What's new

Iraqi soldiers, police drop weapons, flee posts in portions of Mosul

An Iraqi Exile Who Misled The US And Fed Information To Iran Is Making A Comeback
JUN. 19, 2014 by ARMIN ROSEN


rtr2a8gs.jpg

Ahmed Chalabi, head of the Iraqi National Congress, speaks at a news conference in Baghdad on February 14, 2010.


A familiar and controversial name is reappearing in official American discussions of Iraq's political future.
The New York Times is reporting that Ahmed Chalabi, the former leader of the exile Iraqi National Congress (INC), has met with the U.S. ambassador in Baghdad and the senior state department official responsible for Iraq and Iran policy in recent days.

Chalabi, who has remained active in Iraqi politics, is viewed as "one of the several potential Shiite candidates for prime minister."

By some accounts, Chalabi, a secular Shi'ite from one of the most prominent Iraqi families of the pre-Saddam Hussein period, is a central figure in the U.S.'s decision to remove the Iraqi dictator over a decade ago. An MIT and University of Chicago-trained mathematics PhD, Chalabi spent decades cultivating contacts in the U.S. government during a long and occasionally tumultuous career as a banker and academic. As Jane Meyer recounted in a 2004 New Yorker profile of Chalabi, he had the almost single-minded goal of convincing the U.S. to unseat Saddam Hussein from power.

His advocacy paid off: Chalabi helped get the Iraq Liberation Act passed through Congress in 1998, a law that made regime change in Baghdad an official U.S. policy. Chalabi's claims that Saddam was an imminent threat to the U.S., and was both holding and developing a stockpile of weapons of mass destruction, became the view of the intelligence community and eventually the majority of the U.S. congress. In the first four years of the Bush administration, Chalabi's INC recieved $39 million from the U.S. government.

Meyer explains that in the decade leading up to the invasion, Chalabi became a highly-valued point-person for U.S. policy. He fed information to the U.S. government on Saddam's regime and the country's potential political landscape if he were ever overthrown. In exchange, Chalabi got exactly what he wanted, even if it might have meant misleading U.S. officials, or at least manipulating the policymaking process to suit his ends. Meyer's profile includes an illuminating quote from American diplomat Peter Galbraith, a one-time friend of Chalabi's:

As Galbraith put it, Chalabi “figured out in the eighties that the road to Baghdad ran through Washington. He cultivated whom he needed to know. If he didn’t get what he wanted from State, he went to Capitol Hill. It’s a sign of being effective. It’s not his fault that his strategy succeeded. It’s not his fault that the Bush Administration believed everything he said. Should they have? Of course not. They should have looked critically. He’s not a liar; he believed the information he was purveying, and part of it was valuable. But his goal was to get the U.S. to invade Iraq.”

After the failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, Chalabi's name became a kind of byeword for the alleged distortions and rampant misplacement of trust that allegedly resulted in the U.S. invasion of Iraq. "Iceman," the secretive intelligence source whose information pushes the U.S. and Great Britain to war in "In The Loop," filmmaker Armando Iannucci's 2009 satire about the run-up to the Iraq war, is likely a winking reference to Chalabi.

An open rift with the Bush administration over the INC's usefulness and Chalabi's alleged embezzlement of U.S. financial support left the ever-opportunistic former exile looking for a new patron. So Chalabi "disclosed to an Iranian official that the United States had broken the secret communications code of Iran's intelligence service" according to a 2004 New York Times report.

The fact that Chalabi's name has resurfaced, and that American policymakers think of a dubiously-trustful Iranian intelligence source as a credible replacement for Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki, reveals the near total lack of good U.S. policy options in Iraq at the moment. It's increasingly apparent that the Obama administration wants Maliki gone. The price of that policy could be having to deal with Chalabi a second time around.


Chalabi Could Be The Country's Next Prime Minister - Business Insider
 
Days before Mosul’s capture, pleas to Iraq’s top generals fell on deaf ears
Hugh Naylor June 19, 2014

iraq-june-19.jpg


EASTERN NINEVEH PROVINCE // Five days before Iraq’s second largest city fell into the hands of an Al Qaeda splinter group, two of the country’s most senior army commanders strode into a room at a military base within Mosul’s airport and took seats before a group of anxious local politicians.

Militants from the Islamic State in Iraq and Levant had already begun their fierce assault to capture the city and the two generals had just arrived from Baghdad to oversee the defence of the city.

During a series of frantic meetings, local leaders urged them to avoid civilian causalities in the attempt to repel the militants and offered to coordinate their efforts.

The generals appeared to show little understanding of their concerns.

“That day the military started attacking the city with artillery and other strikes,” said Noufal Al Aqoub, who heads the legislative committee of Nineveh province’s regional council. “We asked them to stop these random attacks. We said, ‘Make this a last resort. Let us evacuate the areas first’.” The generals ignored their pleas.

In less than a week, ISIL had captured Mosul in fighting that killed scores of residents, forced hundreds of thousands to flee and left the Iraqi military in tatters.

The two generals – Abboud Qanbar, head of Baghdad’s operational command, and Ali Gheidan, who heads Iraq’s ground forces – had escaped to a nearby military base controlled by Kurdish Peshmerga forces, before boarding a plane back to Baghdad.

The scenes of chaos that led to the fall of Mosul and the disintegration of the United States-trained and funded military paved the way for ISIL’s success. In the days that followed, its fighters captured huge swaths of territory, in an offensive that took them to within 60km of Baghdad. The campaign threatens to dismember Iraq and ignite full-scale sectarian war between Sunnis and Shiites.

Mosul fell to a well-planned assault by an ISIL force likely backed by other tribal militia and Baathist militants once loyal to Saddam Hussein. But the meeting between the generals and councilmen shows how public anger at the central government and deep distrust of the military played into the militants’ hands.

Residents of the city had long complained of the way security forces conducted themselves in Mosul. Arbitrary arrests and beatings were commonplace because of a 2005 antiterror law that gave authorities sweeping powers. Like many Sunnis in Iraq, Mosul’s residents began to see the largely Shiite force as a sectarian tool.

“Many people of Mosul did not oppose ISIL activities because the military and security forces are seen as a Shiite force and the people who they arrested and harassed in the city are largely Sunni,” said Sirwan Zahawi, an analyst and former Iraqi parliamentarian. “That made the city ripe for the taking.”

The generals were dispatched to Mosul by Nouri Al Maliki, the Iraqi prime minister, according to interviews with Kurdish intelligence officers, political analysts and members of the Nineveh provincial council based in Mosul.

During the meeting on the morning of June 5, the councilmen described the generals as imperious and dismissive. Gen Qanbar dismissed their objections to the military’s heavy shelling of parts of the city that were under ISIL attack, said Mr Al Aqoub. Civilian casualties were mounting as a result.

“He just told us that in every war, there are civilian casualties,” Mr Al Aqoub said, speaking at a hotel in the Kurdish-Iraqi capital of Erbil. “General Gheidan then nodded his head in agreement and said: ‘In every war, there are always five per cent casualties’.”

In a separate meeting with the generals later that day, Bashar Mahmoud, an ethnic Kurd who headed the 39-member provincial council, said the generals were confident that the militants would be repelled. But Gen Qanbar refused to discuss details.

“He told me not to worry, that he would sort the situation out,” said Mr Mahmoud. “I felt surprised, but I was also alarmed.

“These people are not from Mosul and they didn’t understand the city,” he said.

By the time the meetings ended, the councilmen said they could hear explosions and gunfire in the city’s July 17th area. The ISIL assault was fully under way, with several neighbourhoods falling to militants after what they said was a rapid build-up of their activity over the previous two days.

According to analysts, ISIL’s blitzkrieg was carefully coordinated and planned long before then.

“[ISIL’s] campaign of taking over Mosul has been ongoing and under way ... from October 2013, and throughout that period it has targeted security officials, journalists, local government officials, as well as neighbourhood government representatives known as mukhtars,” said Ahmed Ali, senior Iraq analyst at the Washington-based Institute for the Study of War.

Still, there appeared to no shortage of soldiers and police officers in the Nineveh province and its capital Mosul in the run-up to the ISIL assault.

Khalaf Al Hadidi, a councilman in charge of strategic planning, said the province was defended by more than 60,000 soldiers, 25,000 officers from the local and federal police forces and thousands of security-intelligence agents.

The ISIL attack on Mosul was carried out with between 200 and 400 fighters, city leaders said.

Mr Al Hadidi said the military failed to respond to signs of the impending attack. He said in late May his bodyguard received a phone call from an informant working with fugitive former Baathist officers suspected of coordinating the ISIL attack from Syria.

The call warned that a convoy of 25 white Toyota pickup trucks had crossed the border from Syria to a militant stronghold about 100 kilometres west of Mosul.

“That information alarmed everyone,” said Mr Al Hadidi, who reported it to the councilman in charge of security issues, Mohammed Ibrahim.

When vehicles of a similar make and colour were spotted entering the city on June 2, he said the council called for a meeting with Nineveh commander, Lt Gen Mahdi Al Gharrawi.

That meeting took place on June 4. While discussing the security situation, Lt Gen Gharrawi received a telephone call from one of his commanders about the military’s seizure of 40 explosive devices in Mosul’s July 17th neighbourhood.

“We realised something major was happening,” said Mr Al Hadidi.

