aliyusuf
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- May 2, 2010
- Messages
- 1,383
- Reaction score
- 6
- Country
- Location
... I've seen the thing making crazy rolls and loops several times and know how agile the damn thing is. What they show at the airshow is a cutshort thing at best.
Imagine the consequences on its market if something went wrong during the qirshow, it's still a new entrant in the market.
I get what you are trying to say i.e. it (JF-17) is not being allowed to perform to it's true potential in public.
But this can also be taken as a lack of confidence (??) on the platform's robustness ... that a platform that first entered service in 2007/2008 (a decade ago) ... is still not allowed to perform as freely as other platforms like the F-16 and the JAS-39 Gripen. The Viper and the Gripen were giving it their all in air shows 10 years after entering service.
My personal opinion is that the Thunder's field performance was never planned to exceed that of the Viper. Improved sensors, avionics and advanced medium range and short range munitions are going to be it's forte. For a main stay type, that is not bad for an air force in this region.
However, a high-end type is needed that would take up that mantle from the Viper in the near future.
Just my humble two cents.