Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You give the same rights to your part and we can let the two parts decide their own future in accordance with the wishes of the people of J & K.
The difference is the people of Azad Kashmir have their rights and treated as Independent by Pakistan. They have their own parliament, chief justice, and President even their own Azad Kashmir regiment supported by Pakistans Army against Indian aggression. You give the same rights to your part and we can let the two parts decide their own future in accordance with the wishes of the people of J & K.
The difference is the people of Azad Kashmir have their rights and treated as Independent by Pakistan. They have their own parliament, chief justice, and President even their own Azad Kashmir regiment supported by Pakistans Army against Indian aggression. You give the same rights to your part and we can let the two parts decide their own future in accordance with the wishes of the people of J & K.
The difference is the people of Azad Kashmir have their rights and treated as Independent by Pakistan. They have their own parliament, chief justice, and President even their own Azad Kashmir regiment supported by Pakistans Army against Indian aggression. You give the same rights to your part and we can let the two parts decide their own future in accordance with the wishes of the people of J & K.
Indian soldiers serving in Kashmir are a fair kill. Use of force should however only be warranted by Pakistan Army. The use of force would be a valid method of taking Kashmir provided it can work.
look at those little kids
New Recruit
source : The Hindu : Front Page : JuD vows to take Kashmir by force
this is really a bad news considering the situation that most likely india and pak will resume tha talks by this month
Correct from the Indian point of view.Pakistani soilders serving in Pak-Occupied Kashmir are a fair kill. Use of force should however only be warranted by Indian Army. The use of force would be a valid method in taking Kashmir provided it can work.
Punjab isn't a fair target, since its not disputed territory.I read the above and laugh at myself. People talking about peace want to achieve it by the way of war. War leaves wounds so deep that the bandage of peace aint enough for them and we guys have experienced it through the many wars we have fought. Yet we havent been able to come to terms with the situation. Btw I think the theory of PA attacking Kashmir will always be a flawed one because India will hit Pakistan in Punjab and we all know that Pakistan armerd forces arent well equipped to fight across a broad front given the prominence of IAF and IN.
It is.Btw Asim , whats your stand on US troops in Afghanistan because if Kashmir isnt India's soverign land then Afghanistan can never be a soveriegn land for Taliban. If I go by your explanation then US troop surge should be a valid one.
One basic question strikes me .... J&K obviously means the whole of Jammu and Kashmir.
Including all of Ladakh.
Including all of ***.
Including all of COK.
Including LAKHS of displaced Kashmiri Pandits living all over India.
Do we have reliable Census information acceptable to all three parties of who can vote, who cannot
- India, Pakistan, and China - before a free referendum vote is held?
war should be the last option...an option only to be used when all others fail...i too accept this, 6 decade's of talks produce no results so we also try 3 wars & 1 limited war but still no result... a full fledged war only solve this problem,
If as per India or GoI the J&K is a state of India, then why the wait till now to other country that occupied it, its our right to get back the full state under GoI, but no Indian Politicians have this guts to speak like this i know?