Jesus Christ has no mention in history : PM IMRAN Khan

[Vikki]

He maybe correct. The existence of Jesus is disputed by historians, and there is no significant record of his existence.

But the problem with defending imran khan is ,if Muslims deny the existence of Jesus,then the foundation of Islam will collapse like a pack of cards too.

 

[doorstar]

But the problem with defending imran khan is ,if Muslims deny the existence of Jesus,then the foundation of Islam will collapse like a pack of cards too.

Believing in Christ is matter of faith, NOT history!

 

[takeiteasy]

 

[AHMED85]

Stupid Man Got Big Chair With His Mind

Simply He Can Not Handle This Ordinary Chair

 

[Lincoln]

Why doesn't a simple thing go through your mind that only history which should be believed by a Muslim about Hazrat Isa (PBUH) is the one mentioned in the Quran. Everything else is not believable because the people who wrote that history they also used to worship him.
So coming back to your point "General history and Other textures" are not a verified source of information for a Muslim regarding Prophets.

And when you are talking about Prophets the least you could do is watch your language.

Are you implying that there isn't enough history regarding Hazrat Isa (AS) even in our Islamic Texts to be given mentionable significance in a historical context, because that is exactly what IK said.

 

[FalconStar]

Are you implying that there isn't enough history regarding Hazrat Isa (AS) even in our Islamic Texts to be given mentionable significance in a historical context, because that is exactly what IK said.

Hazrat Isa (PBUH) is as important to our belief as any other Prophet, as our Iman is not complete until you believe in all the Prophets of Allah. What IK said is we need to research and teach our new generation the real truth about the Prophets. Not the story being propagated by the western world.

Like look at you, just for the sake of opposing IK you are agreeing with the version of Hazrat Isa (PBUH) presented by the Bible as Jesus.
In Authentic Islamic Books their is not much text about the life of Hazrat Isa (PBUH), people only know what the Quran tells us. He is telling people to do research in University so we can separate the fiction from reality and present a good and authentic version of the life of Prophets and teach that version to our next generation so they don't have to refer to Hazrat Isa (PBUH) as Jesus.

 

[Foxtrot Delta]

I think this must be out of context cuz Muslims kove jesus PBUH more than anyone else and muslim history plus christian history is full of his mention and tales.

Jesus's picture along with his mother's picture is hanging in Makkah in house of Allah. Called Qiblah towards which all muslims pray including me.

Thats ur history 1400 years inside makkah his name and his photo as a beloved Prophet of Almighty Allah.

I think this statement must be out of context imran khan doesn't seem like a lunatic


I think he means history outside of religious text. Like excluding what holy books or scholars of religion say. He doesnt consider bibles gospels or quran as history. He is speaking outside the norm of religious text.

Even then he is wrong.

One very important thing for muslims and imran khan includid is. Muslims can't say Mohammad was better than jesus or moses or any other prophet peace be upon them of The Creator.

If a Muslim says Mohammad or any other prophet was/Is better than any other prophet then he is cinsidered to be Not a Muslim. As every prophet holds Equal importance as taught by the Quran Mohammad Moses Abraham Adam all are Equal as prophets of the Almighty. Peace be upon them all.

 

[jupiter2007]

time waiste, trolling for sake of trolling??
He made his points....and no backlash from Molvis and Church.
Move on to better things....

 

[925boy]

So what? He is politician not historian.

He is the leader of a country.

 

[django]

PM Imran Khan should refrain from these kind of ignorant statements and continue to put in the very honest shift he is putting in vis a vis the economy!

 

[Irfan Baloch]

Prime Minister Imran Khan on Tuesday draw the ire of hundreds of social media users, including political leaders, after a video clip of his controversial statement regarding Hazrat Esa (AS) [Jesus Christ] went viral over the internet.

“Moses got some mention, but Jesus Christ has no mention in history,” he said while addressing the opening ceremony of the two-day International Rehmatul-lil-Alameen Conference in Islamabad.

WATCH VIDEO:




https://twitter.com/intent/like?tweet_id=1064856924074721280


Ever since the clip of the premier’s address was shared over social media, a number of netizens took to Twitter and criticised him for what they said was PM Khan’s “ignorance”

https://twitter.com/x/status/1064936637560487938

https://twitter.com/x/status/1064866648677629954

https://twitter.com/x/status/1064868763902926850

https://twitter.com/x/status/1064869591745208320

Among the many who condemned the remarks, was Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leader and former minister Ahsan Iqbal.

“Quran has many references of Hazrat Isa (AS); how will trolls defend this crazy statement of IK?” he tweeted.




Ahsan Iqbal✔@betterpakistan
Quran has many references of Hazrat Isa (as) will trolls defend this crazy statement of IK?



It merits a mention here that the two-day conference titled, ‘Finality of Prophethood and responsibilities of Muslims in light of the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)’, is the 43rd conference aimed at promoting religious harmony, tolerance, brotherhood and equality, respect for humanity, non-violence, unity, reconciliation and culture of dialogue.



https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/20...ver-controversial-remarks-about-jesus-christ/

i am surprised by ignorant comment. is this a selective clipping to criticize him or did he elaborate what he meant by such outrageous claim?
I would say yes Jesus has no mention in the Hindu history or Jewish history but as a world defining world history goes Jesus has world altering impact.

 

[xyxmt]

A non Issue

 

[313ghazi]

He didn't say anything controversial, if you watch the who video you'll see he is talking about the impact the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) had on history. However he shouldn't have said what he did, because of it's scope for being misinterpreted. It was very clumsy.

There was really no need for that sentence in there. It would have been much better to say of all religious figures in the world the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is the most documented. That would be true; there are many historical documents referencing the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), including some from non-Muslim sources.

An unprofessional moment, which is a shame because we should be talking about all the excellent stuff he said during the rest of his speech. This faux pas is entirely on him.

 

[Irfan Baloch]

Haven't seen the complete video. Just the clip. Not sure what point he was trying to make

exactly


what if he has said

it will be fooling to think that Jesus has no mention in history


and someone edits out his preceding comment. people do that to make fun of celebrities and politicians this is serious

 

[doorstar]

every tom dick and harry busy issuing fatway and trying to outdo each others "piety and holiness" instead of watching the original full video available here on pdf

i am surprised by ignorant comment. is this a selective clipping to criticize him or did he elaborate what he meant by such outrageous claim?
I would say yes Jesus has no mention in the Hindu history or Jewish history but as a world defining world history goes Jesus has world altering impact.