What's new

Israel IS a racist state

So one of those super-edgy 'Pakistan-Israel friendship' fellows made a thread saying 'Israel can't be an apartheid state', posting random pictures of 'humanitarian assistance' by IDF soldiers (allegedly) in the hopeless time waste of an endeavour that'd sink given the fact that IDF crimes would eternally outnumber their 'good deeds'. A long history of massacring children, shooting protestors in the knees because 'deaths are bad PR sometimes', arresting people who 'may commit crimes in the future' and being backed fully by a largely racist society and racist laws. But I digress.

There's no such thing as 'Israeli' nationality in Israel, as re-emphasized by its judiciary in 2013. We already know about the things like the Apartheid Wall, racial colonies ('Jewish settlements' being the popular euphemism for them; they're racial colonies because they're built for Jews-only after expelling non-Jews from their homes) and we know the Israeli state is full of officials, and has been throughout history, who are openly racist and proud. Israel has implemented several discriminatory laws based on race as well. Those segregated schools, segregated housing, roads for usage by Jews and and not non Jews etc are well known and documented. These horrors can't be hidden, and the Zionist owned Western media wasn't the one to spill the beans on all of this to the public but rather Western activists who went there wielding cameras to discover the truth themselves. Some of whom, like the famous Rachel Corrie, were even murdered by the terrorist Israeli IDF (psychopaths ran her over with an armoured vehicle, twice).

Note: Jew not actually being a race is irrelevant here. It's taken as one, its one of the underlying assumptions of the Israeli state and Zionism so the intent ends up making it the same thing anyway. Archbishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa compared Israeli apartheid to South African apartheid and this really tells one a lot about the nature of this state.

Israel is like this because the Zionist movement and its founders were fascistic, racist and thoroughly evil in their worldview. All this messed up racism is part of Israel's official policy for a reason.

So please, all the hipsters advocating 'Pak-Israel ties' (Israel and Pakistan aren't ever going to be allies and Israel dislikes Pakistan having nukes and a strong military) based on the retarded reasoning of 'hey, look at x Arab state which never opposed Israel to begin with, they're 'patching up' with Israel, means we should do as well!'.
what is your problem with israel?
 
Israel is so a racist state that 20% of its population is arab and muslim,who enjoy the same rights as other jews/israelis. They enjoy more rights than minorities in muslim countries.

Credit must be given where it's due.
Well the squatters from certain european countries werent completely able to expel them all
 
Well the squatters from certain european countries werent completely able to expel them all

A Pakistani talking about minority rights. That's a laugh.

How many Christians left alive in Pakistan, about 2? :lol:
 
My problem with Israel has only to do with my status as a human being. Iran, Pakistan, Syria, doesn't matter who I support, Israel is a putrid state built on a putrid ideology with a sick and demented public.
 
How many Christians left alive in Pakistan, about 2? :lol:
5 million more than there were in 1947 percentage wise and number wise

A Pakistani talking about minority rights. That's a laugh.

How many Christians left alive in Pakistan, about 2? :lol:
Pakistani Muslims werent imported from Eastern Europe to populate a land unlike some
 
Apologism for state racism and apartheid. Look man, give it a rest. Moreover, the Israelis have initiated every major conflict the state of Israel (created via aggressive annexation) has been involved in. Either read the facts or put a lid on it.
1948 - Initiated by Arabs after the declaration of Independence of Israel.
1956 - Initiated by Nasser, stealing the Suez Canal, just a few years before he could assume control legally.
1968 - Initiated by Nasser. The Blockade of the Tiran Strait is an act of war.
1973 - Initiated by Egypt and Syria.
 
All wrong. 1948 Israeli terror gangs like Lehi and Hagannah had already initiated 33 massacres before the first Arab 'army' (ragtag militias) approached from abroad. 1967 Israeli carried out blatant acts of aggression in striking the Egyptian airforce while it was grounded (and while Nasser had troops deployed in Yemen, no less). 1967 being initiated by Israel is the entire reason why Gaza and the West Bank are acknowledged by the UN as occupied territories. How can you not know this?

I don't remember the details of the other conflicts too well (although it is important to remember the 1973 War was retaliation for Israeli annexations in 1967), will jog my memory soon enough but Israeli Hasbara on the 1967 War is the most unbelievable seeing as several Israeli military officials admitted it had been a war of aggression and, as I repeat, it's why Gaza and the WB count as annexed territories.

Confessions/admissions:

In an interview published in Le Monde on 28 February 1968, Israeli Chief of Staff Rabin said this: “I do not believe that Nasser wanted war. The two divisions which he sent into Sinai on 14 May would not have been enough to unleash an offensive against Israel. He knew it and we knew it.”

On 14 April 1971, a report in the Israeli newspaper Al-Hamishmar contained the following statement by Mordecai Bentov, a member of the wartime national government. “The entire story of the danger of extermination was invented in every detail and exaggerated a posteriori to justify the annexation of new Arab territory.”

On 4 April 1972, General Haim Bar-Lev, Rabin’s predecessor as chief of staff, was quoted in Ma’ariv as follows: “We were not threatened with genocide on the eve of the Six Days War, and we had never thought of such a possibility.”

In the same Israeli newspaper on the same day, General Ezer Weizmann, Chief of Operations during the war and a nephew of Chaim Weizmann, was quoted as saying: “There was never any danger of annihilation. This hypothesis has never been considered in any serious meeting.”

In the spring of 1972, General Matetiyahu Peled, Chief of Logistical Command during the war and one of 12 members of Israel’s General Staff, addressed a political literary club in Tel Aviv. He said: “The thesis according to which the danger of genocide hung over us in June 1967, and according to which Israel was fighting for her very physical survival, was nothing but a bluff which was born and bred after the war.”

In a radio debate Peled also said: “Israel was never in real danger and there was no evidence that Egypt had any intention of attacking Israel.” He added that “Israeli intelligence knew that Egypt was not prepared for war.”

Hasbara always sucks. Although it has no particular relevance when 'justifying racism'.
 
Last edited:
Irony is that India is the biggest racist state but its most cherished nation by enemies of Pakistan.
 
1948 - Initiated by Arabs after the declaration of Independence of Israel.
1956 - Initiated by Nasser, stealing the Suez Canal, just a few years before he could assume control legally.
1968 - Initiated by Nasser. The Blockade of the Tiran Strait is an act of war.
1973 - Initiated by Egypt and Syria.

Arabs beat Jews thousands of years ago. They come back. They gotta fight for it.

 
For God's sake racist state means state with racist laws. India doesn't have racial segregation etc now does it? No? Then please don't add uninformed contributions. I'm talking about countries with racist laws not just 'racist people'.
 
Back
Top Bottom