What's new

Iraq's war against IS terrorism | Updates and Discussions

ISIL opens 1st consulate in Turkish capital

The ISIL Takfiri terrorists have purportedly opened a consulate in Turkey and use it to issue visas for those who want to join the fight against the Syrian and Iraqi governments.


The Turkish daily Aydinlik said in a recent report that the consulate was founded in the Cankaya district of the capital Ankara.

The militants are said to be operating freely inside the country without much problem.

Other reports said the members of the Takfiri group have rented luxurious houses in the upscale neighborhood of the capital and Istanbul and use them for residence or as offices.

The terrorists are said to be using minibuses with black windows to get around the city.

The ISIL Takfiri terrorists currently control parts of Syria and Iraq. They have threatened all communities, including Shias, Sunnis, Kurds, Christians, Izadi Kurds and others, as they continue their atrocities in Iraq.

Senior Iraqi officials have blamed Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and some Persian Gulf Arab states for the growing terrorism in their country.

The terrorist group has links with Saudi intelligence and is believed to be indirectly supported by the Israeli regime.

The United States started conducting airstrikes on the ISIL only after US interests were threatened by the militants.

PressTV - ISIL opens 1st consulate in Turkish capital
 
09c9ee57cd076918ccc7302364a299bd.jpg

October:02:2014

“It’s Not the Same!”

Writing at Al-Monitor, Bader al-Rashed, a Saudi commentator, points out how the government of Saudi Arabia seems to be trying to draw a line between the dominant interpretation of Islam in Saudi Arabia (frequently called “Wahhabism”) and the beliefs and actions of ISIS. There are efforts being made to identify ISIS as Kharajites, referring to the 7th C. group that supported a philosophy at odds with both Sunni and Shi’a interpretations of Islam and Islamic rule and was noted for its harsh implementation of takfirism.

This is all well and good, al-Rashed writes, but is complicated by the fact that ISIS is busy handing out books written by Mohammad ibn Abdul Wahhab, whose writing are at the core of Saudi religious belief and practice. Oops.

Over the past 10 years or so, the Saudi government has tried to back away from the most severe interpretations of Islam that it had largely acquiesced to following the 1979 seizure of the Grand Mosque in Mecca. It has managed to do so, to some extent. The government, though, has not been able to ‘convert’ all Saudis to a regime of tolerance. This is proved by its now having to arrest and imprison domestic extremists.

How Saudi Arabia is distancing itself from the Islamic State
Bader al-Rashed

Thirteen years after US President George W. Bush declared war on terrorism, the Middle East is no closer to victory. Instead, terrorism appears to have morphed into an even more dangerous beast in the form of the Islamic State (IS). Westerners, as expressed through the media, seem to be under the same impression as they were after Sept. 11, 2001 — namely, that the Sunni jihadist movement is linked to the Wahhabi brand of Islam emanating from Saudi Arabia. This has prompted renewed debate among Saudis about this supposed Wahhabist-jihadist connection.

After bombings in Riyadh by al-Qaeda in 2003, the relationship between terrorism and religious extremism was widely discussed in the kingdom, with the government establishing the King Abdulaziz Center for National Dialogue that same year. During the dialogue’s second meeting, Extremism and Moderation … A Comprehensive Methodological Vision, it was agreed that religious programs in Saudi Arabia were the primary force behind the spread of extremism in society. As a result of the dialogue, school curricula, the religious curriculum in particular, were modified by the Ministry of Education. Doubts remained, however, that religious education had been sufficiently modified given that radical Islamists were believed to dominate the education sector in the kingdom.

Saudi Arabia is today taking seriously the allegations in the international media that it is the ideological root of the current jihadist groups. Some have sought to defend the country’s religious vision by trying to disassociate Sunni jihadist groups from their brand of Islam, instead castigating other groups, such as the Kharijites — an Islamic sect separate from Sunnis and Shiites that emerged from the first Islamic civil war in the seventh century between Ali Ibn Ali Talib and Muawiya Ibn Abi Sufyan following the killing of the third caliph, Uthman Ibn ...
 
Islamist insurgents seize western Iraqi town of Hit - security sources
Source: Reuters - Thu, 2 Oct 2014 12:43 GMT

BAGHDAD, Oct 2 (Reuters) - Islamic State-led insurgents took control of most of the western Iraqi town of Hit in Anbar province early on Thursday, security sources and local officials said.

