What's new

Japan Defence Forum

Equipment of the Japan Ground Self Defense Force

A) INFANTRY WEAPONS

SCK/ Minebea 9mm Pistol:
1024px-Sig_P220_JGSDF_9mm_Pistol.JPG




Minebea Machine Pistol:
1024px-Minebea_9mm_submachine_gun_20120408.jpg




Howa Type 89 Assault Rifle,
Howa_type_89_01.jpg




Howa Type 64 Battle Rifle,
1920px-Type_64_Rifle.jpg




Sumitomo MINIM 5.56 mm Machine Gun,
1920px-M249_FN_MINIMI_DA-SC-85-11586_c1.jpg




Sumitomo Type 62,
NTK-62+%286%29.jpg




Sumitomo M2,
1280px-PEO_M2E2-QCB_HMG.jpg




Howa Type 96, Automatic Grenade Launcher,
Type96_40mm_Automatic_Grenad_Gun.JPG


Type96_40mm_Automatic_Grenad_Gun_on_Vehicle.JPG




Type 06 Rifle Grenade,
Type_06_rifle_grenade.jpg
 
.
More on JGSDF equipment,

Forest_Light_2013_Day2_003.jpg

M27 IAR を使用する海兵隊員も多く見掛けた。


Forest_Light_2013_Day2_004.jpg

Forest_Light_2013_Day2_008.jpg



Forest_Light_2013_Day2_009.jpg



Forest_Light_2013_Day2_010.jpg






Forest_Light_2013_Day2_014.jpg



Forest_Light_2013_Day2_055.jpg



Forest_Light_2013_Day2_016.jpg



Forest_Light_2013_Day2_015.jpg



Forest_Light_2013_Day2_019.jpg
 
.
The Yomiuri Shimbun

Is it time to stop resorting to the enactment of special measures laws to allow the Self-Defense Forces to be dispatched after a serious situation has erupted overseas?

A proposal is being floated within the government and the ruling parties to enact a permanent law regarding the overseas dispatch of the SDF. The move is meant to address the need to enact relevant legislation to deal with the expansion of the SDF’s logistical support for U.S. and other forces, which became possible with the Cabinet approval in July of the government’s new constitutional interpretation that allows limited exercise of right of collective self-defense.

During intensive interpellation in the House of Councillors, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe hinted at his positive stance on permanent legislation, saying the government would consider “whether to have a permanent law or special measures laws” regarding the SDF’s international peace cooperation activities.

Two special measures laws have been enacted in the past in connection with the overseas dispatch of the SDF. One was the counterterrorism special measures law enacted after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States, which allowed the SDF to take on refueling missions in the Indian Ocean. The other was the 2003 special measures law on assisting with the reconstruction of Iraq, which made it possible for the SDF to engage in air transportation missions and such humanitarian activities as supplying water.

Both laws were enforced over fixed periods and have since expired.

If the Diet enacts comprehensive permanent legislation instead of revising the International Peacekeeping Activities Cooperation Law and other pertinent laws, it will be not necessary to enact special measures laws in response to pressing situations, thereby allowing the swift, flexible dispatch of the SDF abroad.

The enactment of permanent legislation would be a promising step to help put the Abe administration’s strategy of “proactive contribution to peace” into action.

SDF activities expanded

The government’s new interpretation limits the definition of activities constituting “integration with the use of force”—banned under the Constitution—to SDF logistical and other activities at locations where battles are actually taking place. This has made it possible for SDF personnel to rescue foreign troops that are under attack, if the foreign country agrees.

Both measures are significant in expanding and improving the SDF’s international peacekeeping activities, as well as enhancing their effectiveness.

Thus far, the SDF’s activities have been limited to noncombat zones, a concept that the world will not accept. Until now, even if a foreign military asked for SDF rescue operations, Japan had no option but to decline or go to the site to assess the situation and resort to the emergency step of using arms for self-defense if SDF personnel were in danger.

After the Self-Defense Forces Law was revised in 2006, international peacekeeping cooperation activities became a primary duty of the SDF. In 2008, the Liberal Democratic Party and New Komeito considered permanent legislation but failed to reach an agreement and gave up on having the Diet enact such a law. The government’s new interpretation is a prime opportunity to enact permanent legislation.

Such legislation would help the government put together and present an overall picture of the SDF’s international activities. It is necessary to put such activities into two categories—those conducted with and those conducted without a resolution by the U.N. Security Council—and restrict SDF dispatch abroad through such measures as requiring prior Diet approval.

We urge the government and the ruling parties to positively consider permanent legislation.

(From The Yomiuri Shimbun, Aug. 23, 2014)
 
. . . . . .
Construction update of the DDH-184, the 2nd Izumo-Class Light Carrier [Helicopter Carrier]


:smitten:


d9f65af0a70f83e0ca9ec174cdd8d8e9_zps6b51573e.jpg



22ddh-000.jpg



f0245050_51a5cc2c857ae.jpg



5052504.jpg



22ddh-002.jpg



SPECS

Displacement: 27,000 tons (full load)
Length: 815 ft
Width: 125 ft
Beam: 110 ft
Propulsion: 4 GE LM2500 COGAG, 2 shafts
Speed: 30+ knots
Crew: 970 (Includes Air Wing)
Air Wing Stated Capability:
- Up to 16 ASW/SAR helicopters
Air Wing Fixed Capability:
- 15 F-35B JSF
- 04 V-22 Osprey
- 04 ASW & SAR Helos
Armament:
- 2 x 21 Cell RAM
- 2 x 20mm Phalanx CIWS
Elevators: 2
 
.
Australian, Japanese soldiers to train together in historic first

20120513adf8225051_%2049_460x306px.ashx



In a historic first, Australian troops will travel to Japan to take part in an earthquake response training exercise.

