What's new

Is Indian Aggresive Posturing Prelude to a Fourth War with Pakistan

Status
Not open for further replies.
India Says No Military Action Against Pakistan: Report
AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE
Published: 2 Dec 06:13 EST (11:13 GMT)

NEW DELHI - India is not considering taking military action against Pakistan over the attacks in Mumbai, Foreign Minister Pranab Mukherjee said Dec. 2.

"Nobody is talking about military action," Mukherjee told reporters.

His comments followed a meeting earlier of India's security cabinet, the top decision-making body on military and diplomatic affairs, which met in the aftermath of last week's Mumbai attacks that claimed 188 lives.

"What will be done, time will show and you will come to know," Mukherjee said.

Earlier, the minister said India had called on Pakistan to hand over 20 terror suspects, including the founder of the militant group accused of carrying out the carnage in Mumbai.

The government demanded "the arrest and handover of those persons who are settled in Pakistan and are fugitives of Indian law," Mukherjee said.

"We will await the response of Pakistan," he added.

The names come from a list of suspects originally put together by New Delhi after Lashkar-e-Taiba gunmen attacked the Indian parliament in December 2001.

The foreign ministry called in the Pakistani High Commissioner late Dec. 1, and demanded Islamabad take "strong action" against what India has described as "elements" in Pakistan behind the Mumbai assault.

The men sought by New Delhi include Hafeez Saeed, the founder of Lashkar-e-Taiba, a Pakistan-based militant group which has become the focus of investigations into the attacks.

Other prominent names include Maulana Masood Azhar, chief of the Jaish-e-Mohammed rebel group, and Dawood Ibrahim, wanted in India on charges of masterminding serial bombings in Mumbai in 1993 that killed around 300 people.

Ibrahim was designated as a "global terrorist" by the U.S. Treasury Department in 2003. He is believed to be living in the southern Pakistani city of Karachi.

Pakistan has repeatedly ruled out sending any of the men on the list to India and has denied Ibrahim even lives in the country.

India Says No Military Action Against Pakistan: Report - Defense News
 
Pak to defend its territorial integrity: NSC
Updated at: 2230 PST, Tuesday, December 02, 2008

ISLAMABAD: National Security Conference (NSC) ended here after which Foreign Minister Makhdoom Shah Mehmood Qureshi and Information Minister Sherry Rehman jointly announced official statement.

The political leaders attending the NSC strongly condemned the reprehensible terrorist attacks in Mumbai and asked India to exercise restraint while making statements.

Qureshi said that the meeting unanimously adopted the joint statement. He said the people of Pakistan share the grief of the people of India and extend their sympathy to the families of the victims. Foreign Minister expressed steadfast resolve of the Pakistani nation to defend its honour and dignity as well as country’s sovereignty, political independence and territorial integrity.

He said that all political parties and democratic forces firmly supports the government and the armed forces of Pakistan in defending Pakistan’s security interests. Qureshi said that Pakistan abhors to any act of violence perpetuated against innocent people.

Pak to defend its territorial integrity: NSC
 
DISTURBING SIGNALS FROM DELHI

Stratagem to redraw South Asia's map?

Shamsuddin Ahmed

Is India preparing to attack Pakistan? New Delhi is almost totally convinced that the November 26 terrorist attack on Mumbai was carried out by Pakistan-based militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba with assistance from its intelligence agency ISI. India's deputy Home Minister said attackers were all from Pakistan. Newly appointed Home Minister Chidambaram spoke of response to Pakistan with determination and resolve. The ruling Congress party spokesman, anxious to shore up confidence in domestic demands, called for stern and immediate action. "Certainly we are not going to sit back with Pakistan unleashing this terror on India," the International Herald Tribune (IHT) quoted an unnamed senior security official as saying.
The assertion of Pakistani involvement is based on confession by an alleged terror held from one of the spots of attacks, Ajmal Amir Qasab, who is in an Indian military hospital with injury in the leg.

International media reported that Qasab gave inconsistent answers to the interrogators about identity of the attackers saying they were of many nationals.

Indian militants, media

It is said 10 militants caused the massacre. But is it possible for only just ten young men in their early twenties to hold under seize two international hotels and a Jewish centre for long 70 hours without local assistance?
There are homegrown Indian militant groups. It was recently revealed that involvement of RSS-Bajrang Dal and even a Colonel of Indian Army in Malegaon bombing. Maoists attack is frequent causing the main security concern of the Indian government. Explosion in train in Assam on Tuesday, before the dusts settled in Mumbai, left at least three people dead and 30 others badly wounded.

Indian media, known to have perfected the art of projecting Pakistan as the enemy, has launched a virulent campaign to mount pressure on the government. It is widely believed that the media mood is designed to provoke a crisis or even a war - a preemptive strike on Pakistan.

Disturbing signals

And in Islamabad, daily Dawn reported on December 1: "Disturbing signals are emanating from New Delhi." Sensing the gravity of the situation President Asif Ali Zardari has contacted a number of world leaders asking them to use their good offices to make India realise it could be suicidal to indulge in blame game or military action. ISI in a statement has assured the nation that the armed forces are ready for defending the country. Pakistani Prime Minister Gilani has called for an all-party meeting on Tuesday and Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi told BBC on Monday that Indians are comparing the Mumbai incidents with 9/11 terrorist attack in USA that led to the invasion of Afghanistan. "Indians are taking the escalation level up at a very brisk pace," Qureshi said expressing concern at the prospect of a renewed confrontation.

South Asia's redrawn map

What more disquieting is a redrawn map of South Asia showing Pakistan truncated, reduced to an elongated silver of land with the big hulk of India to the east and an enlarged Afghanistan in the west.

The map, wrote Jane Parlez in the IHT on November 23, was first circulated as a theoretical exercise in some US neoconservative circles. It has, no doubt, fueled a belief among Pakistanis, including the armed forces, that what the United States really wants is the breakup of Pakistan, the only Muslim country with nuclear arms.

US collusion

"One of the biggest fears of the Pakistani military planners is the collaboration between India and Afghanistan to destroy Pakistan ... and United States is colluding in this," Jane quoted an unnamed Pakistani strategic planner as saying.

The apprehension is substantiated by facts. Encouraged by US administration, India has recently made huge investments in Afghanistan. These include construction of a road to the Iranian border that will eventually give India access to the Iranian port of Chabahar, circumventing Pakistan. Not only that. India has offered Afghanistan to send troops, including for training of Afghan military.

General David McKeirnan, commander of US forces in Afghanistan faced some challenging questions in Pakistan last month. He met a group of 70 MPs in Islamabad at a dinner hosted by US ambassador. "Why did you Americans come to Afghanistan when it was peaceful before you got there? We understand that you have invited a thousand Indian soldiers to serve in Afghanistan by Christmas," were some of the anxious queries shoot out by the MPs. The answer of the US General was not known.

The people of Pakistan are not convinced that the newly elected President of US Barak Obama could do anything in resolving the Kashmir problem that many across the world rightly believe as the main cause of giving rise of the militants in India and in the region as well. It is indeed discouraging that the US totally ignored the importance of continuous and popular protests in Kashmir against the Indian rule. It is irony that killing of innocent Muslims and Christians in frequent communal violence in India failed to draw attention of the US administration.

In this backdrop US secretary of state Condoleezza Rice is coming to India next week, maybe in a bid to defuse tension heightened by the terrorist attack on Mumbai. Her statements leaning towards New Delhi have given to doubt about the real purpose of her visit.

HOLIDAY > FRONT PAGE
 
i seriously i dont get it ; why dont we understand we are in a state of war with US and India ; OPEN YOUR EYES OMG
 
Armageddon to pounce on South Asia?

