Israel is Capable of Taking Out S-300 and S-400, But Won't Do This – Publicist

[Ultima Thule]

I study in Canada. Then I go back to China to develop China into super power and take on White people.

Canada is very advanced. Abrams tank fire control computer is made in Canada. Canada CF-105 was the best plane in the world in the 1950s.

not more advance than USA, USA is called university of the world, and Canada buys weapons/Tech from USA, CF-105 was history canceled project case closed @undertakerwwefan if you hates so much white people why you're studying in Canada , Canada is full of white people @undertakerwwefan , go back to China for studying @undertakerwwefan

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

And, so has Turkey....

 

[Vortex]

Can you all stop off topic posting please ?

Thanks

 

[Ajaxpaul]

If Israel wants to test S300 or S400, first they will send their UAVs. I bet UAVs are all over the conflict zone. Russia knows this. Why waste missiles ? What will Russia gain by pissing off Israel ?

 

[Darth Vader]

Many Countries have the Capability to Take out S300 and S400 But Problem is at What cost ?
These are really Capable Weapon SYSTEM if we follow the HYPE but to take these out , Enemy will have to get some punishment before they even get close and most probably will be protected by other assets as well.
Always better to wait another day unless you have no other option

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Serbia 1960s Kub shot down F-117 and F-16. Let's see how those super duper F-35 fare against S-300PM2.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Serbia 1960s Kub shot down F-117 and F-16. Let's see how those super duper F-35 fare against S-300PM2.

Let wait and see, and remember F-117 only a attack jet, its only defense is relying on Stealth with no ECM, EW, RWR gear, and Serbian first detected F-117 on IR sensor, and than get the coordinate with different radars (Network centric capability), as for F-16 you Russian jets also destroyed wit own old soviet tech, so nothing special on downing of F-16 over Serbia, more Soviet/Russian fighter jets were/are destroyed in wars than its counterparts, USA/Western fighter jets @undertakerwwefan

 

[zectech]

I study in Canada. Then I go back to China to develop China into super power and take on White people.

Canada is very advanced. Abrams tank fire control computer is made in Canada. Canada CF-105 was the best plane in the world in the 1950s.

The Alex Jonestown "whites" who hate the Chinese are generally from the British Isles, France, Poland and parts of Germany. These are not your Caucasian whites from Southern Italy and Nordic Whites from Sweden, these do like the Chinese. Racism among whites is found from Western Europe to Eastern Europe, if you look at the political parties. Places like Sweden and Southern Italy don't hate the Chinese.

 

[FuturePAF]

Per current USAF strategy; S-300/400 can be "Neutralized" by launch MALDS with AESA DRFM to jam radar transmissions, followed by JSOW barrages to knock out radars and launchers. for USN; EF-18G Growlers can be used in place of MALDS and F-35s can launch JSOW barrages. If the missile actually gets a chance to launche on a USAF or USN Fighter they have their AESA radars, Self Protection Jamming Pods, and tactics to jink and jive to "Notch" The SAM. Also cyber warfare can be used to defeat the S-300/S-400, and launching decoys like UAVs to draw enemy fire as well as revealing the location of their radars and batteries. Pakistan needs to learn from the Chinese and Turks on the S-300/S-400 and Western Sam Systems Respectively.

 

[KAL-EL]

Can you all stop off topic posting please ?

Thanks

^^This^^

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Per current USAF strategy; S-300/400 can be "Neutralized" by launch MALDS with AESA DRFM to jam radar transmissions, followed by JSOW barrages to knock out radars and launchers. for USN; EF-18G Growlers can be used in place of MALDS and F-35s can launch JSOW barrages. If the missile actually gets a chance to launche on a USAF or USN Fighter they have their AESA radars, Self Protection Jamming Pods, and tactics to jink and jive to "Notch" The SAM. Also cyber warfare can be used to defeat the S-300/S-400, and launching decoys like UAVs to draw enemy fire as well as revealing the location of their radars and batteries. Pakistan needs to learn from the Chinese and Turks on the S-300/S-400 and Western Sam Systems Respectively.

Even if they can blow up every S-300 / S-400, they still can't take ground. You need brave soldiers to take ground. American soldiers and Israeli soldiers are far from brave. 1 casualty and their leader loses election. That is the weakness of democratic countries.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Even if they can blow up every S-300 / S-400, they still can't take ground. You need brave soldiers to take ground. American soldiers and Israeli soldiers are far from brave. 1 casualty and their leader loses election. That is the weakness of democratic countries.

I think you're studying master degree in stubbornness in Canada, aren't you @undertakerwwefan

 

[FuturePAF]

Even if they can blow up every S-300 / S-400, they still can't take ground. You need brave soldiers to take ground. American soldiers and Israeli soldiers are far from brave. 1 casualty and their leader loses election. That is the weakness of democratic countries.

Taking ground is counter productive. Subduing the enemy, and achieving your political war aims are more important and long lasting. Land, in the Indo-Pak Context, tends to get traded back after the ceasefire treaty.

At present India wants to impose its regional hegemony and Pakistan wants to dissuade them of doing so. Therefore War is currently not in Pakistan's interest, but rather it is currently advantageous for India to peruse a quick war to cripple Pakistan. Pakistan needs to maintain the ability to make them fail at that objective and hurt them enough to regret such a venture. Knocking out their S-300/S-400 is to prevent Indian Air Superiority over Pakistan. Air Superiority they would hope to use to protect their Cold Start Battle Groups cutting up Pakistan.

So knocking out their C4ISR, Military leadership, Armor and Air Defense Forces, and Economic Infrastructure would be severe enough to prevent them from embarking on another such venture. this is what Pakistan has to be build up to be able to achieve.

 

[Brainsucker]

There is no invincible SAM. Their effectiveness actually around 50% - 80%. So there will always a gap that can be used by the attacker to destroy them. The point is not the battery. It's about the positioning and the advantage between the attacker and defender. With a surprise attack, everyone will be able to penetrate your air defense. Specially when it is inside your enemy's Playground.

So It is not depend on S300 or S400 only. To rule over the battlefield, and surpass the advantage of Israel, Russia must deploy their whole military to target specifically Israel. Otherwise they won't have enough advantage to stand against the Zionist Might.

 

[GumNaam]

With the exception of Turkey, there is no country in that part of the world that can stand up to Israel's airforce. And, most certainly not the Russians with their limited deployed footprint.

The S300 and S400 are not invincible. Israel has had plenty of time to see how the S300 operates through Greece, and I do think they can take it out with the drop of a hat. With its active use in Syria i am sure most of the western countries have worked out how to jam it, and then give it a good kicking.

We can do the same, with our relationship with China. And, while China doesn't have the long range missiles that the Indians may get, that wont stop PAF from understanding how the radar works, and the underlying battlefield management systems work and how to counter them.

Most Russian systems are over-hyped, when it comes to real world performance, they can never match their paper specifications, and that applies to the S300/400 series aswell.

They haven't stopped one yet though, we have only been seeing Russia making a few words here and there, and the other continuing to make use of its tactics.

The bigger question here though is, and of more relevancy, what are the tactics the IAF employs to counter the S300s and the S400s, rather than whether or not Russia can actually respond, because my interest is rather in whether or not the defense system is penetrable, and if so, then how.

THANK YOU! That's what I've been saying all along!