What's new

Kashmir | News & Discussions.

So, is new media only reinforcing old stereotypes?


  • Total voters
    44
it is written that paper was set by him,so wats the deal of world largest democracy.

I think one of major pillars of democrazy is tht u have freedom of speech. and tht professor just practiced his freedom of speech and in the result the largest democrzy locked him up for using his right to speech.

Buck Up Leep it up the Good work U Indians.
 
Setting up question papers based on a persons "freedom of speech" in volatile subjects like separatism, religion cannot be tolerated.

What if he put some really nasty scenarios which are explicit and call it "its my freedom of speech"???

What if is a very big Question Mark ?.U dont have any proof for tht .
 
He must be an ISI agent, trained somewhere in the ISI camp.

ISI agent trained in JUD camp in muridkay to teach the indian students tht there army is killing innocent Muslims Kashmirs for not good reason.
 
I think one of major pillars of democrazy is tht u have freedom of speech. and tht professor just practiced his freedom of speech and in the result the largest democrzy locked him up for using his right to speech.

Buck Up Leep it up the Good work U Indians.

Democracy has its limitations and is not tolerent towards anything said in the name of freedom of speech.. Examples are comments on religion and comments that is against the integrity of nation.

Some people like to take pot shots against incident like these to satisfy their own egos.

Not so long ago, in my state a person has been attacked and removed from job on a similar incident where he insulted a religious person in a question paper.

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/66425-blood-their-hands.html

There are some limits regarding exercising "freedom of speech".. a little use of grey matter actually helps in identifying and justifying it.
 
freedom of speech do not permit anyone to comply force on others to accept it.by setting his own view in question paper is like to force his students to accept it.

This is not freedom of speech.
 
I think one of major pillars of democrazy is tht u have freedom of speech. and tht professor just practiced his freedom of speech and in the result the largest democrzy locked him up for using his right to speech.

Buck Up Leep it up the Good work U Indians.

How is it freedom of speech when he is paid to set up the question?

He must comply the rules of government when setting up the paper.
 
'Back channel diplomacy' underway with India on Kashmir: Pak

LAHORE: Pakistan has said that "back channel diplomacy" is being conducted with India to resolve the Kashmir issue.

"Back channel diplomacy with India is underway to resolve the Kashmir issue. However, we are stressing India should hold tripartite talks (with Pakistan and the Kashmiris). The Kashmiris must be involved in parleys for a peaceful solution to the conflict," Pakistan's Kashmir Affairs Minister Manzoor Ahmed Wattoo said.

Wattoo did not give details of the back channel contacts. Recent media reports in Pakistan have suggested that former Foreign Secretary Riaz Khan has been holding talks with ex-Indian envoy S K Lambah as part of the back channel contacts.

At the same time, Wattoo said that the Kashmir issue should be resolved under existing UN resolutions.

Alleging that "human rights violations are on the rise" in Kashmir, he said "the world powers should play their role in resolving the issue."

'Back channel diplomacy' underway with India on Kashmir: Pak - The Economic Times
 
This is a very good platform for going forward...good luck all
 
^^^ This is a text-book example of how the so-called secular parties routinely commit the most vile hate-crimes against Hindus. The fact is the Indian secularists often propound precisely the same conspiracy theories as Pakistani elements like Zaid Hamid (point to be noted by our "secular" friend Joe Shearer, who displays the same criminal bent of mind).

From a Rediff report:

"The Congress Party, after first distancing itself from the comments (of Antulay, the then minority affairs minister), two days later issued a contradictory statement which implicitly endorsed the conspiracy. During this time, Antulay's completely unsubstantiated claims gained support in... Indian-Muslim community," Mulford wrote in his secret cable to the State Department on December 23, 2008.

"Hoping to foster that support for upcoming national elections, the Congress Party cynically pulled back from its original dismissal and lent credence to the conspiracy," Mulford wrote.

Regardless of Home Minister P Chidambaram's dismissal of Antulay's comments, the Indian-Muslim community "will continue to believe they are unfairly targeted by law enforcement and that those who investigate the truth are silenced," he said in the cable.

"The entire episode demonstrates that the Congress party will readily stoop to the old caste/religious-based politics if it feels it is in its interest," Mulford alleged, according to the cable posted by WikiLeaks on its website on Saturday.

Mulford said while the killing of three high-level law enforcement officers during the Mumbai attacks, including ATS chief Hemant Karkare, "is a remarkable coincidence, the Congress Party's initial reaction to Antulay's outrageous comments was correct."

"But as support seemed to swell among Muslims for Antulay's unsubstantiated claims, crass political opportunism swayed the thinking of some Congress Party leaders," he wrote.

"What's more, the (Congress) party made the cynical political calculation to lend credence to the conspiracy even after its recent emboldening state elections victories. The party chose to pander to Muslims' fears, providing impetus for those in the Muslim community who will continue to play up the conspiracy theory," Mulford wrote in his cable.

... the idea that the party would entertain "such outlandish claims proved once again that many party leaders are still wedded to the old identity politics," he said.

The 79-year-old Antulay "was probably bewildered to find that his remarks, similar in vein to what he would have routinely made in the past to attack the BJP, created such a furore this time," Mulford said.

The cable noted that Antulay "sparked a political controversy on December 17 with comments insinuating that the killing of Maharashtra Anti-Terror Squad (ATS) Chief Hemant Karkare by the Mumbai terrorists was somehow linked to Karkare's investigation of (Malegaon) bombings in which radical Hindus are suspected."

WikiLeaks: Cong played religious politics post 26/11 - Rediff.com News

Not surprisingly, Congress stalwarts are playing this game even today - here are current reports about recent statements by Digvijay Singh, who is extremely close to the Gandhi family:

Digvijay Singh's explosive revelations - Oneindia News

Karkare's widow slams Digvijay's comment - Hindustan Times
 
Last edited:
Democracy has its limitations and is not tolerent towards anything said in the name of freedom of speech.. Examples are comments on religion and comments that is against the integrity of nation.

Some people like to take pot shots against incident like these to satisfy their own egos.

Not so long ago, in my state a person has been attacked and removed from job on a similar incident where he insulted a religious person in a question paper.

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/66425-blood-their-hands.html

There are some limits regarding exercising "freedom of speech".. a little use of grey matter actually helps in identifying and justifying it.
Incident of T.S.Joseph is similar to painter M.F.Hussian for which he was hounded out of india.
 
Freedom of Speech always comes with * in the end

1. It does not give anyone rights to incite public emotions to conduct violence
2. It does not give rights to public to ask for sedition
3. It does not allow public to jeopardize the foreign and defense policy of the nation


No god damn person has right to curse my mother or father after coming to my home on the name of freedom of speech.
 
introspection and debate are not even allowed in iOK

what a pathetic incident......as pathetic as the occupation itself
 
Incident of T.S.Joseph is similar to painter M.F.Hussian for which he was hounded out of india.

And were treated very much correctly. India does not them as much as they dont need India. :cheesy: So looking by the mutual interests they got what they wanted. No India for them. :cheesy:
 
introspection and debate are not even allowed in iOK

what a pathetic incident......as pathetic as the occupation itself

Well forget about the debates when we can allow Kashmiries to debate here in Delhi despite the public anger forget about Kashmir....
 
Back
Top Bottom