ISIS claims to capture Iranian drone.

[500]

A UAV with weight of RQ-170 flying kilometers above the ground crashing is not the same as a primeval Iranian drone flying in low altitude crashing, hence you are only here to troll. Many U.S think tanks already admitted that Iran most probably has spoofed the GPS system of the RQ-170 to land in Iran, but since it was landed in a desert and not a paved way, its landing gear was broken.

Now this Iranian drone that has been captured by IS, we are producing them since the Iran-Iraq war era, so it's not any cutting edge technology, but RQ-170 was one of the most advanced U.S drones and a totally different case, so again, you are here to pay back by trolling.

Anyone who disagree with lame mullah propaganda is a troll. These guys are heavier than RQ-190 and landed after pilot ejection without broking wings. And they had not fly by wire system even.

 

[Serpentine]

View attachment 155341
View attachment 155342

Anyone who disagree with lame mullah propaganda is a troll. These guys are heavier than RQ-190 and landed after pilot ejection without broking wings. And they had not fly by wire system even.

Are you seriously bringing these pictures up to counter my arguments? How are they even comparable? It's almost certain that these planes crash landed while encountering a problem near ground, they had pilots and they didn't fall down from kilometers above ground. At which height did the pilots eject? Any sane human being with least of thinking capabilities knows that an aircraft doesn't survive a crashing like this if it falls down from couple of kilometers above ground.

Here's an F-22 wreckage after its pilot ejected, hitting the ground:

And you are trolling because you have always did it when Iran was somehow related to the subject, and your history very well proves it.

Even U.S military couldn't counter the idea that Iran may have hacked the drone, I don't think your opinion matters much here. As long as you or them can't prove that Iran didn't hack it, your argument is useless.

 

[500]

Are you seriously bringing these pictures up to counter my arguments? How are they even comparable? It's almost certain that these planes crash landed while encountering a problem near ground, they had pilots and they didn't fall down from kilometers above ground. At which height did the pilots eject?

The F-106 ejected at 4.6 km altitude .

I bet the UAV which ISIS caught crashed from about the same altitude.

As u can see its possible to crash from several kms intact.

And you are trolling because you have always did it when Iran was somehow related to the subject, and your history very well proves it.

Can u provide me a single example when I was wrong?

 

[Serpentine]

The F-106 ejected at 4.6 km altitude .

I bet the UAV which ISIS caught crashed from about the same altitude.

As u can see its possible to crash from several kms intact.


Can u provide me a single example when I was wrong?

You do know that RQ-170 flies in a much higher altitudes (12-15 km), to avoid visual detection by humans or other flying objects?? And no human made air craft can stay intact after falling from that height. Still, you couldn't provide a single proof that Iran has not hacked a drone, why don't you do it?
Also, can you provide a link to prove that the pilot ejected at 4.6 km?

About you being wrong, there are numerous examples and since my time is too precious to search for your past posts, I'll bring only one example: remember speculating the size of Iran-made copy of RQ-170 with that stupid perspective theory? Putting 5 or six of them besides each other to prove that it's a smaller version, it was so stupid that you didn't even answer questions of other members who easily countered those stupid pics.


@500

Just found another lie from you.... that you just said in the post above:
Here's the pilot of the F-106 describing the incident.
1. He has ejected at 8,000 feet which equals to 2.4 km.
2. At the time of the crash, there was 6 inches of snow on the ground, which has probably helped a lot to keep the plane intact.

Now please, come along with another stupid propaganda and a lie.

 

[Esc8781]

Uhhhh

 

[500]

You do know that RQ-170 flies in a much higher altitudes (12-15 km), to avoid visual detection by humans or other flying objects??

Whats the difference 4 km crash or 12 km?

Still, you couldn't provide a single proof that Iran has not hacked a drone, why don't you do it?

The burden of proof is on u.

Also, can you provide a link to prove that the pilot ejected at 4.6 km?

Cornfield Bomber - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

About you being wrong, there are numerous examples and since my time is too precious to search for your past posts, I'll bring only one example: remember speculating the size of Iran-made copy of RQ-170 with that stupid perspective theory? Putting 5 or six of them besides each other to prove that it's a smaller version, it was so stupid that you didn't even answer questions of other members who easily countered those stupid pics.

I am still waiting for any normal video. Why so shy if its real?

 

[Serpentine]

Whats the difference 4 km crash or 12 km?

The burden of proof is on u.

Cornfield Bomber - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I am still waiting for any normal video. Why so shy if its real?

It's not 4.6 km, it's 2.4 km, and I provided you the video where the pilot himself describes it, and you deliberately chose to ignore it. This is another case where I proved you wrong, since you asked.

No the proof is not on me, it's on you who are claiming Iran can not have hacked the drone. Even U.S officials haven't been able to counter it.

But here's one, a picture from Iranian forces observing RQ-170 with electro-optical cameras before downing it. I don't see why they should release they details of hacking for people like you who are always in state of denial. What matters is that RQ-170 was downed by Iran and now it's in our hand.

