Well, if we go through history of Indo Pak conflicts, we will realise that all four wars between them were a result of "surprise" hidden stabs by Pakistan.
1947 invasion of Kashmir when Kashmir acceded to India.
1965 infiltration of military to cut off Kashmir from India (ended up celebrating Indian withdrawal from Pakistani territory later, lol)
1971 attempt to bomb Indian bases in Kashmir
1999 attempt to covertly annex Kargil.
So no, Pakistan is pioneer of unpredictable stabbing in region. What happens to it at end is a different case.
Sincerely, your expectation from a class over their rage against government might be reasonable. But overexpecting unrealistic things on basis of prejudices isn't going to affect credibility of your thesis in a positive way. Guess what Kashmiris did in 1965?
Even last year, it was India who was looking for a war and Pakistani leaders were busy convincing UNSC for intervention.
AFAIK, the conventional rule which has worked everywhere is that military with higher logistics will win in case there is an obstruction less war.
Mountains of Northwest Pakistan prevented West Pakistan while East Pakistan was not that lucky and turned Bangladesh. For same reason, US sent nuclear flottila to stop India.
Same for China who couldn't move beyond a favourable terrain in 1962. PRC pulled out of most area once Indian armed forces mobilised.
They didn't have any permanent gains later. Neither in, 1967, 1971 (yes, they hit border during Bangladesh war), 1987, 2016 or 2020. India built world's biggest mountain strike forces just after 1962.
Given that gap between armed forces of India & Pakistan has only expanded since your last attempt, it's likely that India will sweep through the Pakistan.
Logistic supplies too have a role to play here. Pakistan doesn't possess to sustain a war for week.
You didn't. You just straightforward have put a burdern of assumption on Pakistani armed forces as expeditors what neither they ever did, nor they have ability to do it by miles.
Stronger forces pierce deep inside, and that's why Pakistan has made a tonnes of military databases and doctrine to deny Indian expedition of Pakistan again like 1971 (it includes nuking your own territory too). Annexxing Indian territory is a far cry.
Well really? You just again took a variable, in fact one without iota without reason
May be Pakistani establishment is smarter than you and knows logistics and numerical superiority required for expeditions (and knows that India possesses that) as well Indian government who doesn't really take Pakistan that seriously as much you are projecting.
What you think disagrees with existing instant. And that's why Pakistan is running for third party interventions.