The ultra-radical Sunni Muslim militants have captured vast swathes of western and northern Iraq including the north's biggest city Mosul in June, as well as large areas of the east and north of neighbouring Syria.

The fall of Hit exposes the Ain al-Asad military base in the nearby town of al-Baghdadi to attack. Iraqi government forces suffered big losses after insurgents laid siege to other military camps in recent months.

"Ninety percent of Hit has been overrun by militants," said Adnan al-Fahdawi, an Anbar provincial council member, adding that the attackers were better armed than local security forces.

An eyewitness speaking from Hit told Reuters: "Scores of militants can be seen in the town with their vehicles and weapons, I can hear shooting now everywhere."

Other eyewitnesses said the insurgents raised jihadi black flags over government buildings in Hit, and that they had seen corpses of members of the security forces in the streets.

Hit is a walled market town located some 130 km (80 miles) west of the Iraqi capital Baghdad and 30 km (18 miles) from the Anbar provincial capital Ramadi, which is largely under Islamic State control.

The security sources said they believed the attackers were Islamic State fighters, who struck first with three suicide car bombs at the eastern entrance to Hit and a police station in the town. Initial reports from Hit hospital sources said six people, including one civilian, were killed and 12 people wounded.

State television al-Iraqiya said Islamic State insurgents had occupied the mayor's office and police station and that there were heavy clashes going on between the militants and the local Sunni Albu Nimr tribe.

Deputy provincial council chief Faleh al-Issawy called on state television for the Iraqi army, which has proved little threat to IS so far, to support police forces and tribes in Hit.

Soldiers, police and local Sunni Muslim fighters were trying to stem the militant advances, the security sources said.

Most of the surrounding towns in Anbar previously fell under Islamic State control.

In Ramadi, three soldiers were killed and four wounded in a car bomb blast near the headquarters of the Iraqi army's eighth brigade, a security source said.

Six militants were also killed by an Iraqi army helicopter strike in the insurgent-controlled Tamim district of Ramadi on Thursday, another security source said.

(Reporting by Raheem Salman and Saif Sameer Hameed; Writing by Yara Bayoumy and Isabel Coles, editing by Mark Heinrich)

Islamist insurgents seize western Iraqi town of Hit - security sources
 
YPG-PKK in Rabia border crossing with captured equipment from IS.

 
ISIL rooted in US-Israeli intelligence

By Gordon Duff

As President Rouhani of Iran addressed the UN a week ago, the world had changed.

US President Obama had opened a door, one ignored by activists and the armies of professional naysayers of the propaganda organs.

The current situation, pure and unadulterated chaos, has created threats and opportunities, a time for leaders to lead, thinkers to think and the stupid to go home and run their heads into the wall.

If ISIL is an enemy, one Veterans Today asserts has its roots in US, Israeli and Saudi intelligence, a message reflected by President Rouhani, what America says now, what it suggests, has to be tempered by the inescapable reality that ISIL/ISIS is a chimera or as this author has described it, a “witches brew.” Constructive engagement with ISIL/ISIS seems, thus far, to be impossible. What we must also confess is that there is little quality intelligence about them.

I met with Sunni leaders in Iraq in January, discussing the threats posed, postulating what I expected, which has come to pass with uncanny accuracy.

There is a reality of ISIL/ISIS that surpasses its roots, Saudi and Qatar cash, Turkish misdeeds, Israeli plots and American right wing extremism.

Similarly, those in Iraq who, in January 2014, sought to both use and control ISIL/ISIS as leverage against what they perceived as an unbalanced Shiite controlled Baghdad regime, are key to understanding what is happening now.

If there is a massive upsurge in power in ISIL/ISIS, it is from Iraq, the disaffected Sunni’s the Baathists, the old Republican Guard, top quality military “thrown to the wind” out of Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld blindness and insanity.

ISIL/ISIS needs to be addressed but there is a nasty reality recent history has taught us.

They are unlikely to listen until leverage is applied. Toward that end, the US has been remiss in use of air power, the “shock and awe” that has killed so many, so many innocents certainly, on behalf of causes any sane person recognizes as pure evil.

Can America murder for good as well?

