What's new

It's official. No more Arjuns!!!

-What happpen Sir?
-LCA is junk. HAHAHAHA
-But thread is about Arjun MBT
-Arjun is Junk. HAHAHAHA
-How do you know, Sir?
-It is not being used by India though their scientist has made it. HAHAHAHA
-Like JF 17, Sir??? China made it but they are not using it!!!!
-China is junk. HAHAHAHA

Your a Moron ha ha ha
 
.
Well, Its not official yet..... if it was then our media would have torn apart the DRDO into small tiny little pieces ..... Arjun Is still very much alive...
 
. .
HAHAHHA HAHAH

Thanks. Just wanted to laugh at something that we already knew years ago.

On to the LCA...
When LCA fails there will be hell to pay. Already the Arjun failure will reflect really poorly onto the Indians. How much money do you think they will get for the research on the Mark-II?

LCA has tougher competition than the T-90. The IA has set precedent for the IAF. If they think along the same lines that there is no need to push a local industry ahead, then LCA will be in similar hot waters.
 
.
i think failures pave the way for success... at least we know the ways now what not to do.. how not to make a tank. any one who is making a devise or machine at the very first attempt and continue the pattern is either copying it or leasing it...
 
.
So anyone who displays your logic is a Moron???:lol:

no I think he can relate to you way better than to my logic, but you guys need t stop riding on Arjun's junk seriously

EDIT: by the way you guys are bringing real bad publicity to your gods/dieties, next time pick a name that eases the pain/embarrasment
 
.
When LCA fails there will be hell to pay. Already the Arjun failure will reflect really poorly onto the Indians. How much money do you think they will get for the research on the Mark-II?

LCA has tougher competition than the T-90. The IA has set precedent for the IAF. If they think along the same lines that there is no need to push a local industry ahead, then LCA will be in similar hot waters.

Funny how many of the projects India takes fails and none of the Pakistani projects fail be it the missile or nuke's.
 
.
When LCA fails there will be hell to pay. Already the Arjun failure will reflect really poorly onto the Indians. How much money do you think they will get for the research on the Mark-II?

LCA has tougher competition than the T-90. The IA has set precedent for the IAF. If they think along the same lines that there is no need to push a local industry ahead, then LCA will be in similar hot waters.


There You go, what happend with Arjun was , IA did not want more arjun as it had T-90 to do that role which it does more effectively Than what Arjun could probably do. And Arjun Cannot be replaced with T-72 becoz 5000 crores are being spent on T-72 upgrades...

Where as In LCA ,IAF Pilots are impressed with its performance.... LCA is not complete yet... its radars are undergoing evaluation , and Every other tests are successful ... Well Indian airforce has already ordered for 40 aircrafts and Navy ordered 20 aircrafts.... and once it gets IOC , IAF can get more...
 
Last edited:
.
no I think he can relate to you way better than to my logic, but you guys need t stop riding on Arjun's junk seriously

The army already is operating to your so called Junk buddy... And the Arjun Mark II is in development phase... And We will not get tired up by some silly criticizing from the neighbourhood ....
 
. .
-What happpen Sir?
-LCA is junk. HAHAHAHA
-But thread is about Arjun MBT
-Arjun is Junk. HAHAHAHA
-How do you know, Sir?
-It is not being used by India though their scientist has made it. HAHAHAHA
-Like JF 17, Sir??? China made it but they are not using it!!!!
-China is junk. HAHAHAHA

Pak has got a big order of JF-17 from Egypt and there is so many potential buyer such as Azerbaijan, Iran,Syria, etc.

How about Arjun and LCA?:azn:
 
.
Pak has got a big order of JF-17 from Egypt and there is so many potential buyer such as Azerbaijan, Iran,Syria, etc.

How about Arjun and LCA?:azn:

Key word.

Was any contract signed regarding JF-17 between Egypt and Pakistan&China.
 
.
The army already is operating to your so called Junk buddy... And the Arjun Mark II is in development phase... And We will not get tired up by some silly criticizing from the neighbourhood ....

Haha dude give me a break 124 tanks after a quarter century worth of work.. This tank was supposed to be inducted in 1000's, you know we are going to stop criticising cuz it actually works way better for us if you induct Arjun

Honestly tho you'd be better of making a indegineous khota, your army will be super comfortable with them since they'll be able to relate on a whole different level and DRDO will finally have something that works
 
.
Anyway, I think it's a wise decision of India, Loss of money is better than loss of the soilder's life in battlefield, facing the reality is better than face saving:coffee:
 
.
There You go, what happend with Arjun was , IA did not want more arjun as it had T-90 to do that role which it does more effectively Than what Arjun could probably do. And Arjun Cannot be replaced with T-72 becoz 5000 crores are being spent on T-72 upgrades...

That is no reason. The T-90 could perform its role better than the Arjun is why Arjun failed. Don't make it sound that they had 2 of the same caliber MBTs and so they went like "Hey why bother?"

Also if there is nothing disastrously wrong with an Inhouse project there is enough reason to support the local industry to make moves towards being self reliant.

You have to admit LCA has had the equal number of delays with the IAF already having said it is not really interested in it. So there is a good chance of things going south there as well.

The triple constraint rule for all projects in which they all work in

1. Cost
2. Time
3. Quality

DRDO has botched up in all three areas.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom