What's new

It's Official: The US is a Leading Terrorist State

. . . .
Thats not the reason why I posted it. Pakistan finds it mention just once...and the article clearly states that its about America that we are discussing.


Being number one in the world means that you have to do both the clean jobs AND dirty jobs.

One of the most thankless and dirty jobs on global level is to do fire-fighting.

There are arsonists all over the world.

you are damned if you put out a fire and punish the arsonist
you will be damned if you don't.
 
. . . .
If the article is right, then we have second culprit aka Pakistan:

An international poll found that the United States is ranked far in the lead as “the biggest threat to world peace today,” far ahead of second-place Pakistan, with no one else even close.

If the article is wrong, then leave the US alone..

What is a sauce for the goose should be the sauce for the gender ..

and you wonder why Pakistan, because Pakistani politician find it a privilege to be used and abused by USA
 
. .
I am not convinced he was alive at that time for US to kill him,

Source: It's Official: The US is a Leading Terrorist State | Page 4

If he was not there, why would you use above sentence?
Are you a kindergarden one?

I don't see how not being convinced that he was alive = saying he was there. I can see how you are trying to twist and turn words, making your own assumptions just to win an internet argument. If you had anything solid to show that OBL was killed by US in Pak in May 2011, I think you would have been able to do it by now, instead of asking 'so you think he was there' , 'but you just said this which means that', bla bla bla.
 
. .
I don't see how not being convinced that he was alive = saying he was there. I can see how you are trying to twist and turn words, making your own assumptions just to win an internet argument. If you had anything solid to show that OBL was killed by US in Pak in May 2011, I think you would have been able to do it by now, instead of asking 'so you think he was there' , 'but you just said this which means that', bla bla bla.

What in the hell is stopping Pakistan to make the inquiry public?

And the Al Jazeera link that I furnished, you have not gone through with. Feeling like a bull in the China shop type?

The US SEAL marine has written a book about it, The movie is out about him, and you are still crawling, instead of walking!
 
.
What in the hell is stopping Pakistan to make the inquiry public?

And the Al Jazeera link that I furnished, you have not gone through with. Feeling like a bull in the China shop type?

The US SEAL marine has written a book about it, The movie is out about him, and you are still crawling, instead of walking!
I did say I will read that link when I have time did I not? Instead of leaving it there you started asking 'so you believe it happened', 'you believed he was there', if that link had all the answers I don't see the need to continue with all those questions. Oh really, US marine had a book, and there was a movie, why did you not mention that Obama himself said US killed Osama while you are at it.
 
.
I did say I will read that link when I have time did I not? Instead of leaving it there you started asking 'so you believe it happened', 'you believed he was there', if that link had all the answers I don't see the need to continue with all those questions. Oh really, US marine had a book, and there was a movie, why did you not mention that Obama himself said US killed Osama while you are at it.

So what is your concern NOW, if I said so (The underlined)??
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom