So compressor stalls at high AoA and low speed a thing of the past?Surpass! No.
Failure detection & dual redundant power module is certainly based on series 33.
LP speed governor is mostly collaboration under ToT.
TER has major input from BUAA.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So compressor stalls at high AoA and low speed a thing of the past?Surpass! No.
Failure detection & dual redundant power module is certainly based on series 33.
LP speed governor is mostly collaboration under ToT.
TER has major input from BUAA.
So compressor stalls at high AoA and low speed a thing of the past?
Figure of speech.No one will guarantee a stall-free engine.
LP speed governor development was going on for a while at BUAA under ToT with russians.
Figure of speech.
You only have to look at Mushtaq numbers to know that PAF will keep on making the JF17 beyond the stated values, way more than 250, and closer to 450 imho.
Correct it wont be single platform but jf-17 with multiple variants will be the core force. For JF-17, we would see something like JF-17 NG if Chengdu crowd keeps their thinking hats on; for now Blk 3 / B models would be the dominant build for next 3-4 years. For NG, there would definitely have to be soul searching and most likely review Gripen NG to learn. Could we see canard configuration? better engine and more use of composites? Just some thoughts. There is a long long way to go and i see a lot of potential.That is not going to happen and your example is not really accurate as majority of the Mushaks are used by Army Aviation instead of PAF. Pakistan's goal is to have 450 fighter jets in total and it won't ever be a single-platform force.
Correct it wont be single platform but jf-17 with multiple variants will be the core force. For JF-17, we would see something like JF-17 NG if Chengdu crowd keeps their thinking hats on; for now Blk 3 / B models would be the dominant build for next 3-4 years. For NG, there would definitely have to be soul searching and most likely review Gripen NG to learn. Could we see canard configuration? better engine and more use of composites? Just some thoughts. There is a long long way to go and i see a lot of potential.
Hi,
Paf does not like the Canard Version for some reason---.
Correct it wont be single platform but jf-17 with multiple variants will be the core force. For JF-17, we would see something like JF-17 NG if Chengdu crowd keeps their thinking hats on; for now Blk 3 / B models would be the dominant build for next 3-4 years. For NG, there would definitely have to be soul searching and most likely review Gripen NG to learn. Could we see canard configuration? better engine and more use of composites? Just some thoughts. There is a long long way to go and i see a lot of potential.
not really.Higher RCS
Well they are then doomed to make the same folly as they did with Mirage 3/5 pgm; vs going with full out Cheetah conversion.Hi,
Paf does not like the Canard Version for some reason---.
Canards can alsoHigher RCS
Which Canard version? Is there an official paper on this? @messiachHi,
Paf does not like the Canard Version for some reason---.