Dude think this. How much u want to spend on daily basis.
These are the kind of arguements that come up when lack of military knowledge is evident.
If you are talking about current scenario, then its mortar fire on LOC mostly which is damaging Indian posts. The Big guns are also used but when mortar is doing the job, then big guns are rested. Mortars are used for many reasons:
1. They have an adequate range of upto 5-6 km, though 2-3 km is an effective range.
2. Calibre is small, usually 81mm, so ammunition handling is easy. setting up is easy and can be fired from non-prepared positions if properly levelled.
3. Can be used by front line troops in forward posts.
4. Can be re-located easily after firing a few rounds.
The point is to get the job done. whether its done by mortar or howitzer, whether by 2-3 rounds or a dozen rounds. The feasibility report for taking out a target is NOT para-metered on "daily spending" of rounds but on:
1. Priority
2. Distance
3. Elevation
4. Terrain
5. Weather
6. Counter fire by enemy
7. LOS or NLOS (line of sight or non-line of sight)
and a few other factors. Calculating these helps in selecting the weapon type to be used.
When the weapon is chosen, a few factors again come in consideration.like:
1. Transporting of weapon to selected location.
2. Time taken to setup, fire and re-locate.
3. Number of troops involved.
4. The amount of explosive used in the shell/Round with respect to shell's over all weight.
5. Minimum number of rounds to achieve hit and impact.
For reference, 81mm shell is 4.5KG in weight and has an effective kill radius of 35 meters. 155mm shell is 43 KG and has an effective kill radius of upto 50 meters.
Kill zone and blast radius are different. Blast radius is obviously larger than kill zone.
Pakistan uses 130mm on LOC whose shell weight is 33 KG.
If there are ten Indian posts in coverage radius of a certain 130mm howitzer battery (6 Guns), do the maths and calculate the amount of rounds needed to render the posts useless and destroyed with less than 30 minutes of firing?
The range of Pakistani 130mm Gun is 27 Km.
Also calculate the same required to stop Indians from setting up new posts in place of destroyed posts?
You should get the answer to the meaning-less question you have asked me which i have highlighted.
I mean India could shell hell lots of shells at you for more months. How much can you afford?
Another babyish question void of any military know-how.
It cost money, man power etc. We have don't used all our artillery guns in kargil while you all what have. Yet what was the outcome. . . To validate my point go read some good article on ceasefire agreement, kargil wars etc.
If you want to discuss Kargil war and the usage of artillery in Kargil war then open a new thread.
Pakistan has different types of 105mm, 122mm, 130mm, 155mm and 203mm calibre guns in its arsenal and yet it only used a few types of guns in Kargil war. So most of the Artillery arsenal wasnt even used as it was deployed in all other sectors.
India already stared mass procurement from day -1 of Modi government. And we are preparing another batch worth one billion in fast track procurement basis keeping China in mind. Which is totally about in ports. We too churn out lots of shells ammunition.
No matter if Indian churns out million shells per day, it depends upon number of targets present and the correct weapon to take them out in minimum time with minimum rounds used.
Do u see my point. I am fed up with mouth feeding of basic informations.
I am already tired of reading your non-sense.
I think we Indians are more aware of defence issues than whole lots of Pakistanis
Thats the funniest thing i have read all day.....yes mate....your military knowledge is shining everywhere in your post...lol how much you can spent and willing to afford...lol