Arash1991
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2020
- Messages
- 172
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Ive read some Think tank analysis about exactly this. Its about "how to deal with Iran from the distance when it comes to war". The analysis is little bit outdated because since then, Iranian accurate Missile range increased. The solution was in my eyes not very practical but better than nothing. It was to keep distance in the northern Indian Ocean and gain air supriority in the Hormuz Region from there. And after this happens a invasion in Hormuzgan province would be the plan. In my eyes very risky thing.(...)The only way to change your tactic against Iran, is to keep your forces out of our missile range, and make them ineffective in the war. but then again, for a country which is thousands of kilometers away and likes to count on extensive support during it's invasions (like months of piling the equipment in your previous wars) that's impossible, even during Vietnam war where you were still able to create support point for forces, US experienced a humiliating defeat. simply you are not a man of war.
The other fact is that they did not give Irans Air defence a high value in this paper. But this also changed.
One thing that makes really headache in the future will be the development of effective laser weapons. I think laser Weapons are the only solution against Irans Ballistic missiles.
Anoither point is that US strongly invested specially in the Persian Gulf region in Air defence Systems against missiles. Lot of weapon deals with Arabian States on the Persian Gulf are related to missile defence. Although I dont think that this will be the solution, on the other hand I dont think that they are absolutely useless.