Is Indian missile program an empty threat? ICBM without teeth

[BHarwana]

Second nuclear test "Shakti 1": May 11, 1998.
Location: Pokhran.
Yield: 10-15 kilotons

You so comments are so premature are not even worth of my attention

Where is the fissile material for this one baby

First nuclear test: May 18, 1974.
Location: Pokhran.
Yield: 2-15 kilotons.
Fissile material used: Plutonium-239.
Method of production: Cirus reactor supplied by Canada and operated with heavy water supplied by the United States.

Second nuclear test "Shakti 1": May 11, 1998.
Location: Pokhran.
Yield: 10-15 kilotons

You so comments are so premature are not even worth of my attention

Provide me the links to fissile materials for these tests and I will blast your BS

Smiling Buddha and Shakti both use reactor grade plutonium

 

[John Reese]

Where is thehtmssile material for this one baby


Provide me the links to fissile materials for these tests and I will blast your BS

Smiling Buddha and Shakti both use reactor grade plutonium

Child its on Internet I don't have time feed a amatuer and teenage troll


http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/india/nuke-stockpile.html

Where is the fissile material for this one baby


Provide me the links to fissile materials for these tests and I will blast your BS

Smiling Buddha and Shakti both use reactor grade plutonium

Source of your BS

 

[BHarwana]

Child its on Internet I don't have time feed a amatuer and teenage troll


http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/india/nuke-stockpile.html

Baby this is a dead link but you must read this page and view your total yield which 0.0% till now
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_weapons_tests_of_India

Baby none of you tests are weapons grade plutonium or HEU

Baby your Akulla subs are not nuclear armed. You can only deliver through a bomber

 

[The SC]

Where is the fissile material for this one baby


Provide me the links to fissile materials for these tests and I will blast your BS

Smiling Buddha and Shakti both use reactor grade plutonium

The first one in 1974 used Plutonium-239, the second one might have used the same.. Anyhow these matters should not be taken lightly.. let's just assume that they have deliverable nuclear warheads, since in military matters it is always better to expect the worst case scenario and prepare to counter it..

 

[BHarwana]

The first one in 1974 used Plutonium-239, the second one might have used the same.. Anyhow these matters should not be taken lightly.. let's just assume that they have deliverable nuclear warheads, since in military matters it is always better to expect the worst case scenario and prepare to counter it..

Agreed about not taking lightly but 239 is not even deliverable by those missile the bomb becomes the size of a truck

 

[Cookie Monster]

child read more

"Gerboise Bleue": First nuclear test: February 13, 1960.
Location: Reggane Proving Grounds, Algeria.
Yield: 60-70 kilotons.
Fissile material used: Plutonium-239.
Method of detonation: Implosion.
Method of production: Reactor.


Hurricane": First nuclear test: October 3, 1952.
Location: Off Trimouille Island, Australia.
Yield: 25 kilotons.
Fissile material used: Plutonium-239.
Method of detonation: Implosion.
Method of production: Reactor.
Foreign Assistance: United States.


First nuclear test: May 18, 1974.
Location: Pokhran.
Yield: 2-15 kilotons.
Fissile material used: Plutonium-239.
Method of production: Cirus reactor supplied by Canada and operated with heavy water supplied by the United States.

Second nuclear test "Shakti 1": May 11, 1998.
Location: Pokhran.
Yield: 10-15 kilotons

Your sore comments are so premature are not even worth of my attention

No need to prove it...no amount of facts can change minds like these. Now u know how Pakistanis feel when ur media/ppl just outright deny/ridicule Pakistan's capabilities(that are backed up by ample proof/evidence).

Also u r the first Indian that I have seen who is admitting to India's use of fissile material from a Canadian supplied reactor(the reason for the formation of NSG). Facts should always be above national pride. Kudos to ur honesty

 

[JOEY TRIBIANI]

Yeah...tell that to your foreign minister...he is crying that we have a nuclear city!!

Lolz we need an excuse to test our Thermonuclear weapons .

 

[RISING SUN]

@waz @Zaki @Manticore @WebMaster I don't have problems even if someone does unethical here against my country I will protest with relevant links, but look into this thread. No proper backing of authoritative links. Only oral speeches and thread posted in Pakistani section instead of Indian defence section or south and Central Asia section. Where are are we heading? This reply is not posted for those who only come for chatting here.

 

[Indika]

@waz @Zaki @Manticore @WebMaster I don't have problems even if someone does unethical here against my country I will protest with relevant links, but look into this thread. No proper backing of authoritative links. Only oral speeches and thread posted in Pakistani section instead of Indian defence section or south and Central Asia section. Where are are we heading? This reply is not posted for those who only come for chatting here.

Child its on Internet I don't have time feed a amatuer and teenage troll


http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/india/nuke-stockpile.html


Source of your BS

Dont spoil the entertainment , why do you even to want to respond? just enjoy.

 

[RISING SUN]

Baby the point is throwing that weapons on Pakistan you cannot do that only keep it your shelters what a stupid nation you have not tested a warhead for those missiles and you are making missiles lol. Where is your nuclear deterrence


This is a real but hurt thread and it will kill your morals with facts.

Post reported for personal attacks. @Zaki @waz @Manticore pls check and do the needful.

 

[John Reese]

Baby the point is throwing that weapons on Pakistan you cannot do that only keep it your shelters what a stupid nation you have not tested a warhead for those missiles and you are making missiles lol. Where is your nuclear deterrence

Are u nuts or all international report states in 1998 report said India has Enough WBU & tritium for 1000 nuclear bombs

Do you know procedure to change U-235 to Pu-239 that science 101

@Horus @HRK is this guy is for real ???

 

[RISING SUN]

@John Reese don't quote trolls, just report and concentrate on productive/informative threads.

 

[BHarwana]

Are nuts or what report in 1998 report said India has Enough WBU for 1000 nuclaer bombs

Do you know procedure to change U-235 to Pu-239 that science 101

@Horus @HRK is this guy is for real ???

Sir with due respect you have the material but please kindly look at what you have tested in nuclear explosions. Iran also has material for the bombs but do they have one?

Take me to the moon with comments but you have not tested a warhead capable of being loaded on these missiles you call ICBM.

You all have reported me I have received two warnings for personal attacks and my public apology for that but you don't have the warheads to put on those missiles so those missiles either have untested nuclear warhead or conventional warheads. So what is the point of having a Ballistic missile that cannot deliver a nuke.

 

[John Reese]

Sir with due respect you have the material but please kindly look at what you have tested in nuclear explosions. Iran also has material for the bombs but do they have one?

Take me to the moon with comments but you have not tested a warhead capable of being loaded on these missiles you call ICBM.

Dear member I clearly mentioned you that all. Indian test are based on plutonium devices

Pu-239 is consider primary material for Nuclear tests
It's created by Uranium-238
Plutonium generally not occur in nature unlike uranium you have to do enrichment from U-235 to 238 then Pu-239

Warhead capable deivice is shakti 1 test in itself created enough energy to create chain reaction for Thermonuclear stage

 

[The SC]

Here are the Indian tests, but miniaturisation is another important step altogether.. So if India was able to miniaturise its nuclear bombs to fit a missile warhead then it has the capability to launch nuclear tipped ballistic missiles..

1. Shakti I – A thermonuclear device yielding 45 kt, but designed for up to 200 kt. (Powerfull to destroy the city like Mumbai).
2. Shakti II – A plutonium implosion design yielding 15 kt and intended as a warhead that could be delivered by bomber or missile. It was an improvement of the device detonated in the 1974 Smiling Buddha (Pokhran-I) test of 1974, developed using simulations on the PARAM supercomputer.
3. Shakti III – An experimental boosted fission design that is used "non-weapon grade"[14] plutonium, but which likely omitted the material required for fusion, yielding 0.3 kt.
4. Shakti IV- A 0.5 kt experimental device.
5. Shakti V – A 0.2 kt experimental device that used uranium-233.

The interesting part is all the tests have been carried out with super computers which have been built by ISRO and DRDO scientists. India had also developed the launching pads for the nuclear weapons in that time. This had helped to develop the missile program led by Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam.

https://www.quora.com/Why-were-nuclear-bombs-tested-by-India-twice-in-1974-and-1998

Number 1. test of a thermonuclear device was contested all over the world's scientific community, that leaves only number 2. as a potential threat but if based _as they say_ on the Smiling Buddha test, then it is still a primitive design!!!

Pokhran-II thermonuclear test, a failure
Several inaccuracies in the claims made by BARC and in the articles published in the press, including The Hindu, on Pokhran-II need to be corrected. We have hard evidence on a purely factual basis, to inform the nation that not only was the yield of the second fusion (H-bomb) stage of the thermonuclear (TN) device tested in May 1998 was not only far below the design prediction made by the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), but that it actually failed.
...

http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/Pokhran-II-thermonuclear-test-a-failure/article13736892.ece