What's new

JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 7]

Screenshot_2017-09-02-01-25-15.png


Screenshot_2017-09-02-01-33-42.png
 
No difference between FADeC and DEEC/IDEEC except FADeC being full authority utilizes APRI - augmented PRI digital control which obviates need for SEC hydromechanical controls. IDEEC was introduced in PW 229 variants which also boast ATDPS - asymmetric thrust departure prevention which you may see in pakistans next gen fighters.
is that english?
 
No difference between FADeC and DEEC/IDEEC except FADeC being full authority utilizes APRI - augmented PRI digital control which obviates need for SEC hydromechanical controls. IDEEC was introduced in PW 229 variants which also boast ATDPS - asymmetric thrust departure prevention which you may see in pakistans next gen fighters.

Many thanks, madam. Is it correct to deduce that Pakistan's NG fighter may be twin engine?

Also, is it correct to say that DEEC is better because it gives the flexibility for manual override, if and when needed?

Lastly, is DEEC included on RD-93 by default or is it a Pakistani addition? I am asking because from Google it seems DEEC is a pretty much American innovation, so how come we have it on a Russian engine?
 
Many thanks, madam. Is it correct to deduce that Pakistan's NG fighter may be twin engine?

Also, is it correct to say that DEEC is better because it gives the flexibility for manual override, if and when needed?

Lastly, is DEEC included on RD-93 by default or is it a Pakistani addition? I am asking because from Google it seems DEEC is a pretty much American innovation, so how come we have it on a Russian engine?
Statement based on open sources already know and guess ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom