kashmir is unfinished agenda of Partition #COAS

[ice_man]

Your proxies regularly rot in unmarked graves....

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/23/world/asia/23kashmir.html

you mean these Kashmiris?

If kashmir wanted to be with you i am sure you wouldn't need to be deploying 70% of your forces in the area.

Kashmir will remain disputed. You will keep denying and the situation will carry on for another century.

nothing new will happen. go back to sleep

 

[Sipahi]

Please.

I thought two 2009 batchmates were having a serious mature conversation here.

Hahahaha it was a joke,

If this issue will remain unresolved, Mullah and Pundits will be the largest beneficiaries.

The militancy started in Pakistan due to this Kashmir issue and it will not resolved until the leaders of both nation sit and resolve the matter.

 

[Super Falcon]

..LOL...they tried to grab Kashmir in 1965...and ended up defending Lahore...
they are celebrating their failures today..

And we defended well your asses got burned and we got azad kashmir

It was your failure you wanted dinner in lahore we burned your backs u never forget

Indians tanks graveyard 200 indian tanks against 44 pak tanks yet you loose like pigs

MM Alam burn your fighter created record no one can broke

It is also certified in books of your ex soldiers so plz be gentleman

History books show you lost the war

 

[Foxtrot-Bravo]

Yup it is.

 

[Stag112]

A company making pagers for a lucrative profit must keep reminding people how pagers are still current and useful and a must to have

 

[soundHound]

and meanwhile India realigned GSAT 6 into orbit, and is preparing for to relaunchable space vehicle.

Please put more effort over development, than robbing people of basic needs in name of war and crying kashmir each and every time.

 

[Neutron]

It is pertinent to mention that Kashmir is the unfinished agenda of the partition in sub continent. The innocent people of Indian occupied Kashmir are being subjected to injustice and atrocities for over the last seven decades. It should be clearly understood that enduring peace in the region will not be possible without a just resolution of Kashmir. The issue can no longer be put on the back burner. The time has come that Kashmir issue should be resolved in line with the aspirations of its people in accordance with UN resolutionsLadies and Gentlemen; I am proud to command one of the most battle hardened Armies of the world, which has no prallels. Armed forces of Pakistan are fully capable to deal all types of internal and external threats, may it be conventional or sub-conventional; whether it is cold start or hot start. We are ready!!

 

[ice_man]

IA is there in kashmir to crush PA"s wet dreams of capturing kashmir by force ....you tried in 48, 65 and in 99 but failed to capture kashmir because of strong and professional Indian Secular army deployed in kashmir.


you got *** ( AZad? kashmir ) because nehru ran to UN for lust of Noble peace prize .....


they dont teach you history they teach you propaganda..we have videos of your war veterans admitting how they failed to capture kashmir your so called jaguar vein ....

your trolling aside why is your army deployed IN KASHMIR and not along the LoC only?

Answer is simple Kashmiris are not happy.

give them their rights or keep facing an uprising.

while Azaad Kashmir remains peaceful

 

[ice_man]

dont behave like imature person....kashmir is very strategic both pak and china have intentions towards that land and you ask why army is there in kashmir...??

kashmiries rejected you in 48, 65 and in 99..thats why you fail to capture kashmir ..without local suport India cant hold kashmir...

yes kashmir rejected us really??

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/23/world/asia/23kashmir.html

protest in kashmir - Google Search

www.nytimes.com/2015/04/19/world/asia/one-killed-in-kashmir-valley-protest.html



how do you explain these pictures of protest and mass graves in kashmir?

stop fooling yourself.

 

[VCheng]

This is an unfinished fight.

This is an old fight.

This fight is not going to go away by talking.

Or by "solving" Kashmir.

This fight will be fought. And peace will come when one side can fight no more.

Because neither side will not want to fight no more.

Hard truths.

Now that both sides have nuclear weapons, there will be no major direct war between the two. Like other post-nuclear adversaries, the real tussle will henceforth be economic and fought over decades.

 

[vsdoc]

Now that both sides have nuclear weapons, there is be no major direct war between the two. Like other post-nuclear adversaries, the real tussle will henceforth be economic and fought over decades.

Sadly no.

This fight will be fought violently. But covertly.

Is being fought violently, but covertly.

@Icarus @Irfan Baloch @third eye

 

[third eye]

Now that both sides have nuclear weapons, there will be no major direct war between the two. Like other post-nuclear adversaries, the real tussle will henceforth be economic and fought over decades.

One would like to believe that this would be true.

Economically, I do not see any comparison between India & Pakistan now or in the distant future

Sadly no.

This fight will be fought violently. But covertly.

Is being fought violently, but covertly.

History has it that the fighting type of wars have never solved a problem worldwide. At best they have subdued a problem temporarily.

The non fighting ones have erased / imploded nations - example USSR.

Thats all I'd like to say.

 

[VCheng]

One would like to believe that this would be true.

Economically, I do not see any comparison between India & Pakistan now or in the distant future

Pakistan is lagging behind, right now that may be true, but it can definitely catch up and indeed spurt ahead if it sets its collective mind to it. India's present lead is not assured.

 

[Bang Galore]

Pakistan is lagging behind, right now that may be true, but it can definitely catch up and indeed spurt ahead if it sets its collective mind to it. India's present lead is not assured.

You know what they say...

"If my aunt had ball$, she'd be my uncle"

 

[AntiToxic]

dont behave like imature person....kashmir is very strategic both pak and china have intentions towards that land and you ask why army is there in kashmir...??

kashmiries rejected you in 48, 65 and in 99..thats why you fail to capture kashmir ..without local suport India cant hold kashmir...

Need to show that pot belly general to .. mind his own country and problems.... Azad Kashmir belongs to india.. so its unfinished business..