With ISIL/ISIS at war against civilian populations, the Kurds of Syria and Iraq in particular, whether you believe press reports or not and “not” is always best, they have set the rules.

Until the US moves toward, initially, 500 sorties per day, moving toward 1,500, with FAC (forward air controller) teams and coverage by 200 plus drones “on station 24/7,” there will be no engagement.
ISIS/ISIL is, by far, not the only “wrong” in the region.

Current behavior by primarily Israel and Turkey requires a strong investigation that may well lead to sanctions against both of them.

Neither have the leverage they once had nor are their locations of the strategic importance they once were.
The Cold War, those there are signs it may be reemerging, will go on without them without Egypt, just fine.
There has to be a nation by nation reassessment, starting with Libya.

Libya has to be secured, initially under the authority of the UN Security Council but including all active players in the region.

By that I mean that regional security should include Russia, always a popular and controversial assertion, but Iran and Syria as well.

Excluding key players is insane.

What has happened in Libya is being ignored by the press and is an embarrassing inconvenience for too many.

Both the UAE and Saudi Arabia had massive air forces and much at risk.

A political solution in Libya, with partial Egyptian sponsorship and taking into account that several powerful corporations and banking groups have been “stirring the pot” in Libya will have to be addressed, perhaps with “prejudice.”

The Assad government in Syria has to be secured but under altered circumstances.
What legitimate opposition existed has been pushed aside by the flashy terror groups mysteriously drowning in cash and the promise of the Islamic version of “sex, drugs and rock and roll,” the non-public selling point for ISIS/ISIL.

As with Boko Haram, ISIS/ISIL takes brilliant advantage of religious dogma and conservatism, crafting its appeal based on promise of “temporary marriage.”

With generations of young men with little hope of a healthy married family life, the alternative of sexual misadventure under the cloak of loosely interpreted scriptural “voodoo” may well empty half of Europe’s Islamic population.

Syria is now the strategic lynch pin for American power in the Middle East, a nation the US has worked to destroy, a nation closely aligned with Putin’s Russia.

Nevertheless, stabilizing the Assad government, enabling realistic and sweeping reforms long needed and re-conquering territory under “unreliable” governance is vital.

Toward that end, US policy has to continue to “turn” toward reality, totally abandoning any idea of recruiting “anti-Jihadist Jihadists.”

As Dr. Franklin Lamb pointed out recently in an article in Veterans Today, any US recruit is likely to take his training and weapon and join ISIL at any point and, in fact, almost the entirety of ISIL/ISIS cadres were US trained.

Without the ability to fly over Syria from US carriers or even operate combat aircraft from Syrian bases, the US is greatly hampered in air operations.

There are only two armies in the Middle East, within practical reach of tactical aircraft that can be trusted to secure bases for air operations against ISIS/ISIL.

One is Syria. The other is Iran.

Iran is developing its own aerospace industry but should well have been offered the F 16C from the US in numbers simply out of American self-interest.

Iran has developed a massive self-defense force, a powerful missile capability and a strong and capable military leadership and has done so within purely defensive guidelines.

What this has created, something recognized by the US as early as 1953, when the CIA choose to turn Iran into a US colony, is a requirement in the Middle East for Iran to have a strong stabilizing role.

This requires a quick settlement of nuclear issues and a recognition on behalf of those of moderate sanity that the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) has, since around 2003, been dominated by Israeli intelligence.

The Agency’s work is vital and, as long as we allow it to go on as it does today, staffed with spies and half-trained amateurs, we are not going to be able to move forward.

The old staff of the IAEA and supporting groups are still around, top nuclear weapons designers, who are capable of guaranteeing Iranian compliance and who, if pushed hard enough, will agree to “look the other way” over Israel’s flagrant violations of nuclear non-proliferation issues and the threat they pose to world security.

Conclusion

I see no solution at this time other than the US relocating at least two air wings and 5 aircraft carriers for operations against ISIS/ISIL along with at least 500 drones. The result of these actions will lead to the deaths of hundreds of civilians.

In each case, Libya, Syria and Iraq, efforts to redress the needs and desires of those who chose ISIL/ISIS must be recognized.

As President Goodluck Jonathan had recently pointed out in regard to Boko Haram, “these are our children we will be killing.”

What is recognized, however, is that a war is afoot, blame can be shared widely, but along with “shock and awe,” there must also be redress of grievances.

Relations with Iran have to be normalized and Iran has to be convinced to assume a stabilizing role within her position as leader of the Non-Aligned Movement.

The covert war on Iran has made all of this possible to the extent that the hand of America’s extremist neocon-Zionists is more than visible here, the Ukraine, across Africa and elsewhere.

You will find them in Libya as well, behind the scenes at every turn.

It is for President Obama, Secretaries Kerry and Hagel and General Dempsey to stand against the McCain, Romney, Cruz, Netanyahu, Rothschild cabal and stop what anyone can clearly see, the embers of a world war fanning into very real flames.

PressTV - ISIL rooted in US-Israeli intelligence
 
Some sheikhs of the tribes in Iraq or Syria who are with ISIS, the Lions of Anbar selling their asses to everyone who comes along, be it Americans in 2004, Safavid Iraqis and today ISIS.

bdc3576c3b96e7b1f3aab529d5fdcbc4.jpg

ee2879376162f9db1d0e250d3f27e256.jpg

135b995c393409959ff8922ebe26e63a.jpg

0a50b790190c82b927ec26c802f2f70a.jpg

64735bdfc5832ffb71470faf91adbc9c.jpg



@BLACKEAGLE if you don't mind let me tag you to inform you about the lions of Anbar. As we spoke earlier about the tribal people of the region, Iraq/Syria and possibly the related ones nearby. I told you they bow to everyone who comes along, Americans in 2004, Safavids after and ISIS now to avoid their blood being shed for their supposed values which they don't seem to have.
 
Last edited:
I am half iranian and in the past I was a big supporter of Irans foreign policy and even supported the criminal child murder called assad. But now when we look at Iraq and Syria we can see Irans real face. Iran is pretending to be so islamic but is fighting and killing the muslims all over the world while spreading shiism into sunni lands. Iran is by far the biggest enemy of Islam by now and even more dangerous to Islam than the Zionists.
 
Officials: Islamic State group downs Iraqi chopper

Oct. 3, 2014 12:10 PM EDT
BAGHDAD (AP) — Officials in Iraq say an Iraqi military attack helicopter has been shot down by Islamic State group militants in the country's north.

An official with the Iraqi Defense Ministry says the Mi-35 helicopter was brought down Friday by a rocket launcher between the towns of Beiji and al-Senniyah in northern Iraq.

An official with the Iraqi air force corroborated the information, saying the helicopter's pilot and co-pilot were killed.

Beiji, located 200 kilometers (130 miles) north of Baghdad, is home to Iraq's biggest oil refinery.

Both officials spoke anonymously as they are not authorized to speak with journalists.

Officials: Islamic State group downs Iraqi chopper

 
Shia is majority in Iraq, some 60 to 70 percent of the population, even higher in the Baghdad area. Surprising the IS is doing so well against Sadr's Mahdi Army near Baghdad :o:
What really funny they the mahdi army still awaiting an order from the sadr.

but there are other shea groups who defeated daesh every
times even daesh avoidig them you will never get a news about daesh defeating any shea militia but they could defeated the army easily!! the reason for that is that the iraqi army lead by baathist who for no doubt send daesh critical info about the army believe it or not and daesh no way can attack baghdad while these men defending it.

our problem is that our clerics holding the shea from fighting. they just afraid of a sectarian war believe it or not that's our main problem these daesh and baathist know that. that why you see them fight bravely because they know we been hold by our clerics.
 
I am half iranian and in the past I was a big supporter of Irans foreign policy and even supported the criminal child murder called assad. But now when we look at Iraq and Syria we can see Irans real face. Iran is pretending to be so islamic but is fighting and killing the muslims all over the world while spreading shiism into sunni lands. Iran is by far the biggest enemy of Islam by now and even more dangerous to Islam than the Zionists.
good point of internet is that people can pretend to be someone they are not
your story you supported crimes and not now, say that to low iq people guy
and the stuff with zionism comparison stuff with iran it looks much more salafi
get a life , and stop to lie
 
Many vehicles captured from IS that they captured from IA, now in the hands of Peshmerga after the liberation of Rabia.


829802b43fccc91e7b4b65a3e0943cc6.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom