What's new

'Gifts' by immigrants from Pakistan to India

Skimming

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Dec 7, 2022
Messages
1,303
Reaction score
-12
Country
India
Location
India
@lulldapull should understand that the generations that had/has fond memories and nostalgia for the West Pakistan due to their earlier residence is dying out. So what does he talk about when he says, "These immigrants (settled in India) discuss West Punjab day-in and day-out!"?

Anyway coming to the topic. Below is the list of 'gifts' by immigrants from Pakistan settled in India.

* Diamond Comics: I think not just one of it's authors, the famous cartoonist, Pran but also the founders of the company were immigrants from Pakistan.

* Late former Indian PM Dr Manmohan Singh: Needs no introduction.

Members should add if they know of other 'gifts' of erstwhile West Pakistan.

images.jpeg
 
Last edited:
. .
Many Bollywood personalities. I have watched plenty of travel videos. It is apparent Pakistan is culturally most similar to India than to Afghanistan or Iran. It is also apparent Afghanistan to Bangal can be classified under one super civilization (Indian/Hindustani).
 
. . . .
What does the OP mean by gifts? As such that they were spared the fate of millions who were slaughtered on their way to the newly formed Pakistan?

Many Bollywood personalities. I have watched plenty of travel videos. It is apparent Pakistan is culturally most similar to India than to Afghanistan or Iran. It is also apparent Afghanistan to Bangal can be classified under one super civilization (Indian/Hindustani).

It's like saying anyone who eats rice should be considered Chinese. Where do you conjur these myths from?
 
.
It's like saying anyone who eats rice should be considered Chinese. Where do you conjur these myths from?
Nobody confuses you for Iran, you are not Tajikistan. Only part of Pakistan that looks culturally similar to Afghanistan is the tribal area. Nepal looks culturally similar to India, is Hindu majority, yet it is a different country. That means your two nation theory ideology is the myth. I think Nepal is actually more Bharati than Hindustani. Bhutan does not look culturally like India despite being Buddhist majority. Sri Lanka looks culturally similar to India.
 
.
Nobody confuses you for Iran, you are not Tajikistan. Only part of Pakistan that looks culturally similar to Afghanistan is the tribal area. Nepal looks culturally similar to India, is Hindu majority, yet it is a different country. That means your two nation theory ideology is the myth. I think Nepal is actually more Bharati than Hindustani. Bhutan does not look culturally like India despite being Buddhist majority. Sri Lanka looks culturally similar to India.

What is your definition of a nation?
 
.
What is your definition of a nation?
It is not my personal definition. Words have universal meaning found in dictionary or thesaurus.

Nation definition - 'a large body of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular country or territory'.

Can add ethnicity to it too but there is no religion in the definition. Arabs are Arab whether Muslim, Christian, Polytheist, Hypocrite or Atheist.

Religion and culture are not the same. Hypothetically, every person in the world could be the same religion, yet they would be different culturally. It is nonsense to identify exclusively by religion, if you do, you are hijacking it claiming it for an agenda or myth. Hijacking religion is a disgusting modern problem related to nationalism, which is also usually disgusting.
 
Last edited:
.
It is not my personal definition. Words have universal meaning found in dictionary or thesaurus.

Nation definition - 'a large body of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular country or territory'.

Can add ethnicity to it too but there is no religion in the definition. Arabs are Arab whether Muslim, Christian, Polytheist, Hypocrite or Atheist.

Religion and culture are not the same. Hypothetically, every person in the world could be the same religion, yet they would be different culturally. It is nonsense to identify exclusively by religion, if you do, you are hijacking it claiming it for an agenda or myth. Hijacking religion is a disgusting modern problem related to nationalism, which is also usually disgusting.

Nobody confuses you for Iran, you are not Tajikistan. Only part of Pakistan that looks culturally similar to Afghanistan is the tribal area. Nepal looks culturally similar to India, is Hindu majority, yet it is a different country. That means your two nation theory ideology is the myth. I think Nepal is actually more Bharati than Hindustani. Bhutan does not look culturally like India despite being Buddhist majority. Sri Lanka looks culturally similar to India.

