What's new

JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 7]

.
What about block III
 

Attachments

  • FB_IMG_1577562438219.jpg
    FB_IMG_1577562438219.jpg
    55.5 KB · Views: 169
  • FB_IMG_1577562352724.jpg
    FB_IMG_1577562352724.jpg
    20.4 KB · Views: 179
  • FB_IMG_1577562361788.jpg
    FB_IMG_1577562361788.jpg
    15.9 KB · Views: 174
  • FB_IMG_1577562376907.jpg
    FB_IMG_1577562376907.jpg
    35.5 KB · Views: 179
  • FB_IMG_1577562410050.jpg
    FB_IMG_1577562410050.jpg
    33.8 KB · Views: 176
  • FB_IMG_1577562306751.jpg
    FB_IMG_1577562306751.jpg
    17.9 KB · Views: 181
  • FB_IMG_1577562344748.jpg
    FB_IMG_1577562344748.jpg
    13.6 KB · Views: 175
  • FB_IMG_1577562415956.jpg
    FB_IMG_1577562415956.jpg
    35.6 KB · Views: 178
  • FB_IMG_1577562433064.jpg
    FB_IMG_1577562433064.jpg
    57.1 KB · Views: 173
. .
This area also has now fuel cells ?? I think previous block single seater did not ??? I think [emoji848]

Adjustments.JPG
 
. . .
I was hoping the tail would look more like the one found on the JF17B.
 
. . . .
Guys this is the first prototype

many changes will happen

Anyone remember the very ugly IFR on the test block I ?

they made it better in the operational units

my point is this is not the final configuration
 
. . .
Yes it does look cool, but now that I think of it, and people have said it before this aircraft will not have big changes. If the current tail works well then why change it.
But still I wonder why PAF has decided to go with 2 different types of tail configurations instead of sticking to one found in earlier Block I and II aircrafts. Or just upgrading the Block III tail found on JF17B
 
Last edited:
.
Can the MAWs, noticed in the recent pic of a Block III (behind the air intakes and the verticle fin), be retrofitted to the earlies Blocks?

80886239_2526361164308450_79846878006476800_n-jpg.596470


and do we know who flew this Block III, one of our boys or the CATIC big shot?
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom