J-9 comparison

[grey boy 2]

Hi Shchinese, I could not find more info on J-10 and LAVI connection but found some thing real on the following link:-
Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI) Lavi
it simply states :-

The Chinese Chengdu J-10 (F-10) seems to draw heavily on the Lavi program. However, a close examination of the model of the J-10 shows nothing more than an old technology fighter with the shape of a modern one. A prototype was in the final stage of construction at the end of 1997 and Israeli and Russian companies were competing to provide the radar and the associate air-to-air missiles and air-to-ground weapons.

Few more links from Asia Times :
Asia Times

At least paste your stuff in an honest manner;

At the beginning of the nineties there were rumors that Israel had delivered a Lavi to South Africa.
The Chinese Chengdu J-10 (F-10) seems to draw heavily on the Lavi program. However, a close examination of the model of the J-10 shows nothing more than an old technology fighter with the shape of a modern one. A prototype was in the final stage of construction at the end of 1997 and Israeli and Russian companies were competing to provide the radar and the associate air-to-air missiles and air-to-ground weapons.

The other link was dated back in 2002, thats really creditable source

after 7 years ?

 

[deep.ocean]

At least paste your stuff in an honest manner;

At the beginning of the nineties there were rumors that Israel had delivered a Lavi to South Africa.
The Chinese Chengdu J-10 (F-10) seems to draw heavily on the Lavi program. However, a close examination of the model of the J-10 shows nothing more than an old technology fighter with the shape of a modern one. A prototype was in the final stage of construction at the end of 1997 and Israeli and Russian companies were competing to provide the radar and the associate air-to-air missiles and air-to-ground weapons.

The other link was dated back in 2002, thats really creditable source

after 7 years ?

What do u mean by after 7 years.. j 10 program is not started after 2002 it was started way back in early 80s.. so you are saying that in these 7 years you have changed your J-10 to real F-16 killer... By simply watching J-10 flying we can not predict it is way better than any 4 th gen fighter...Can you provide any link on j-10s capabilites...

 

[shchinese]

What do u mean by after 7 years.. j 10 program is not started after 2002 it was started way back in early 80s.. so you are saying that in these 7 years you have changed your J-10 to real F-16 killer... By simply watching J-10 flying we can not predict it is way better than any 4 th gen fighter...Can you provide any link on j-10s capabilites...

but there is one thing for sure: J-10 has been in active service for years, while your LCA is still not ready.

one day even when you have the LCAs ready for combat, do you really believe it is remotely comparable to J-10?

check L-15, that is our answer to LCA

 

[grey boy 2]

What do u mean by after 7 years.. j 10 program is not started after 2002 it was started way back in early 80s.. so you are saying that in these 7 years you have changed your J-10 to real F-16 killer... By simply watching J-10 flying we can not predict it is way better than any 4 th gen fighter...Can you provide any link on j-10s capabilites...

Actually i don't know how hard its for you to google J10 A, B.

But anyway here you go;

Jian-10 (J-10, F-10) Multirole Fighter Aircraft - SinoDefence.com

 

[shchinese]

we should finalise the spec for J-10b as soon as possible and provide Pak air force this bird to counter their neo-nazi neighbor india.

 

[deep.ocean]

but there is one thing for sure: J-10 has been in active service for years, while your LCA is still not ready.

one day even when you have the LCAs ready for combat, do you really believe it is remotely comparable to J-10?

check L-15, that is our answer to LCA

Do u know wat world say about j-10 that is Junk -10. J-10 in active service does not mean Super Duper fighter plane.. We never heard IAF worried about this Plane.....

 

[shchinese]

Do u know wat world say about j-10 that is Junk -10. J-10 in active service does not mean Super Duper fighter plane.. We never heard IAF worried about this Plane.....

because your iaf is not qualified to face such challenges.

as already mentioned a lot of times, the airbases operated by your iaf are completed covered by our CJ-10 missiles, not to mention our DF missiles.

tell me how many of fighters are combat ready given the facts above? you need to build a lot more "underground" airbases.

 

[deep.ocean]

because your iaf is not qualified to face such challenges.

as already mentioned a lot of times, the airbases operated by your iaf are completed covered by our CJ-10 missiles, not to mention our DF missiles.

tell me how many of fighters are combat ready given the facts above? you need to build a lot more "underground" airbases.

So that means both can be fired from J10? or this thread is again hijacked to show might of great super power..

 

[shchinese]

So that means both can be fired from J10? or this thread is again hijacked to show might of great super power..

it means we even don't need to risk the lives of our pilots. we can use land based weapons to disable most of your airbases.

when we fight with Vietnam in the 1970s, we didn't use our air force, because a backward country like vietnam doesn't qualify to see our air force. for the same reason, india is just a piece of ****, why we should use our J-10/J-11b?

 

[deep.ocean]

it means we even don't need to risk the lives of our pilots. we can use land based weapons to disable most of your airbases.

when we fight with Vietnam in the 1970s, we didn't use our air force, because a backward country like vietnam doesn't qualify to see our air force. for the same reason, india is just a piece of ****, why we should use our J-10/J-11b?

Isn't true that ur all might failed against great vietnamese army.. or you just lost bcoz j 10 was not ready at that time....

 

[shchinese]

Isn't true that ur all might failed against great vietnamese army.. or you just lost bcoz j 10 was not ready at that time....

india even won the 1962 war, I know that, typical india propaganda.

 

[gambit]

it means we even don't need to risk the lives of our pilots. we can use land based weapons to disable most of your airbases.

when we fight with Vietnam in the 1970s, we didn't use our air force, because a backward country like vietnam doesn't qualify to see our air force. for the same reason, india is just a piece of ****, why we should use our J-10/J-11b?

Isn't true that ur all might failed against great vietnamese army.. or you just lost bcoz j 10 was not ready at that time....

What the kid said was pure nonsense and simply mindless rhetorics. Assault from the 3rd dimension, be it from the air above or from underwater, is an advantage one MUST exploit and whenever possible -- use. Of course there are highly unique situations where it may not be in the best interests of the conflict that air power is employed, be it from political or military consideration. He is just talking out of his southern orifice.

 

[gambit]

I don't talk vietnemese morons like you

The reason why the PLAAF was nonexistant in the Sino-Viet war was because the PLAAF was nowhere as capable and experienced as even the South Vietnamese Air Force, when South Vietnam existed. Keep in mind that in the Vietnam War, the US-ARVN alliance lost more aircrafts against ground anti-aircraft efforts than from air-air individual combat. So by the time of that brief Sino-Viet border conflict, North Vietnamese missileers were more trained and experienced than many others, PLAAF aircrafts would have been swiftly POOF-ed.

it is clear to every one that I have problems with indian policies/policy makers, but still I respect them as a great and old civilization that has a shared history with Pak. however when it comes Vietnam, sorry dude, that is just a piece of **** in the entire human history.

This just goes to show how juvenile you really are. You have no experience in these subjects so leave this to the adults.

 

[shchinese]

The reason why the PLAAF was nonexistant in the Sino-Viet war was because the PLAAF was nowhere as capable and experienced as even the South Vietnamese Air Force, when South Vietnam existed. Keep in mind that in the Vietnam War, the US-ARVN alliance lost more aircrafts against ground anti-aircraft efforts than from air-air individual combat. So by the time of that brief Sino-Viet border conflict, North Vietnamese missileers were more trained and experienced than many others, PLAAF aircrafts would have been swiftly POOF-ed.
/QUOTE]

because my uncle and many other smart and brave Chinese ware there helping your guys. do you seriously believe you can win the war without China?

when we captured your cities/defense works during our war in 1970s, a lot of solders went mad seeing the defense works ware built using the rice provided by China and most of your weapons carry the sign "made in China".

is the current impression on your armed forces.

 

[indiatech]

The reason why the PLAAF was nonexistant in the Sino-Viet war was because the PLAAF was nowhere as capable and experienced as even the South Vietnamese Air Force, when South Vietnam existed. Keep in mind that in the Vietnam War, the US-ARVN alliance lost more aircrafts against ground anti-aircraft efforts than from air-air individual combat. So by the time of that brief Sino-Viet border conflict, North Vietnamese missileers were more trained and experienced than many others, PLAAF aircrafts would have been swiftly POOF-ed.
/QUOTE]

because my uncle and many other smart and brave Chinese ware there helping your guys. do you seriously believe you can win the war without China?

when we captured your cities/defense works during our war in 1970s, a lot of solders went mad seeing the defense works ware built using the rice provided by China and most of your weapons carry the sign "made in China".

is the current impression on your armed forces.

China enjoyed its permanent membership in UNSC after UN snatched the membership from taiwan in 1971. Two of the major funders of the UN , germany and Japan are not even given the membership. What a joke.

CPC has enjoyes a lot form the toil and affort of the Nationalists. First, the Nationalists saved the country and CPC drove them out of the country. Then snatch their UN membership.