KS
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2010
- Messages
- 12,528
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
As far as the report is concerned, it is clear that it isn't the ommission of Kashmir as a dispute from the UN agenda but ommission of Kashmir from a statement or report by UK envoy to UN. Whether it was inadvertent or planned is another issue.
It isnt an omission perse. But just a harbinger of bigger things to come.
If it was inadvertent, then it will be rectified. If it was planned, even then it should not come as a surprise given the current geo-politics.
I dont believe in this inadvertent BS. As one member said this is not a district leverl office where 60 year olds pound furiously on the keyboard.
There are many levels of cross-verification and going over before it is presented.
The fact remains that it is a dispute, acknowledged very recently by Mr Manmohan Singh, which needs to be resolved and that too between Pakistan and India. The western world will take sides as it sees fit and beneficial. And will continue to do so as long as we remain at loggerheads with each other.
It rests with the two governments to move forward on the issue and on the people to press for it.
It is a dispute. But the Indian meaning for the word is different from the Pakistani meaning of the word.
In Indian context it is used to denote strictly the Disputed areas of "Azad " Kashmir and the Northern Areas which India considers to be under the "illegal" ocupation of Pakistan ,NOT J&K.