M. Shahidul Islam

The long held apprehensions of the subdued few are proving prophetic as one of the 'Great Games' of this century has already begun to enter its final phase in South Asia where about three-fourths of a billion people subsists on a US$1 per day, or less.

The prospect of an impending war between India and Pakistan is looming ever larger and the loyalty of Bangladesh in particular - and China in general - is being torn apart by competing regional and global interests of powers vying desperately for a quick victory in the ongoing global war on terror that the sole superpower, USA, had initiated in 2001 but failed to win.

Recent visit to Dhaka of Senators John McCain and Joe Liberman` was aimed at coaxing our political and military leaders to prepare for such a prospect as a whole new chapter of regional geopolitics is being re-written under the US-India strategic collaborations in which the newly elected US President, Barack Obama, is about to be unwillingly sucked into.

That is the legacy, George-Bush vintage, but the catalyst for a seemingly unavoidable Armageddon in South Asia is the latest terror attacks in Mumbai which has stoked enormous passion for a broader regional and global confrontation that could end up with mushrooming clouds and nuclear dusts whirling across the region.

Many passionate observers think that the machinations that have brought the region to such a pass are worth a James Bond thriller. We, however, are deeply saddened by what happened in Mumbai, despite there being many unanswered questions begging reasonable answers from responsible quarters.

First of all, not acting on actionable intelligence is a failure that remains unforgivable and is indicative of possessing conspiratorial intents. The US intelligence officials claim they had warned India of a possible terror attack from the sea, on target like the Taj hotel. Few intelligence tips in human history are more specific than that.

Secondly, a number of journalists who often attended news briefing in those luxurious Mumbai hotels say the security there was so tight that visitors at times had to open their shoes while their cell phones were taken away and the bags and wallets were searched with minute precision. The hotels were also ringed with many metal detectors and close circuit cameras. That shows the standard of existing security was high and the tip off from the US intelligence should have turned that security index into a hyper sensitive red alert of some sort.

Yet, 10 gunmen managed to enter those hotels with automatic weapons, grenades, booby traps and high explosives to conduct one of the most detestable carnages. This is unbelievable.

Yet, believe we must; failing in which one could be branded either as a cynic at the best, or a terror sympathizer at the worst. One must also read between the lines of what exactly the US intelligence is saying now and what reasonable explanation could plausibly be provided with respect to why so many innocent lives had to be sacrificed in what now seems a preventable carnage?

US media reports claim India received warnings in October from their intelligence sources of a possible terrorist attack "from the sea" on targets in Mumbai. Some unnamed US intelligence officials told ABC television that they had warned their Indian counterparts in mid-October of a potential attack "from the sea against hotels and business centres in Mumbai". One intelligence official even mentioned specific targets, including the Taj Mahal hotel.

Based on those reports and the testimony of one Ajmal Amir Kasab, the lone gunman reportedly captured by Mumbai police, India has linked the planning and execution of the Mumbai attacks to Pakistan- based Lashkar- E- Taiba (LET) and its operational commander known by three different names: Muzammil, Yusuf and Abu Hurerra. The LET was banned by Pakistan government in 2002. Thus was painted the perfect pretext to grill Pakistan.

Latest reports indicate India is planning a retaliatory air strike against the sprawling LET headquarters in Punjab unless Islamabad hands over 20 of India's most wanted fugitives, including LET leaders Hafeez Sayeed, Maulana Masood Azhar, chief of Jaish-e-Mohammad, and Dawood Ibrahim, Mumbai's chief underworld chieftain who had allegedly masterminded an attack on the city in 1993 that killed 250. India's ambassador to Islamabad, Satyabrata Pal, handed over the list on December 2 to senior Pakistani diplomats.

As expected, Pakistan reacted to the Indian demand in the most strident manner. On December 3, President Asif Ali Zardari rejected the Indian demand and refused to hand over the alleged accused.

"If we had proof, we would try them in our courts. We would try them in our land and we would sentence them," Zardari said in a television interview. Zardari also doubted India's claim that the sole surviving gunman, who was captured by Indian security forces, was a Pakistani national. "We have not been given any tangible proof to say that he is definitely a Pakistani. I very much doubt that he's a Pakistani."

As well, Zardari denied Pakistan's involvement in the attacks, saying the terror strikes were executed by "stateless actors" who wanted to hold the entire world hostage.

Following this, New Delhi's outrage was voiced by External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee who said his country has every right to protect its territorial integrity and will take "appropriate action" as it feels necessary to deal with the terror strikes emanating from Pakistan, including launching military action against terror camps inside Pakistan.

Meanwhile, India's military chiefs were exerting strong pressure on the country's political leaders to give permission to attack the LET headquarters, sooner, and, added to the US intelligence tip off was more implicating input from Indian intelligence officials - whose miserable failure to prevent the carnage has already resulted in the resignations of the country's federal home minister and the national security adviser- who now claim that they'd had intercepted calls made from a satellite telephone to Muridke near Lahore (LET headquarters) before the attackers disembarked from the "mother ship" that brought them from Karachi to the Mumbai coast.

Meanwhile, military experts in India say an attack inside Pakistan is justified because the US has been conducting similar attacks inside Pakistan for a long time. That shows, in the final analysis, the conflict this time may be a US match played by India.

While that may seem fair in a time of global madness, experts however believe that, should India decide to launch a US-styled attack inside Pakistan, it will hardly be pre-emptive, given that much of the damage to Indian image as a security hazard nation has already been done. Besides, an Indian strike inside Pakistan will result in Pakistan military's re-deployment from the frontline along the Afghan- Pakistan border to the Pak-India border in the East. This will put into jeopardy the ongoing US war against al-Qaeda and Taliban who too might swoop on India as Pakistan's military ally.

And, in case of further continuation of military operations by India, a nuclear showdown is expected in the region due to Pakistan's established military doctrine to go for a first strike before the predominant conventional forces of India enter deep into Pakistani territory, or, cause massive damage from air, land or sea-launched attacks. An outbreak of war, or even further escalation, will also bury the peace talks that the two nations have diligently pursued since 2004. All these will also turn the region into a hotbed of military conflicts, superseding perhaps the Mid-East.

Worst still is the prospect of Kashmir turning into the focal point once again, much to Delhi's chagrin, in case a full-blown fourth Indo-Pak war breaks out.

The Kashmir dispute involves huge area of 222,000 square kilometers, divided as a result of the Indo-Pak and Indo-China wars and vied by all three powers for its strategic value. That makes the prospect of China being sucked into the fray even greater. That is why this Great Game is too fatal for the region, and, whosoever may be behind these fatal escalations, the end game will be decided by dispensing justice and ameliorating genuine grievances.

Like the ongoing Arab Israeli conflicts in which fighting consecutive wars did not ensure victory to Israel due to the Palestinian issue not being resolved first, the next Indo-Pak war too will leave India with little gain unless the Kashmir cauldron is defused permanently. That is the rule of the game and no military power can change that rule.

HOLIDAY > FRONT PAGE
 
DISTURBING SIGNALS FROM DELHI

Stratagem to redraw South Asia's map?

Shamsuddin Ahmed

Is India preparing to attack Pakistan? New Delhi is almost totally convinced that the November 26 terrorist attack on Mumbai was carried out by Pakistan-based militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba with assistance from its intelligence agency ISI. India's deputy Home Minister said attackers were all from Pakistan. Newly appointed Home Minister Chidambaram spoke of response to Pakistan with determination and resolve. The ruling Congress party spokesman, anxious to shore up confidence in domestic demands, called for stern and immediate action. "Certainly we are not going to sit back with Pakistan unleashing this terror on India," the International Herald Tribune (IHT) quoted an unnamed senior security official as saying.
The assertion of Pakistani involvement is based on confession by an alleged terror held from one of the spots of attacks, Ajmal Amir Qasab, who is in an Indian military hospital with injury in the leg.

International media reported that Qasab gave inconsistent answers to the interrogators about identity of the attackers saying they were of many nationals.

Indian militants, media

It is said 10 militants caused the massacre. But is it possible for only just ten young men in their early twenties to hold under seize two international hotels and a Jewish centre for long 70 hours without local assistance?
There are homegrown Indian militant groups. It was recently revealed that involvement of RSS-Bajrang Dal and even a Colonel of Indian Army in Malegaon bombing. Maoists attack is frequent causing the main security concern of the Indian government. Explosion in train in Assam on Tuesday, before the dusts settled in Mumbai, left at least three people dead and 30 others badly wounded.

Indian media, known to have perfected the art of projecting Pakistan as the enemy, has launched a virulent campaign to mount pressure on the government. It is widely believed that the media mood is designed to provoke a crisis or even a war - a preemptive strike on Pakistan.

Disturbing signals

And in Islamabad, daily Dawn reported on December 1: "Disturbing signals are emanating from New Delhi." Sensing the gravity of the situation President Asif Ali Zardari has contacted a number of world leaders asking them to use their good offices to make India realise it could be suicidal to indulge in blame game or military action. ISI in a statement has assured the nation that the armed forces are ready for defending the country. Pakistani Prime Minister Gilani has called for an all-party meeting on Tuesday and Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi told BBC on Monday that Indians are comparing the Mumbai incidents with 9/11 terrorist attack in USA that led to the invasion of Afghanistan. "Indians are taking the escalation level up at a very brisk pace," Qureshi said expressing concern at the prospect of a renewed confrontation.

South Asia's redrawn map

What more disquieting is a redrawn map of South Asia showing Pakistan truncated, reduced to an elongated silver of land with the big hulk of India to the east and an enlarged Afghanistan in the west.

The map, wrote Jane Parlez in the IHT on November 23, was first circulated as a theoretical exercise in some US neoconservative circles. It has, no doubt, fueled a belief among Pakistanis, including the armed forces, that what the United States really wants is the breakup of Pakistan, the only Muslim country with nuclear arms.

US collusion

"One of the biggest fears of the Pakistani military planners is the collaboration between India and Afghanistan to destroy Pakistan ... and United States is colluding in this," Jane quoted an unnamed Pakistani strategic planner as saying.

The apprehension is substantiated by facts. Encouraged by US administration, India has recently made huge investments in Afghanistan. These include construction of a road to the Iranian border that will eventually give India access to the Iranian port of Chabahar, circumventing Pakistan. Not only that. India has offered Afghanistan to send troops, including for training of Afghan military.

General David McKeirnan, commander of US forces in Afghanistan faced some challenging questions in Pakistan last month. He met a group of 70 MPs in Islamabad at a dinner hosted by US ambassador. "Why did you Americans come to Afghanistan when it was peaceful before you got there? We understand that you have invited a thousand Indian soldiers to serve in Afghanistan by Christmas," were some of the anxious queries shoot out by the MPs. The answer of the US General was not known.

The people of Pakistan are not convinced that the newly elected President of US Barak Obama could do anything in resolving the Kashmir problem that many across the world rightly believe as the main cause of giving rise of the militants in India and in the region as well. It is indeed discouraging that the US totally ignored the importance of continuous and popular protests in Kashmir against the Indian rule. It is irony that killing of innocent Muslims and Christians in frequent communal violence in India failed to draw attention of the US administration.

In this backdrop US secretary of state Condoleezza Rice is coming to India next week, maybe in a bid to defuse tension heightened by the terrorist attack on Mumbai. Her statements leaning towards New Delhi have given to doubt about the real purpose of her visit.

HOLIDAY > FRONT PAGE

Rumors are that India is preparing for a limited and surprise air strike using its Mirage 2000 or British Tornadoes (low level incursion) to bomb the Jamat ud Dawa HQ near Lahore (in Muridke). This would be a strike carried out most likely in the wee hours of the morning under darkness with a time span of 30 minutes in-out.

However, any strike by India no matter how limited in nature it may be inside the borders of Pakistan will be taken as an outright act of war and PAF will launch multiple counter strikes on Delhi and Mumbai leading to most likely a full scale war between the two nuclear neighbors. Needless to say, our nuke threshold is much smaller, so lets hope better sense prevails amongst the Indians not to be foolish to take such a step.
 
Rumors are that India is preparing for a limited and surprise air strike using its Mirage 2000 or British Tornadoes (low level incursion) to bomb the Jamat ud Dawa HQ near Lahore (in Muridke). This would be a strike carried out most likely in the wee hours of the morning under darkness with a time span of 30 minutes in-out.

India dont have Tornado's there please get a life.

However, any strike by India no matter how limited in nature it may be inside the borders of Pakistan will be taken as an outright act of war and PAF will launch multiple counter strikes on Delhi and Mumbai leading to most likely a full scale war between the two nuclear neighbors. Needless to say, our nuke threshold is much smaller, so lets hope better sense prevails amongst the Indians not to be foolish to take such a step.

India bombed Pakistani soldiers/militiants in Kargil. India shot down PN Atlantique which Pakistan claims it was in PAK airspace. What happened then?

Why no one declared act of war? Where was the mighty PAF?
 
India dont have Tornado's there please get a life.



India bombed Pakistani soldiers/militiants in Kargil. India shot down PN Atlantique which Pakistan claims it was in PAK airspace. What happened then?

Why no one declared act of war? Where was the mighty PAF?

India dont have Tonado's WHERE? where did you learn to write UNGLISH? Secondly, India's Tornadoes are indeed to be used for such an event no matter where ever they are based in India. And thanks again I have a life and its quite nice and strong keeping in view your nation's impotent reaction to the Mumbai Mow Down!

Kargil was being fought on Indian Ground and frankly our soldiers had mowed down enough of your poor saps to last them a life time! So the Indian Mirages were practically bombing their own posts!

Atlantique swayed into Indian territory indeed. Shooting it down was though premature but shows Indian designs & towards Pakistan! But worry not, it was sheer luck when your MI-17 carrying bunch of propaganda battalion missed the explosive tip of our Surface to Air Missile!

However, do not confuse yourself with the US in Afghanistan that your Indian troops will land in their Mi-17's in Muridke, shoot around and then disappear while the GoP will launch a strong protest only! We will first shoot down the intruders, then we will launch a counter strike. So PLEASE GO AHEAD AND PUT YOUR MONEY WHERE YOUR MOUTH IS! WE ARE WAITING HONEY!!
 
I hope to God the government we have isn't conned into allowing air strikes, this is my main concern.
 
Hoax call fuels Pakistan-Indian tensions



By MUNIR AHMED, Associated Press Writer Munir Ahmed, Associated Press Writer – 41 mins ago


ISLAMABAD, Pakistan – A man pretending to be India's foreign minister called Pakistan's president and talked in a "threatening" manner during the Mumbai terror attacks, prompting Pakistan to put its air force on high alert, a security official and a news report said Saturday.

Dawn newspaper said authorities were investigating the circumstances of the hoax, which occurred as tensions spiked between the nuclear-armed neighbors during the attacks.

The atrocity, which began Nov. 26, is being blamed by India on Pakistani extremists.

Indian officials were not immediately available to comment on the telephone call.

The call by a man identifying himself as Indian Foreign Minister Pranab Mukherjee was put through to President Asif Ali Zardari on Nov. 28, said the security official, who declined to be identified, citing the sensitivity of the issue.

"India through diplomatic channels has informed the Pakistani Foreign Ministry that Pranab Mukherjee made no such call," he said. "Now what still needs to be checked is who made this threatening call."

Dawn newspaper said the country's air force was put on high alert in response to the telephone call. It said it came from a New Delhi number, but that Indian officials believed the caller ID could have been manipulated.

A day after the call, two Pakistani security officials warned the government would pull its troops from the anti-terrorism fight along the border with Afghanistan in order to respond to any Indian military mobilization.

During a briefing, one of those officials said someone from the Indian Foreign Ministry had called "a top Pakistani personality" and threatened military action if Pakistan did not cooperate with New Delhi.

The rising tensions between the two rivals prompted an intense round of international telephone diplomacy that night and into the next day. U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice spoke to Zardari and Mukherjee.

Dawn reported that Rice asked Mukherjee why he took such a threatening tone with Zardari. He replied he had had no contact with the president, the newspaper reported, in what apparently led to the hoax being uncovered.

Dawn reported that none of the normal checks on establishing callers' identities before putting them through to the president were carried out because of the urgency of the situation during the attacks.

Pakistan and India have fought three wars in 60 years, two over the disputed territory of Kashmir. Despite improved relations since 2004, mistrust on both sides remains high.

Indian authorities say the Mumbai attackers were members of a banned Pakistani militant group that was set up by Pakistani intelligence officials to battle Indian rule in Kashmir.

Pakistan says it has yet to see any proof of New Delhi's allegations but is prepared to cooperate with India. It has denied any of its state agencies were involved in the attacks, noting it too is a victim of terrorism.

In the latest attack, a car bombing Friday in the northwestern city of Peshawar killed 29 people and wounded 100 more. The blast wrecked a Shiite Muslim mosque and a hotel, but the motive and culprits were not immediately known.

Further adding to the tension in Pakistan, a suspected U.S. missile strike reportedly killed three people in a stronghold of the Taliban and al-Qaida near the border with Afghanistan, intelligence officials said.

There have been more than 30 suspected U.S. missile strikes since August, including the one Friday in the North Waziristan region, part of Pakistan's wild tribal belt viewed as possible hiding place for al-Qaida chief Osama bin Laden.

The missiles are apparently fired from drone aircraft that take off from Afghanistan. U.S. officials rarely confirm or deny responsibility, although American leaders have said the attacks have killed several militant leaders this year.


INDEED! Indians are now having cold feet! What a bunch of pussies!
 
INDEED! Indians are now having cold feet! What a bunch of pussies!

Let the drones do their job. They are enough for you for now.

Shows exactly who is more deserving of the adjective! All you are reduced to is to claim that they are killing your people with some sort of understanding!

Good show. We will also come to some such understanding while taking out the terror camps. After all, why should the innocent Pakistanis suffer in this bargain.
 
Let the drones do their job. They are enough for you for now.Shows exactly who is more deserving of the adjective! All you are reduced to is to claim that they are killing your people with some sort of understanding!

Good show. We will also come to some such understanding while taking out the terror camps. After all, why should the innocent Pakistanis suffer in this bargain.



you dont even need drones...just 15 teenagers are enough for your financial capital..:sniper::sniper:
 
Let the drones do their job. They are enough for you for now.

Shows exactly who is more deserving of the adjective! All you are reduced to is to claim that they are killing your people with some sort of understanding!

Good show. We will also come to some such understanding while taking out the terror camps. After all, why should the innocent Pakistanis suffer in this bargain.

Typical Indian response. Nonsense coupled with irrelevance!

Thank you again for proving to be deserving of the adjective that I used for your nation.
 
you dont even need drones...just 15 teenagers are enough for your financial capital..:sniper::sniper:

15 determined teenagers after the Mumbai Mow Down is too a large number! :rofl:

next time maybe they will just use 5 to bring Delhi to its knees! Like they did to the Indian Parliament! :woot:
 
15 determined teenagers after the Mumbai Mow Down is too a large number! :rofl:

next time maybe they will just use 5 to bring Delhi to its knees! Like they did to the Indian Parliament! :woot:


all i can say is "well said" sir..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom