GriffinsRule
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2015
- Messages
- 3,394
- Reaction score
- 7
- Country
- Location
I think cheap should be omitted from our defense lexicon and replaced by cost effective
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cheap is bad, Cost Effective is also not a good one. With Block-3 in hand our narrative should revolve around quality, capability, weapon package and no strings attached. Just my personal view.I think cheap should be omitted from our defense lexicon and replaced by cost effective
Cheap is bad, Cost Effective is also not a good one. With Block-3 in hand our narrative should revolve around quality, capability, weapon package and no strings attached. Just my personal view.
Very sensible comments.Cheap is bad, Cost Effective is also not a good one. With Block-3 in hand our narrative should revolve around quality, capability, weapon package and no strings attached. Just my personal view.
A $100mm jet is more cost effective than a $200mm one. Neither is cheap. Cost effective is what Thunder is, ie brings a subset of capabilities at a lower price point then it's competition.
PS everyone already knows that. But if you want to sell it as a budget fighter, it at least sounds better. Unless you guys have an alternate adjective.
Keep in mind it's market is not Europe or rich Gulf states but poor economies and third world countries. Pakistan due to its own beggar status does not have the clout to compete in other markets unfortunately where geopolitical strength is a factor.
NOTE: The following is pure speculation on my part.
The static display of Block 3 makes no sense at all to me. When I consider that both the Army chief and Air chief were present at the air show, I then wonder: has there been a private viewing of the Block 3? The aircraft flew there under its own power, it will fly back under its own power, why couldn’t it fly for a private viewing?
In any case, they are certainly trying to create suspense with the static display. We still don’t have any video of Block 3 going through its moves. @messiach
Khan sb, most of the capability will remain underplayed. The capability domain has moved into critical areas. Take careHi,
Paf is trying to under play the JF17 BLK3---that is why we don't see too much show & pomp at the dubai air show---. No plethora of smart air to surface weapons or air to ship weapons----just only dumb bombs with their kits--- .
Jeff is literally a monstrous aircraft below the 5th gen category---covering all versions of the 4.5 gen aircrafts and below on agiven day---.
With an aesa radar---data link---update EW warfare package---PL15 / SD 10 --and the HOBS missile for air to air and then some very capable air to ground & air to ship missiles---.
You pakistani posters are posting some not very intelligent comments regarding the show case & not understanding what is at stake---
Today---you are in competition with any and every american aircraft other than the F-22 & the F-35 on so very very close to equal terms that there are showing some serious concerns by the men in blue---.
So, the old question for you ma'am, which is better, F-16 blk 52, or JF-17 blk 3 ??Khan sb, most of the capability will remain underplayed. The capability domain has moved into critical areas. Take care
range and payload, blk52, everything else that matters blk3... range could be achieved with refueling but payload cannot beSo, the old question for you ma'am, which is better, F-16 blk 52, or JF-17 blk 3 ??
Indeed, very nice looking bird.
So, the old question for you ma'am, which is better, F-16 blk 52, or JF-17 blk 3 ??
SO as per recent allegations about AirChief Corruption, JF-17 Block-3 project suffered critical delays which resulted in the inquiry. That inquiry has been been suppressed by Sidhu Sahab. Apparently F-16 sustainability program also suffered delays which caused an inquiry but that too suppressed by Chief Sahab