MastanKhan
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2005
- Messages
- 21,269
- Reaction score
- 166
- Country
- Location
Boss you r right but i dont agree that we have zero metallurgical base. We have thousands of engineers trained by Dr. AQ Khan who is a metallurgist himself. If we can work with elements like Uranium, we can work with other metals too. Its just to get in positive frame of mind. I m 100% sure, give your scientists an objective, give them resources, they can provide u with result. Regards
Youngman,
Your post seems that you have no knowledge about the subject matter---you are just trying to wing it.
Let me just give you a comparison---making a fighter aircraft engine is about a 1000 times more difficult than making the nuc bomb that pak has---.
Even making a piston engine 10 times more difficult than making a nuc----. In todays economy---a good successful gasoline piston engine would cost around 2---5 billion dollars---and no current manufacturer in the world is taking the risk to invest on their own----even mega corporations who may have a 100 times more budget than pakistan at their disposal.
Please go through this board and postings and read---read read and read----. A nation like india---with countless PHD's--govt behind the project---with actual blue prints of a diesel engine---supposedly to be 1500 HP output---the end product could only deliver 500 HP---.
This comment not being disrespectful to india---but showing you to understand the enormity of the project.
As for those in PAF---if they can just focus on the job that they have and give it just 90 % --- they need to focus on providing security to their bases----that will be well worth it---.
Don't feel bad---there have been many on this board with similiar ideas about making a fighter aircraft engine and no understanding what it takes to do it.