What's new

Iraq's war against IS terrorism | Updates and Discussions

Says the guy who can't come up with a better explanation for the shameful poster that transcend on Iraq's sovereignty (if it exists anyway)

@IR-TR Why are you pissed anyway; you should be happy. You own Iraq.

Just put their oil to good use, like develop more infrastructure and tourist attractions in northern Iran, I would love to visit you sometime.

Good job, you played it right, seriously. :tup:

Don't be a child. Okay. By that logic, Saudi Arabia owns all Sunni countries (giving them money). So when Iran helps Iraq in defeating it's arch enemy, they own them? I know, Erwin Rommel, Iran should have just waited for ISIS to reach it's borders. Only THEN would ISIS become a danger. What was Iran thinking?
 
Don't be a child. Okay. By that logic, Saudi Arabia owns all Sunni countries (giving them money). So when Iran helps Iraq in defeating it's arch enemy, they own them? I know, Erwin Rommel, Iran should have just waited for ISIS to reach it's borders. Only THEN would ISIS become a danger. What was Iran thinking?
it's about a huge poster of a foreign leader hanged in a public space in the capital of a sovereign country, and under it are statements of loyalty and total allegiance to that foreign leader.

It's not about the money, "child."
 
it's about a huge poster of a foreign leader hanged in a public space in the capital of a sovereign country, and under it are statements of loyalty and total allegiance to that foreign leader.

It's not about the money, "child."

These things happen. Just the same, tomorrow an Iraqi will paint over it. Iran happens to be the biggest helper of Iraq against ISIS. So out of 35 million people, somebody hangs up a poster. Big deal. As if PM Abadi personally went there and put up that poster. Listen, it's specious. Just as specious as Erdogan being greeted in Albania by huge Turkish flags. He hasn't annexed Albania. Or People in Europe or elsewhere putting up huge Obama posters and paintings in 2008-2011. It's just friendly. I dislike the Baghdad poster, but Iran doesn't own Iraq, and even if it did, a silly poster proves nothing. Next topic, we're getting OT.
 
IRAQ Under Saddam Hussain

yt0.jpg
 
IRAQ Under Saddam Hussain

View attachment 229872

then_and_now_afghanistans_and_iran-164395.jpg


Saddam did nothing wrong. He keep the rats where they belong in the ground and sewers away from normal hard working peace loving multi-ethnic arabs.

remove Saddam the flood gates open. this will also happen in Libya and Syria.
 
then_and_now_afghanistans_and_iran-164395.jpg


Saddam did nothing wrong. He keep the rats where they belong in the ground and sewers away from normal hard working peace loving multi-ethnic arabs.

remove Saddam the flood gates open. this will also happen in Libya and Syria.
You are wrong since you don't know anything about the region

It was the saddam the hole hero who supported the muslim brotherhood terrorists in Syria

It was him who supported the salafi wahhabi movement in campaign called the faith campaign

He supported the sunni Islamists but at the same time he opressed the shia Islamists

Many Baathists were more sectarian than secular nationalists that's why after 2003 all the insurgent groups were former Baathists and republican gaurd

Every one knows that the sectarianism was exit since the foundation of modern Iraq and its got bigger when the Baathists came to power in 1960s

And how great was Iran under Khomani given the fact that khomeni was leading a so called Islamic government and Saddam was a secularist/

The majority of them were communists and MEK marxist terrorists
Don't tell me isis supporter like you love communists

IRAQ Under Saddam Hussain

View attachment 229872
The Baathists will never rule iraq again
 
You are wrong since you don't know anything about the region

It was the saddam the hole hero who supported the muslim brotherhood terrorists in Syria

It was him who supported the salafi wahhabi movement in campaign called the faith campaign

He supported the sunni Islamists but at the same time he opressed the shia Islamists

Many Baathists were more sectarian than secular nationalists that's why after 2003 all the insurgent groups were former Baathists and republican gaurd

Every one knows that the sectarianism was exit since the foundation of modern Iraq and its got bigger when the Baathists came to power in 1960s


The majority of them were communists and MEK marxist terrorists
Don't tell me isis supporter like you love communists


The Baathists will never rule iraq again


Saddam was the cork to Champagne but in this case the Champagne was some nasty rat urine.
the U.S unleashed madness
72b35ec28467fcbccaa4cdc1e5f679c6.jpg


mou4ljhzwg1x8k7.jpg
 
Saddam was the cork to Champagne but in this case the Champagne was some nasty rat urine.

mou4ljhzwg1x8k7.jpg
You didn't get the point he and his followers who started sectarianism when they banned ashura in 1977 and bombed imam Hussein shrine 1991
 
You didn't get the point he and his followers who started sectarianism when they banned ashura in 1977 and bombed imam Hussein shrine 1991


so saddam is worse than ISIS. not saying the man was a Saint, but people need a tough leader.
 
Don't u have a narration that says that hazrat ali (ra) was sent to level the graves by the prophet SAW.
So if saddam levelled a grave it must be soothing to the eyes of the shia for he is doing what hazrat ali (ra) did on the orders of the prophet saw.

As regards to banning ashura , u must be thankful to him to remind and make u adhere to the teachings of the Quran that says
and definitely Allah is with the patient ones (sabiroon).



If we apply the same logic then are the IS people justified in exterminating the Shias for Shias are no better than communists to them?
Well you are stupid takfiri so its useless to talking to you
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom