JF-17 Thunder vs LCA Tejas ( a neutral comparison trolling not needed)

[AUz]

@Thread Starter

Don't be stupid.First,spend some time in this fcuking forum ! All these BS has been discussed a zillion times..Your "neutral" lol neutral part) comparison is horse crap.

 

[sathya]

sir with most respect Lca is as gud as it is on paper , its still not in production phase thus not opretional yet. as far As Mk2 it is far far away probably 2030 or beyond

LSP7 & 8 ... will b operated by airforce pilots...
LSP 7 is due in august..
yes compared to jf 17 , LCA is going slow. surprisingly jf 17 wants even more lead gap ( recent ?urgent 50 jf 17)
but IAF will get their hands on from this august.. hopefully all LCA mk1 2015...
so from 2016 we expect mk 2 .. which will b most likely..

 

[untitled]

here we go again

 

[monitor]

You start a product mark as two country's hallmark of their indigenous defence manufacturing capability and expect no trolling
It will be a record if any trollign does not take place .

 

[sathya]

here we go again

can't resist ... lol

 

[naveenp]

close the thread.

@ thread starter--> please post a new thread when jf-17 faces LCA. until that time both jets are just like toys.

 

[deckingraj]

Well the only reason I mentioned the block 2 was to show how fast the jf-17 program is moving, by the time the first LCA squadron is up and running, the block 2 aircraft may well be joining the air force as well...so essentially you are comparing an aircraft that is ahead in its technological development than the LCA.
The needs also differ greatly, the PAF needs the jf-17 to be a viable fighter, to take on mkis and the mrca's as they come over the border. The LCA will replace the mig-21 and be also used in the defensive role, but due to the Indo-Pak dynamic, the PAF offensives into India will be most likely be border incursions not very far into Indian territory since the Pakistanis will always be forced to fight a defensive war due to India's quantitative and qualitative advantages. In such circumstances, the jf-17 has been made increasingly more advanced since it would bear the brunt of Indian attacks in Pakistan, while the LCAs will probably get off far easier.

Nice post but what the mistake you are making(most Pakistani unknowingly-knowingly do) is forgetting China...Unlike PAF, IAF has two adversary..both PAF and PLAAF.....Secondly please keep in mind unlike PAF, IAF has both loads of money and plethora of choices to choose fighters from.....If LCA is not best of best then this fighter will not have much future....It will act as a gap filler and that's about it...However the way ministry is working on this one it gives you a different inclination...