 

[New]

@Serpentine
Watch the video in this link, it is explaining every thing (about why the UAV seems intact)

جام نیوز :: JamNews - گروهک داعش پهپاد آمریکایی را ساقط کرد + ویدیو و تصاویر



PS: @500 , before reinventing more physic laws, I think you need to watch that video too.

 

[500]

It's not 4.6 km, it's 2.4 km, and I provided you the video where the pilot himself describes it, and you deliberately chose to ignore it. This is another case where I proved you wrong, since you asked.

No difference. Its still kilometers not meters as u claimed.

No the proof is not on me, it's on you who are claiming Iran can not have hacked the drone. Even U.S officials haven't been able to counter it.

I just follow occams razor. Thats it.

ISIS drone looks more intact than RQ-190. Thus propability that ISIS hacked the drone is higher than the probability that Iran did it.

What matters is that RQ-170 was downed by Iran

No proof.

and now it's in our hand.

U have F-14 since 1970-es, but still u cant make anything even nearly close to it.

 

[Serpentine]

No difference. Its still kilometers not meters as u claimed.

I never said it was flying 'meters' above ground, again you lied.

just follow occams razor. Thats it.

ISIS drone looks more intact than RQ-190. Thus propability that ISIS hacked the drone is higher than the probability that Iran did it.

That's a stupid comment, as a think tank, it's expected from you to act like one.
All of Iran's drones at this class have parachutes and that's why it was somehow intact, just like the video provided by @New.

No proof.

Doesn't matter, you were the one who countered it and if you don't believe it, well, who cares?

U have F-14 since 1970-es, but still u cant make anything even nearly close to it.

1. We have never tried to reverse engineer F-14
2. The components inside RQ-170 are are things that no other country in the world except U.S possess. So you don't need to worry about that part, we are working on them. Having them is much better than not having them.

Besides, Israel has had F-15 for years, why couldn't you make something even close to it?

 

[500]

I never said it was flying 'meters' above ground, again you lied.

Why u nerve? This is what u wrote:

It's almost certain that these planes crash landed while encountering a problem near ground, they had pilots and they didn't fall down from kilometers above ground.

2.4 km is kilometers, not near the ground. All my fault is that I trusted wikipedia number, but still its kilometers. Also after some 500 meters of falling speed is stabilized and not increasing anymore. So there is no difference if u fall from 5 km or 1 km at all.

That's a stupid comment, as a think tank, it's expected from you to act like one.
All of Iran's drones at this class have parachutes and that's why it was somehow intact, just like the video provided by @New.

So why it suddenly opened a parachute? It only proves hat it was hacked by ISIS.

1. We have never tried to reverse engineer F-14

Because u cant. Thats why u make F-5 with 2 tails instead.

2. The components inside RQ-170 are are things that no other country in the world except U.S possess.

Ditto F-14.

Besides, Israel has had F-15 for years, why couldn't you make something even close to it?

Unlike Iran Israel never makes supa dupa weapon claims.

 

[Serpentine]

Why u nerve? This is what u wrote:

It's almost certain that these planes crash landed while encountering a problem near ground, they had pilots and they didn't fall down from kilometers above ground.

2.4 km is kilometers, not near the ground. All my fault is that I trusted wikipedia number, but still its kilometers. Also after some 500 meters of falling speed is stabilized and not increasing anymore. So there is no difference if u fall from 5 km or 1 km at all.


So why it suddenly opened a parachute? It only proves hat it was hacked by ISIS.


Because u cant. Thats why u make F-5 with 2 tails instead.


Ditto F-14.


Unlike Iran Israel never makes supa dupa weapon claims.

Now that I'm arguing with you, I came to a conclusion, not only ISIS hacked Iranian drone, but also it was Taliban who downed RQ-170. That drone downed by ISIS is an old UAV that we have been using since 80s, so ISIS capable engineers didn't have much trouble 'hacking' it. Taliban on the other hand, did a spectacular job.

 

[500]

Now that I'm arguing with you, I came to a conclusion, not only ISIS hacked Iranian drone, but also it was Taliban who downed RQ-170. That drone downed by ISIS is an old UAV that we have been using since 80s, so ISIS capable engineers didn't have much trouble 'hacking' it. Taliban on the other hand, did a spectacular job.

Well Iran makes lots of silly propaganda. Thats fact for everyone except haman10 I guess.

I dont underestimate Iran. For example when they say they make Kornet ATGM copy I believe them. But when they say they make stealth UAV that cant be taken seriously.

 

[ResurgentIran]

Well Iran makes lots of silly propaganda. Thats fact for everyone except haman10 I guess.

I dont underestimate Iran. For example when they say they make Kornet ATGM copy I believe them. But when they say they make stealth UAV that cant be taken seriously.

Of course you do. Your merkavas fell victims to them in 2006

 

[500]

Of course you do. Your merkavas fell victims to them in 2006

In 2006 it was Russian made Kornets. Merkavas still prevailed then.