The following day the council met the two generals, and the military imposed a curfew between 7pm and 6am. The council decided to back the military operations, although its members held deep reservations over its tactics and said they were kept in the dark in terms of operations.

They could only watch on as militants captured that day the Ghazalani military base, a major weapons depot. Or when ISIL militants looted banks and started breaking into prisons and freeing hundreds of inmates as the city fell. Or when an armoured vehicle packed with explosives rammed on June 9 the Mosul International Hotel, which had been used as an impromptu security base.

“We were holding a council meeting when the truck exploded,” said Mr Al Aqoub, the legislative committee head who felt the blast at the council’s headquarters.

By 10pm that night, a colleague called the council’s military head, Mr Ibrahim, for an update. “He said leave the city as quickly as you can.”

“We didn’t know whether the officers were still in charge, or whether they had left,” said Mr Al Aqoub. After taking refuge at the fortified offices of the Kurdistan Democratic Party, he fled Mosul at 3am on June 10 to Tilkef, a village 10km north of the city under the control of Kurdish Peshmerga forces.

That also happened to be where Generals Qanbar and Gheidan had fled, along with scores of deserting soldiers who abandoned to the Peshmerga 20 US-made Humvee military vehicles, said Mr Mahmoud, the provincial council head who has a home in Tilkef.

“When they arrived in Tilkef, they went to the Peshmerga base. When I saw them there, there was a feeling of embarrassment,” he said of the generals.

“They came up to me personally and said: ‘We’re sorry. There’s nothing we can do’.”

Generals Qanbar and Gheidan then left for Erbil’s airport to return to Baghdad, Mr Mahmoud said.

The Nineveh commander Lt Gen Gharrawi, along with at least three other officers involved in the fighting, was dismissed by the prime minister on Tuesday for fleeing his post.


Days before Mosul’s capture, advice to Iraq’s top generals fell on deaf ears | The National
 
Iraq Eyes Czech Mi 24 helos To Combat ISIL Militants
Jun. 20, 2014 -By JAROSLAW ADAMOWSKI


WARSAW
— Czech Defense Minister Martin Stropnicky has announced the Czech Republic is in talks to sell Russian-built Mil Mi-24 helicopters to the Iraqi Defense Ministry.

“They have shown interest in the helicopters,” Stropnicky told local daily Mlada fronta DNES.

Currently, the Czech Air Force operates 17 Mi-24 helos. Of these, seven aircraft could be sold to the Iraqi government, according to Czech ministry officials.

The minister said that, in addition to the helos, the Iraqi government has expressed interest in purchasing Aero L-159 light combat aircraft, which are made by Czech producer Aero Vodochody.

Should the deal go through, the helos will be modernized and Iraqi pilots will undergo training in the Czech Republic. The copters are to be used to bolster Iraqi efforts to combat Sunni insurgents in the country’s north, where militants of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) captured several cities this month.

The twin-engine aircraft is a combat helo with transport capabilities. It is enabled with a maximum speed of 310 kilometers per hour, has a load capacity of 2.4 tons, and a flight range of 750 kilometers, according to data from the Czech Defense Ministry. The aircraft is manufactured by the Moscow Mil helicopter plant.

The Czech copters are estimated to be worth about 34.5 million krona (US $1.7 million) each, which would put the potential deal at about $12 million. ■

Iraq Eyes Czech Mi 24 helos To Combat ISIL Militants | Defense News | defensenews.com
 
It's all about belief. Iraqi soldiers probably did not have enough faith in the outcome of the situation. And it is not like the Americans haven't been known to retreat.

Didn't have enough faith? The Iraqis had numbers, tanks and other mechanized vehicles as well as artillery and air support to counter terrorists invading their country. If it was a conventional army yeah that would be different but instead I see a few terrorists taking many cities to the point of closing on the Iraqi capitol. It be like Al Qaeda taking over Washington and the U.S. military giving up without a fight because of dire situation. Think the Americans retreat to that?
 
Didn't have enough faith? The Iraqis had numbers, tanks and other mechanized vehicles as well as artillery and air support to counter terrorists invading their country. If it was a conventional army yeah that would be different but instead I see a few terrorists taking many cities to the point of closing on the Iraqi capitol. It be like Al Qaeda taking over Washington and the U.S. military giving up without a fight because of dire situation. Think the Americans retreat to that?

No, I am sure the Americans would stand their ground to the last man. However, I must repeat again that perhaps the Iraqi soldiers did not have enough faith in their situation, in their institution and in their leadership.

Besides, do you believe the American Military, given the same situation, would fight other Americans for political wars? This is more to do with Shia Sunni non-alignment rather then anything else I believe. Even your own government blames the Iraqi government for not reaching out to the Sunni's.

But at the end of the day mate, the world must thank America again for their beautiful gifts to the people of Iraq.
 
No, I am sure the Americans would stand their ground to the last man. However, I must repeat again that perhaps the Iraqi soldiers did not have enough faith in their situation, in their institution and in their leadership.

Besides, do you believe the American Military, given the same situation, would fight other Americans for political wars? This is more to do with Shia Sunni non-alignment rather then anything else I believe. Even your own government blames the Iraqi government for not reaching out to the Sunni's.

But at the end of the day mate, the world must thank America again for their beautiful gifts to the people of Iraq.

Its called American Civil War. And even during the American Revolution the colonists fought each other. The Loyalists and the Patriots.
0_6ab9f_81df06fb_XXL.jpg
 
just what the Russians said before the fall of the USSR


Again, I just have to laugh when I read your signature. A Pakistani saying the U.S. is a shitty country. Talk about irony. You guys have warlords over there, don't you ? In 2014. Holy f*ck !! What warlord do you follow ? And isn't there a big hunk of your country the government ISN'T ALLOWED to go to ? And the whole 'hiding Bin Laden thing'. VERY NICE !! :rofl::usflag:
 
Last edited:
Again, I just have to laugh when I read your signature. A Pakistani saying the U.S. is a shitty country. Talk about irony. You guys have warlords over there, don't you ? In 2014. Holy f*ck !! What warlord do you follow ? And isn't there a big hunk of your country the government ISN'T ALLOWED to go to ? And the whole 'hiding Bin Laden thing'. VERY NICE !!
then dont read my signature?
 
Yaar have ISIS even faced a pure fight in IRAQ? Have the army over there stopped and decided to fight it out before retreating? The thing is open retreat before fighting is soo demoralizing that its shocking. I believe if they actually get their heads in gear and focus on fighting and not retreating then they can put the ISIS on the back foot. For them to rise and quickly take over cities show two things. Incompetence of the military forces and the well equipped strength of the terrorist group. Yes ISIS is strong and well equipped but losing cities like this is inexcusable.

They are not facing america who had air forces and tanks. they are facing a terrorist organization. They need to be firm and use both aerial and tank assaults to re-capture the cities. Otherwise if they continuously keep abandoning their posts then Iraq will find itself under the complete control of ISIS which will be the biggest blunder by both civilian and military forces in the history of time.

Right now this highlights the mess america left iraq with with its stupid and illegal war and be prepared as this mess will be seen in afghanistan too as the pashtun areas will fight to control the non-pashtun areas thus leading to a civil war.
 
Yaar have ISIS even faced a pure fight in IRAQ? Have the army over there stopped and decided to fight it out before retreating? The thing is open retreat before fighting is soo demoralizing that its shocking. I believe if they actually get their heads in gear and focus on fighting and not retreating then they can put the ISIS on the back foot. For them to rise and quickly take over cities show two things. Incompetence of the military forces and the well equipped strength of the terrorist group. Yes ISIS is strong and well equipped but losing cities like this is inexcusable.

They are not facing america who had air forces and tanks. they are facing a terrorist organization. They need to be firm and use both aerial and tank assaults to re-capture the cities. Otherwise if they continuously keep abandoning their posts then Iraq will find itself under the complete control of ISIS which will be the biggest blunder by both civilian and military forces in the history of time.

Right now this highlights the mess america left iraq with with its stupid and illegal war and be prepared as this mess will be seen in afghanistan too as the pashtun areas will fight to control the non-pashtun areas thus leading to a civil war.
what i want to know is iraqi army has abrams tanks what happened to them i dont see any photos of destroyed tanks
 
what i want to know is iraqi army has abrams tanks what happened to them i dont see any photos of destroyed tanks

This. Iraq had over 77 T-72 soviet made tanks and over 280 M1 abarhams. they have abt 212 aircraft in which they have an block 52 F=16 squadron with many helicopters at their disposals including the recent MI-35 procurement of pakistan from russia. 800,000 service men in their army including reserves.

Which is why i dont get how is it ISIS is finding it soo easy to take control of cities? Not too mention shia militant forces are fighting alongside the army. Why are soo many soldiers retreating from their posts? ( which is soo demoralizing its shocking. ) You are asking america for air strikes when you have your own planes to do so. atleast try to do air strikes on them. Try to fight them at their cities and free them with your military might. Its surprising to say the least the ineptness of their military might. Its like they dont care what goes on.

Like i said if this continues then Iraq will find itself under the control of a terrorist force who will only weaken it to a massive extent. TBH i see only one thing happening soo far. The break up of Iraq into three groups. The ISIS controlled area which will be sunni dominated area. The shia due to ineptness of the armed forces will leave them and take control of their dominated areas while the kurdish fighters will take control of theirs. Most probably the shia militant force will receive massive backing from iran.
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom