Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
so ws-13's life is only about a quarter of rd-93? that's a huge difference! I am surprised that chinese who are good at reverse engineering stuff would do so badly this time.1200 MTBO. 2400 hours shelf life but can be extended using deep overhauls and swapping new parts. We have plenty of experience in the latter ala MRF.
so ws-13's life is only about a quarter of rd-93? that's a huge difference! I am surprised that chinese who are good at reverse engineering stuff would do so badly this time.
Hi,
I really would be surprised if that was true---. With the modern machines that they have---number of metallurgists---better alloys---that does not sound right---.
Another engine is in mind and is being evaluated right now just like the Aesa Radars. I have learnt that WS-13 has been designed in such a way that it fits FC-1 without any major modification in the air frame.
Most welcome. As @messiach has noted for so long, these were upgrades that there similar to what is now available on the RD-93MA. But I am guessing PAF didn't go with the MA for the Block 3, its got a new engine.
Might be but its still long way to go whereas WS-13E is almost completed, may next block after block-3 (BLOCK-IV) if PAC/PAF plan to introduce BOCK-IV will used that engine, but its almost certain Block-3 will use either RD-93MA or WS-13E @ShaneIf not RD93 then it could very well be WS19 or at least it may be the one being evaluated. So @Arsalan and @pakistanipower , there is another engine in possible contention for BlockIII.
You may be right. It is mere speculation and guess work at this point. With PAC and CATIC rightly being tight lipped about works in progress, all we have is translation of Chinese website claims that may or may not be true but it puts things in an interesting perspective like @MastanKhan stated about the growing Chinese metallurgical expertise.Might be but its still long way to go whereas WS-13E is almost completed, may next block after block-3 (BLOCK-IV) if PAC/PAF plan to introduce BOCK-IV will used that engine, but its almost certain Block-3 will use either RD-93MA or WS-13E @Shane
You may be right. It is mere speculation and guess work at this point. With PAC and CATIC rightly being tight lipped about works in progress, all we have is translation of Chinese website claims that may or may not be true but it puts things in an interesting perspective like @MastanKhan stated about the growing Chinese metallurgical expertise.
In another news item dating from mid 2017, WS19 may not be something that just popped up in 2019, we get some more intriguing insight into the Project S3-2 (may be WS19):
It is understood that before the turbofan-19 was officially introduced, the detailed report on China's new medium-thrust turbofan engine was only the "S3-2 type technical verification machine" project. The S3-2 type technical verification machine is a double-rotor, afterburning turbofan engine with a vector nozzle. The maximum state thrust was 9800kgf, and the thrust-to-weight ratio 9th. The goal was to obtain the national project after the verification machine technology meets the standards. An important member of the Chinese engine type spectrum, after mass production, meets the demand for medium-thrust turbofan engines with vector nozzles in the military aviation engine market.
From the performance parameters of the S3-2 technical verification machine and the performance description of the turbofan-19 "Huangshan" on the network, the two are very close. It is possible that the advanced technology development of the S3-2 technical verification machine has reached the target. After obtaining the approval of the engine model development project, it entered the prototype development stage. It is said that the target of the turbofan-19 is the F414 turbofan engine, which is larger than the European EJ200 engine in terms of maximum thrust.
Is this news agency reporting on the basis of these threads?
I think its based on FLIGHTGOLBAL report..Is this news agency reporting on the basis of these threads?