Of course it's Assad's mess, he's the head of state, isn't he?
Look, let's be honest, no matter which source I post, you're simply going to call it propaganda. You aren't going to be satisfied no matter what I post, so there is little point in posting anything besides what I've already given you. Prove me wrong, which source would satisfy you? Don't point towards a Syrian or Russian source, they're just as bias as your claim is towards CNN and BBC.
I never let al qaeda or the Saudis or the hook, that's just your assumptions, in fact, I clearly mentioned that they're also a problem. I'm not going personal, I'm calling it like how I see it. You keep saying my argument doesn't have legs to stand on, but the fact is that you haven't really given me a reason to believe you, and the evidence points towards you being completely wrong.
Let's face facts, this war started before al qaeda got involved, don't try and twist logic to suit your misinformation. Both the Syrian government and the rebels are guilty, but I would say that Assad is worse, because he had the means to end the war before it began, instead he made it worse. He also enlisted the help for foreign terrorists, namely hezbullah, which is something you seem to be completely ignoring. Why are foreigners fighting on behave of Assad, if Assad has public support, as you claim? It's because he doesn't, and needs foreign mercenaries to remain in power.
I find it completely hilarious that you're calling my posts a joke when you have brought nothing to the conversation, and instead have been doing nothing but leveling accusations against me, and making up situations that have no basis in reality.
Well, whatever. If you don't want to listen, that's your problem, not mine.
@
Manticore can you help me out here?