alimobin memon
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2009
- Messages
- 2,504
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
Nobody is saying Bested sorry...
"Jf17 performed well against su27"
"Jf17 performed well against su27"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
order of battle
JFT
16 Squadron - Peshawar - 20 aircraft
26 Squadron - Peshawar - 20 aircraft
26 Squadron - Minhas - 9 aircraft
Sir G...Ive heard news regarding the Max output of RD-93 used by PAF at 98KN from Couple of Mid ranking PAF Officers...I know from this forum Max thrust of RD-93 at somewhere near 86 KN...Which thrust stands correct in your opinion...
I dont just think but I believe that the PAC video which was released recently showing new design of jf17 and 49 completely produced was actually documented well ago. at least a 1 and half year ago but published
Its not 0.85 , its 0.95-0.97 vs 1.03 of f-16..the figure are widely available and can be even calculated using clean weight and thrustThe T:W ratio of a JF-17 is about 0.85 to 1.
Its not 0.85 , its 0.95-0.97 vs 1.03 of f-16..the figure are widely available and can be even calculated using clean weight and thrust
mirage has t/w ratio of about .91
Its not 0.85 , its 0.95-0.97 vs 1.03 of f-16..the figure are widely available and can be even calculated using clean weight and thrust
mirage has t/w ratio of about .91
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RD-93#RD-93
RD-93
A variant used to power the JF-17 / FC-1. According to JF-17.com "The most significant difference being the repositioning of the gearbox along the bottom of the engine casing." The Klimov poster at Zhuhai 2010 airshow gave the thrust of the engine to be up to 98 kN.[3]
It is officially acknowledged to be up-to 98 KN.
It's 0.85 and you are basing your TW ratio on rumours which is totally wrong because Pakistan still using base line RD-93
This poster refers to RD-93B which Pakistan still hasn't required. If JF-17 thrust was 98 KN, wouldn't you seen another hard point in Block 2?
Ok lets add sense substance to this -= Comparable in which way, which performance characteristics?
The JF-17 is not even in the payload class of the F-16.
the standarad to quote T/W ratio is clean load weight and taking thrustMy figure is accurate Sir and I will stand by it: 0.85 to 1.
the standarad to quote T/W ratio is clean load weight and taking thrust
so 86000n/91000n=0.95
if you quote other figures that will be against the convention of taking loaded weight and thrust (with afterburn)..
other wise an aircraft i s usually loaded with lots of external payload and doesnt use afterburns so in reality T/W is much lower
FOR F-16
12700/12,000=1.05
using baseline thrust of 86kn the T/W comes out to be 0.95, if u use other values it would be higher than this. this value is also quoted offcially
funny people neither believe maths nor offical figures these days!
PAKISTAN AERONAUTICAL COMPLEX KAMRA