Why would you contradict yourself within a day so beautifully? I think this is the only trait that unites many tribes and nations found within India, the hypocrisy. However I have maintained my position that India is a symbol of piracy and hypocrisy.

Pakistan was and always will be an ideological state. A concept of a super nation formed on the basis of democratic will of people united by religion.

The modern construct of Hindustani or Bharati is a political myth borne out of desperation.
 
.
Why would you contradict yourself within a day so beautifully? I think this is the only trait that unites many tribes and nations found within India, the hypocrisy. However I have maintained my position that India is a symbol of piracy and hypocrisy.

Pakistan was and always will be an ideological state. A concept of a super nation formed on the basis of democratic will of people united by religion.

The modern construct of Hindustani or Bharati is a political myth borne out of desperation.
You are mad. There is no contradiction. Afghanistan to Bangal can be identified as one civilization based on ancient history. Any serious academic book related to Indian ancient history covers this geographical area.

India or Hindustan is ancient. I did not get my great great grandparents identity from the British. They did not speak English so they could not have been brainwashed with an identity that was not theirs. But Pakistan was literally created in England.

Too bad you are stuck with an invented ideology blinding you to ancient history. I would not want to be in your position. Bangladesh broke away from that insanity, they started the mess to begin with.
 
.
You are mad. There is no contradiction. Afghanistan to Bangal can be identified as one civilization based on ancient history. Any serious academic book related to Indian ancient history covers this geographical area.

India or Hindustan is ancient. I did not get my great great grandparents identity from the British. They did not speak English so they could not have been brainwashed with an identity that was not theirs. But Pakistan was literally created in England.

Too bad you are stuck with an invented ideology blinding you to ancient history. I would not want to be in your position. Bangladesh broke away from that insanity, they started the mess to begin with.

So you went from claiming India to be a nation to a civilisation? The British found the subcontinent as it was for centuries before, a collection of nation states and tribal entities. It wasn't called an Indian Union for no reason.

All ideologies are invented you brainwashed Bihari.
 
.
So you went from claiming India to be a nation to a civilisation? The British found the subcontinent as it was for centuries before, a collection of nation states and tribal entities. It wasn't called an Indian Union for no reason.

All ideologies are invented you brainwashed Bihari.
I wrote civilization initially, Einstein wannabe. Scroll back and read my first post.

Bihar is very ancient Vedic word. Original Bihari is the oldest identity in Indian civilization on par with Aryans whose language was Sanskrit. We are different groups in origin though. This is something not known academically. Tamil identity is extremely old too, but they are not founders of Indian civilization.

Sorry but I don't think you are most similar to Afghanistan, Iran, Arabia or China, and I don't understand why that would offend you. You run from ancient Indian history like your Bharat cousins go into denial about medieval Indian history. Weird as hell. Still, I don't think their denial is as bad as yours.

You don't notice the similarity between you and Bharati Hindutva?? Both hijack religion. That streak runs in Iran and Afghanistan too, must be some Scythian cultural commonality. Anyway, don't listen to me if it offends you, listen to your bosses.
 
.
I wrote civilization initially, Einstein wannabe. Scroll back and read my first post.

Bihar is very ancient Vedic word. Original Bihari is the oldest identity in Indian civilization on par with Aryans whose language was Sanskrit. We are different groups in origin though. This is something not known academically. Tamil identity is extremely old too, but they are not founders of Indian civilization.

Sorry but I don't think you are most similar to Afghanistan, Iran, Arabia or China, and I don't understand why that would offend you. You run from ancient Indian history like your Bharat cousins go into denial about medieval Indian history. Weird as hell. Still, I don't think their denial is as bad as yours.

You don't notice the similarity between you and Bharati Hindutva?? Both hijack religion. That streak runs in Iran and Afghanistan too, must be some Scythian cultural commonality. Anyway, don't listen to me if it offends you, listen to your bosses.

Are Biharis a linguistic group, a nation or a civilisation?

Why don't these Biharis call for a separate nation of mindfuck Biharpur or Bihargarh based on their unique civilisation? Too cuckold to leave behind the imposed Indian identity?
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom