sentence.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't bother; he'll never learn.
You can't take the curl out of a dog's tail. Old Indian saying.
No, but the question is, are you? If not, are you bad-mouthing India with your employer's permission? Would he like it if he were asked if he knew what you are doing?
Good ... You defined your entire life in single sentence.
@masterchief_mirza @PAKISTANFOREVER @Pan-Islamic-Pakistan @Verve @Mangus Ortus Novem
When at school a learnt a story based around King Solomon..........
Two single mothers were sharing a room, and each gave birth to a baby boy at about the same time. During the night, one of the mothers had accidentally turned over and smothered her son. When she awoke early and saw her child was cold and still, the distraught woman took her roommate's sleeping baby to herself and laid her dead baby in its place. Later the other mother awoke, saw the dead baby, and began to wail with grief. But after examining the infant, she quickly realized that it was not her child. Across the room, she could see her roommate tightly clutching her baby.
Now both women stood before the king, tugging for possession of the living infant. "This child is mine!" one shouted.
"No, the dead baby was yours!" the other countered.
How would the king determine which was the true mother? Solomon interrupted their debate and told a guard to take a sword and divide the living infant in two. At first the soldier thought the king was jesting, but Solomon began to glare at the guard's hesitation. Slowly he drew his sharp, gleaming sword and made his way toward the woman holding the baby. Suddenly the true mother threw herself at the king's feet and pleaded,?"Let her have the child, but please do not slay it!" But the other woman said, "Let it be neither mine nor thine, but divide it." Now Solomon knew without a doubt who was the true mother.
In this scenario the baby is Kashmir. Anyone with any love for Kashmir and Kashmiri people would allow the fate be decided by Kashmiri people. Whether the people of the soil decide India or Pakistan i along with ANY Kashmiri people would be fine and dandy. Anyone who objects to this simply doesn't give a hoot about the people or the soil of Kashmir and would rather see it obliterated into fragments. They would rather the baby be slayed then allow the real Kashmir voice to be heard.
Indeed. Their hatred has consumed them completely.@masterchief_mirza @PAKISTANFOREVER @Pan-Islamic-Pakistan @Verve @Mangus Ortus Novem
When at school a learnt a story based around King Solomon..........
Two single mothers were sharing a room, and each gave birth to a baby boy at about the same time. During the night, one of the mothers had accidentally turned over and smothered her son. When she awoke early and saw her child was cold and still, the distraught woman took her roommate's sleeping baby to herself and laid her dead baby in its place. Later the other mother awoke, saw the dead baby, and began to wail with grief. But after examining the infant, she quickly realized that it was not her child. Across the room, she could see her roommate tightly clutching her baby.
Now both women stood before the king, tugging for possession of the living infant. "This child is mine!" one shouted.
"No, the dead baby was yours!" the other countered.
How would the king determine which was the true mother? Solomon interrupted their debate and told a guard to take a sword and divide the living infant in two. At first the soldier thought the king was jesting, but Solomon began to glare at the guard's hesitation. Slowly he drew his sharp, gleaming sword and made his way toward the woman holding the baby. Suddenly the true mother threw herself at the king's feet and pleaded,?"Let her have the child, but please do not slay it!" But the other woman said, "Let it be neither mine nor thine, but divide it." Now Solomon knew without a doubt who was the true mother.
In this scenario the baby is Kashmir. Anyone with any love for Kashmir and Kashmiri people would allow the fate be decided by Kashmiri people. Whether the people of the soil decide India or Pakistan i along with ANY Kashmiri people would be fine and dandy. Anyone who objects to this simply doesn't give a hoot about the people or the soil of Kashmir and would rather see it obliterated into fragments. They would rather the baby be slayed then allow the real Kashmir voice to be heard.
may be true for few kashmiris .Even Indians do not accept Kashmiris as anything except Pakistanis, that is how they treat them.
Jeo what's morality about it?In no way does it override the rights of residents of that part of the country.
There is no question of political correctness, just of legal rights and moral law.
But of course, that doesn't matter; you voted for the BJP.
Jeo what's morality about it?
Half of Kolkata's/Mumbai/Delhi/Bangalore population is not from there. So these migrants doesn't have right there?
I don't feel my rights are curbed in Kolkata. Why would the right of Kashmiris be curbed?
Why I being an Indian citizen not have right to buy a property in valleys of Kashmir to settle down.
Out of 6 constituencies 3 belongs to BJP. Technically half wants what BJP wants.
Why?
Who gave your 1.3 billion people, a highly questionable and entirely stupid figure, the right to decide individual faith?
Sir ask him to read more about article 371 and variius parts of it.The lack of morality is in insisting on the Muslim majority in Kashmir being asked to do what you do not ask the Hindu Majority in Himachal or in Uttarakhand, or the Buddhist majority in Sikkim, or in Arunachal, or the Christian majority in Mizoram, or Meghalaya to do.
Do try to figure out where I'm coming from before bashing me up. That would save me from a lot of lumps from zealous young idiots (not you; I was looking to the left over your shoulder) who go off half-cocked.
Article 371 – Maharashtra and Gujarat
Other than Nagaland and AP you can buy rural properties as well if you have a job/create job in those respective states. For Nagaland and AP not even everybody from the state itself can buy land everywhere just like the restriction in buying tribal lands of WB, JH, CH, MP. As we say ILP is getting eased in those states.
For HP anyone can buy property anywhere, you need to know the trick. And those who buys knows it.I just saw your post, and will look up the references in the statute-books relating to the other states tomorrow. Surely, running a real-estate portal, you must be aware of the restrictions on the acquisition of property in Himachal, for example, by non-residents of HP.