kanishka was not an indian he was central asian, he ruled less than 1/4 of bharat area from Peshawar, Pakistan was not part of Bharat but Central Asia
The Mauryans were punjabis from Taxilla not from maghda
Western and Pakistani historians have rejected any Gupta, pala empire ruling pakistan, it only exists in Bharti txtbook
Akbar-Aurangzeb were turkic-mongol in origin Pakistan was not part of Bharat but Central Asia
Final Note: except the 100 year rule of Mauryans Pakistan and Bharat were never united until muslims came, When they came we were part of Central Asia not Bharat
kanishaka was from central asia- accepted
but his capital was purushapura i.e. present day peshawar
his second n illustrious capital was Mathura, famous for mathura school of art during kanishka period. His coins had lord Shiva in it i.e. ""maaishvara" , his descendents inhabited the present day south asia even during gupta period called themselves "kirthar-kushanas" n they accepted gupta's suzerenity.
Maurays were from the foothills of himalays ,presently indo-nepal border...their clan were "moriya" n they were vaishyas as defined in brahmvaivarta purana. Chandragupta went to present day punjab as it was administratively poorly governed to incite a rebellion. there is a story of him meeting alexander also but its historically not authenticated..
akbar- aurangzeb were of mixed central asian origin...correct
but babur came down from afghanistan to conquer n inhabit hindustan-- his autobiography tuzuk-e- baburi mentions it..infact it was a matter of survuval from him as he was expelled from his homeland..by the time of akbar mughals had mad india their homeland ,even by culture n habits. mughal emperor was called emperor of hindustan.
infact to the point that they were hindustanis thay when the army send by shanjahan to capture balkh n badakhshan i.e. their ancestral homeland, they missed india very much n it was difficult for dara to sustain there. , n only because of aurangzeb's reselience that they could be back to india, though much loss to men n material..it is stated in official biography of shahjahan i.e. padshahnamah written by abdul hamid lahori.
hence ur part of being in central asia is factually incorrect.
India has been a melting pot of different races n civilization .U cannot view it in parts according to ur liberty..u've to see in totality..
infact my ancestry may lead me to central asia or west asia or europe or ultimately to africa ... but i'm as indian as anybody could be ...
Last edited: