JF-17 Block III Model Presented To The Participants

[Windjammer]

this is not jf-17 block 3.it looks like f-16 block 52.

Since when has Block-52 adopted side intakes.

 

[StormBreaker]

Since when has Block-52 adopted side intakes.

Jani, kyun gehrai mein jatay ho !!!
Pehli nazar mein F-16 ka dhoka hai thanks to the wings and horizontal stabilizers, their shape and the slanted VS.

 

[AbuzarIlyas]

The Indo Pak Airspace is very suitable for a lightweight fighter like JF-17 Thunder to carry out its operations. We do not have enough space to fire a barrage of BVR missiles on each other and then turn away to respective airbases so 7 hard points configuration is enough as of now.

Indians are burdening their own selves with extra heavyweight large RCS fighters getting detected earlier and banged at the hands of PAF. Why spend 10 bucks when we can do it with just one. I think PAF is trying to keep thunder as silent as they can.

 

[StormBreaker]

The Indo Pak Airspace is very suitable for a lightweight fighter like JF-17 Thunder to carry out its operations. We do not have enough space to fire a barrage of BVR missiles on each other and then turn away to respective airbases so 7 hard points configuration is enough as of now.

Indians are burdening their own selves with extra heavyweight large RCS fighters getting detected earlier and banged at the hands of PAF. Why spend 10 bucks when we can do it with just one. I think PAF is trying to keep thunder as silent as they can.

Ok, thanks , but this is not relevant to the thread

 

[Irfan Baloch]

PAF fanboys have been duped!
I knew from beginning that block 3 is not going to be any different from earlier blocks.

the thaings our fanboys and enthusiasts been wishing will make it JF-18 and it wont be a same plane anymore.
they want bigger engine, radar more payload, more pods more hard points more speed and so forth.

 

[khanasifm]

just speculations,I will hold on till officially confirmed or denied anything

 

[MAB]

A Source tells me that this is the Model of JF-17 Block-3 that was presented to the PAF Air chief and other dignitaries who attended to witness the first flight of the type earlier this month.

Looks like a model of the regular JF-17B. TBH I cant really understand how people are able to deduce differences from a model like this. Its not necessarily built to exact scale.

 

[GriffinsRule]

That is and I mentioned that later on

But !!!

The nose is definitely different, khair, whatsoever, B3 is not the concern, we can wait. The current situation is definitely A concern !!!

Recit Surah Shams and keep on praying for Armed forces !!!

Nothing is different in that aircraft vs any other single seats so far. There is already a picture of 19-262 under construction as well, which is likely the last block II to be produced for PAF

 

[Zarvan]

If you know how to read serials, that's definitely Block-II.

PAF doesn't want you to see the Block-III just yet.




I know, but that's not Block-III.

If im right, i get to kill @Zarvan, if im wrong, you get to kill Zarvan.

Bet?

What I did ???

You are asking for a new plane : )

No just asking for addition of two hard points

 

[Last starfighter]

Look what I shared:

 

[Pakistani Fighter]

The Indo Pak Airspace is very suitable for a lightweight fighter like JF-17 Thunder to carry out its operations. We do not have enough space to fire a barrage of BVR missiles on each other and then turn away to respective airbases so 7 hard points configuration is enough as of now.

Indians are burdening their own selves with extra heavyweight large RCS fighters getting detected earlier and banged at the hands of PAF. Why spend 10 bucks when we can do it with just one. I think PAF is trying to keep thunder as silent as they can.

Nope. What happened on 26 Feb? Indians with thier strike packages and escorts were thier in huge numbers in different places and they distracted us and then came from AJK

 

[khanasifm]

What I did ???


No just asking for addition of two hard points

Two new under intake expected plus hopefully they should strength the wingtip to carry heavier sd-10 at least like f-16

 

[Saifullah]

And for that, the DSI has to be removed hence going back the super 7 route

DSI is effective till around Mach 2 beyond that it has problem. F16 was already tested for it.

 

[Ultima Thule]

DSI is effective till around Mach 2 beyond that it has problem. F16 was already tested for it.

F-16 tested DSI for the development for F-35

 

[BRAVO_]

guess where is the difference ?