Defence force personnel will travel to Japan to take part in the Minchinoku Alert exercise, a scenario which will provide training for an earthquake disaster, News Ltd has reported.

The agreement was reached during Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's recent visit to Australia.

RSL president Ken Doolan told News Ltd the league's stance was to support the defence relationship between Australia and Japan.

However, he said some RSL members would not be pleased with the news.

He said Australia had already sent serving personnel to Japan in 2011 as part of a tsunami relief effort.

The announcement of the training exercise comes as Japan and Australia seek to strengthen their military relationship and Japan turns away from its post-WWII pacifism policy.


Read more at Australian, Japanese soldiers to train together in historic first
 
. . .
U.N. sizes up Japan as peacekeeper


NEW YORK – Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is forging ahead with a plan that could increase the deployment of the Self-Defense Forces overseas under new parameters, and the United Nations welcomes a national debate in Japan on the issue as it views the potential to improve peacekeeping efforts with Tokyo’s help.

“The broader policy debate that is going on in your country with respect to Japan’s engagement in the further peacekeeping is something that we welcome very much,” Ameerah Haq, U.N. undersecretary-general for field support, said in an interview at her office.

“It solidifies the partnership between Japan and the U.N. and Japan’s contribution to the peace and security agenda of the U.N.”

On July 1, Abe’s Cabinet made a decision to reinterpret, rather than amend, the Constitution in a way that allows Tokyo to exercise the right to collective self-defense, or coming to the aid of an ally under armed attack.

The divisive decision triggered debates about the pacifist Constitution, which had previously been interpreted as limiting the use of force strictly to its own defense.

The decision could lead to the relaxation of Japan’s strict rules on SDF weapons use.

As it now stands, Japan is the second-largest contributor to the peacekeeping budget at the international body after the United States. Tokyo provides 10.83 percent of its annual funding and has dispatched troops to non-war zone locations in Cambodia, Mozambique, the Golan Heights and East Timor.

Japan is currently involved in a peacekeeping operation in South Sudan where several hundred members of an engineering unit have been installing infrastructure since 2012.

Over half of the 17 U.N. peacekeeping missions are in Africa, where the need is greatest.

Haq pointed out that the U.N.’s demands go beyond the need for “enablers” — those who help build critical infrastructure. With looser restrictions on use of force, Japanese troops could perform various roles with the infantry, police units and in other staff positions also involving planning, she said.

More boots are required on the ground in Africa, particularly in countries like Mali and the Central African Republic.

When U.S. President Barack Obama met Abe in Tokyo in April, the prime minister was approached to actively engage more of Tokyo’s troops on the continent, according to an unnamed U.S. government source. Abe is said to be considering the request, which Haq said would contribute “very positively” to peacekeeping efforts.

The undersecretary general hopes Tokyo could also assist by providing equipment and training. Haq highlighted how lengthy deployments from distant countries like Japan, where troops may be tasked to build roads or airports, for instance, are problematic.

Setting up such missions typically takes awhile, and much time is lost moving heavy machinery, potentially putting more civilians at risk in the process.

The head of field support suggested that if Tokyo supplied engineering equipment, for example, it could help alleviate the situation. By sending machinery to a regional hub in Uganda, contingents from other African countries could be trained there to use it and then be quickly dispatched to conflict zones as needs arise.

The equipment is usually only necessary for the first 12 to 18 months, after which it could be shipped to other zones on an as-needed basis.

“The difficulty that we have is a number of troop contributing countries don’t have that equipment,” she explained. “This is something that Japan, I think, can play a very important role.”

Haq listed numerous missions in places like Darfur, Congo, Mali, the Central African Republic and even more in South Sudan where the Japanese could have potential roles to play.

As the annual budget creeps up to cope with rising conflicts, the field support chief is pushing to streamline operations by incorporating new technology, as well as making operations more environmentally friendly and modern.

Simple technologies, such as new types of tents used by Norwegian troops, which are insulated and quickly set up and broken down, could have far reaching benefits to other missions in harsh climates.

More sophisticated technologies, such as the unmanned aerial vehicles, have also proven successful in the Democratic Republic of Congo and have broader applications elsewhere.

Haq highlighted the success of a mission in Lebanon where 30 percent of the energy is generated by a solar farm.

As a nation recognized for “cutting edge” technology, she sees room for Japan’s contributions in that area as well.

Against the backdrop of efforts to make operations “smarter,” Haq is quick to describe how peacekeepers have dramatically changed over the last 70 years.

“The challenges are huge because of the complexities,” she explained, noting how the days of peacekeepers sitting on a border with binoculars monitoring are largely gone.

Modern peacekeepers must operate nimbly in new environments. They are often required to mediate with nonstate actors and rebel groups in collapsed states as well as cope with threats from improvised explosive devices in precarious security environments to carry out mandates to protect civilians in dangerous circumstances.

Meanwhile, the international body must wait and see if Abe’s plan is supported and whether more Japanese troops with expanded roles will become a reality.


U.N. sizes up Japan as peacekeeper | The Japan Times
 
.
You didn't order F35B,and F35A can't land on a DDH.
F35B is not a good 5G. for DDHs.

F35B can not put a ASM-2 inside of its body, so if it want to attack other carriers, it cannot be a stealth aircraft. Some ASM like YJ12 has 7 meters long, there is no way to ask F35 to carry such weapons. However J15 does. DDH and F35B together is only enough for self defence, under the watching of E767.
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom