Is pathological lying a condition common to all Islamists? Where does it say it's a female only discussion? It's out in the open, in a public place! It was supposed to be an 'open' forum to exalt the virtues of islamist hijab, gone wrong! And how did she refuse to answer the question by saying it was offensive? She only said comparing men with flies is insulting. But she went ahead and explained her point, after being interrupted by the moderator lady.
Please resist the urge to lie! There's value to the truth, even if it goes against your pre-programmed ideology!
certainly people like you have to live in their lies.
Yes, it's in a public place, but the text on the desk says an intimate conversation, either you can't understand Persian (which is not surprising from Zionists) or you are enough biased person to not know that Islamist don't have such a thing as an intimate conversation among men and women.
also maybe you are blind too and can't see that almost everyone in the background is female.
and that's why that man said, maybe it's better that I don't talk and referred her to the rest of women.
the fact that the baboon uploader censored the whole conversion to just that girl's words is the best proof that how dead-brain people like you feel insecure about hearing the other's voice.
@mohsen
Education theory is not ridiculous, but it is a reality.
and we saw the extend of your reality (delusion) in the video which I posted.
There is no Free Animal, but WILD animals. They are wild while they have no education. Why then you asking them to not eat meat at all?
Then there are animal who could be domesticated and who live with humans. They have more ability to learn.
Then come human beings. We are at out best in learning and changing our behaviour according to the education. This is what differentiate us from the other living beings.
sexual desire is the most powerful instinct in us, to the extend it's comparable with our mandatory needs like the need for eating.
you can not suppress it.
from one side you prescribe for men to hold themselves while in the other side you say women should be free! this is the part which you refused to answer in your reply too, and I ask it again:
why just men should hold themselves while the women are called to be free and provoking?!
if women have the right to provoke and insult the men, then it's men's right to provoke and insult the women too, it's the justice which every human being understands.
in the following clip you can see how people react to a man who is harassing a girl, one without hijab, the other with hijab. the huge difference is due to the unconscious justice which I mentioned:
Please note in Western countries the definition of rape is different than Islamic countries.
In West, if wife and girl friend don't wish sex, then even touching them will come under the charge of rape.
While in Muslim countries, 99% cases of rape are not reported. While Islam demands 4 eye witnesses for rape, and women are not able to provide the 4 eye witnesses. And when Muslim girls report it, then life of that girl and her whole family becomes miserable and the poor girl is being blamed even if she had been raped.
Therefore, please make these corrections in these statistics.
It's just an excuse, and that 99% is baseless as usual.
the difference in statistics is because in Islamic culture, a girl doesn't show provoking behavior and never puts herself in a situation that may leads to rape or harassment, while in the west culture, the opposite manner and open relations is advertised.
what you mentioned about 4 witnesses isn't about rape at all, it's about consent sex between man and woman and when a third person wants to report them and disgrace them, in this case he has to bring 4 (credible) witnesses and they all should have explicitly seen the full penetration.
if a woman can prove her case in west, she can do the same in Iran, there is no difference.
Then you presented a Video
I request you to please watch this video carefully. You will see that this girl (without Hijab) is going ONLY through the backward ghetto areas of Manhatten. You will see only the black community or some foreigners in the video who are molesting her.
It is unfortunate, but there is commonly a lack of education among the black population of US who live in the ghettos. There is lot of drugs there and they are far from being educated.
As compared to these ghettos, if you go to the well educated community areas of US, where mostly white Americans are living, then you will not see that the girls are molested, even if they walk at 12 at night.
This part of your comment is racist. no it wasn't just black men and it wasn't just backward ghetto, there plenty of similar videos in the youtube. it has nothing to do with education at all.
if the number of harassment in the uptown section is lower, it's because they have the money to buy what they desire, the modern enslavement of the women.
in fact if you go to uptown sections in Iran, not only women have no higher safety, but maybe even lower.
The Iranian version of the same video:
http://www.aparat.com/v/zWumG
The negative population growth in the West is not due to atheism/nudity, but it is due to the reason that People are insured by the Government that it will take care of them when they will be old. The people are rich and they don't need the assistance of their children to live as old people.
While in poor countries, even if they are also atheists, you will see the Family system intact and desire to have many children so that these children could look after the parents when they are old.
Look at the Romans of the Past. They were at top in nudity, Sodomy with boys, sex with whores, .... but still this never effected their family life and desire to have a lot of children. It was due to the reason that it was the need of their circumstances in order to survive.
Also look at the divorce rate in Kuwait, UAE and Saudia.
In Kuwait, the divorce rate has gone to alarming 60%.
It is due to the reason that women are rich in Kuwait and they don't need the support of men in case of divorce.
While in Pakistan divorce rate is low while Pakistani women are compelled to stay with husbands in order to survive while they have no means to earn money.
In Islamic Iran too, if women get financial independence, then the divorce rate will go high.
@mohsen
Then you wrote: <<you talked about norm, so I ask you why you don't make the full nudity a norm too?! who would oppose that in the west? the answer is the science. nobody can deny the psychological effect. >>
Welcome to the Scandinavian countries where nudity is fully legal.
And welcome to the nude beaches of Europe, where people are not raping the women, but they have learnt to control through education.
And contrary to your claim, science is very much on the side of nudity.
According to science, more we expose our skin to the sun and fresh air, better it is for our skin and for our mood.
On the other hand, Muslim women in Burqah/Hijab have up to 90% Vitamin deficiency. Especially the Muslim women with Hijab are suffering very badly in the Western countries while there is not enough sun, and one needs to expose a lot of skin in direct sun light in order to get enough Vitamin D.
I didn't say negative population growth is due to atheism/nudity, I said due to the collapse of family unite, and with no doubt, the limitless relations between men and women is against it.
that's what I meant the science not some low level discussions like vitamin deficiency, in fact your claim about vitamin deficiency among Muslim women couldn't be more baseless and ridiculous,
between me as man and a woman there is no difference in sun light absorbent.
we both expose the same amount of the skin to the sun.
Sunlight and cancer:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9498892
