What's new

Iranian general defies sanctions once again, travels back to Moscow

.
Iranian general defies sanctions once again, travels back to Moscow
By Lucas Tomlinson

Published April 14, 2016
FoxNews.com

Iranian Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani has traveled to Moscow once again to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin and other high ranking officials in defiance of a United Nations ban forbidding him from international travel, multiple intelligence sources tell Fox News.

This marked Soleimani’s second trip to Moscow since July, days after a landmark nuclear agreement between Iran and world powers was reached on July 14.

Soleimani arrived in Moscow from Tehran early Thursday morning via private jet, a charter operated by Mahan Air, an Iranian airline.

He reportedly plans to stay in Moscow for 48 hours. This is the first face-to-face meeting between Soleimani and Putin since the Russian president ordered his military to begin a partial withdrawal of forces from Syria last month.

This week, Russia sent its first component of the advanced S-300 air defense system to Tehran, a delivery planned during Soleimani’s last trip to Moscow.

Using a private jet to travel to Moscow indicates that Soleimani wants to avoid public disclosure of his clandestine travels. Sources say that he has canceled a number of trips to Moscow recently, fearing that he would be exposed.

Soleimani was first designated a terrorist and sanctioned by the United States in 2005 for his role as a supporter of terrorism.

He is responsible for coordinating Shia-militias that killed hundreds of American troops in Iraq during the second Iraq war.

In October 2011, the U.S. Treasury Department tied Soleimani to the failed Iranian plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to the United States at a popular restaurant in Washington, D.C.

Soleimani’s Quds Force is part of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, charged with supporting proxy forces in the Middle East, particularly in Iraq, Lebanon and Yemen, in addition to Syria. At one point, Iran sent a few thousand troops to Syria to defend the regime of President Bashar al-Assad.

The Quds Force reports directly to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

Last weekend, Khamenei tweeted a photo of a gathering of his military commanders. A close-up photo of Soleimani was among the photos sent out.

In early March, Russia pulled out more than a dozen fighter jets from Syria, but dozens more remain. Moscow has recently sent its most advanced helicopter gunships to Syria to help Syrian forces battle ISIS in the historic city of Palmyra, an indication that Russia does not plan a complete withdrawal any time soon.

Sources tell Fox News Iran’s leadership was surprised by Putin’s decision to withdraw some of his forces and wants to coordinate next steps in Syria.

Since his last visit to Moscow in July, Soleimani has been seen in photos on social media leading Iranian-backed forces in Syria, including Hezbollah, not far from where the Russian military has established an air base in Latakia along the Mediterranean coast.

Months after Soleimani’s visit to Moscow, Russia began its deployment of military aircraft and troops to Syria to shore up Assad.

In Moscow in July, Soleimani is believed to have helped Russia draw up plans for its military intervention. Sources told Fox News, first to report Soleimani’s trip in July, that Iran wanted Syria to serve as a buffer between ISIS and Hezbollah, a Shia-Islamist group based in Lebanon.

In July, five days after Soleimani’s first visit to Moscow, Secretary of State John Kerry was asked if the Iranian general would ever receive sanctions relief as part of a deal with Iran.

“Under the United States’s initiative, Qassem Soleimani will never be relieved of any sanctions,” Kerry testified on Capitol Hill.

Tear up the bogus nuke 'agreement' ( It will be torn up in about nine months, anyway), ratchet up sanctions to the fullest on BOTH and watch them twitch.:hang2:

He's traveling all around the ME wherever whenever he desires to do so and I assure you that you can not do a $hit about it ... and your concern about him just shows how he's been successful in his missions ...
On tearing up the agreement such a thing ain't gonna happen it could blow your stance in the world as a Gov that even fails to adhere to the principles it's been preaching others about ... and be sure we have no problem with that ....
 
.
All this bullshit coming from an IRANIAN, of all people is funny. The only way it could be funnier is if it came from a North Korean. Remember genius, you're Iranian. HAHAHAHAHA !!!!:usflag:
The wisest decision that your commanders can make is to make the tissues a standard equipment for your marines in the Persian gulf:
139411211525465057088414.jpg


oh I forgot, and scarf for women:
139411211524382837088384.jpg
 
. . .
Go read what they did to our solders back in 80s in Persian gulf during Iran Iraq war and see how we were kind to these sailors ...

I know everything. But I still can understand both sides. At the end we all are humans and so I feel sorry for them. Do you understand what I mean? :D
 
. .
Eventhough I feel sorry for those soldiers, I mean they are human and do their duty - you destroyed that guy :D

media_4641b7b0-33b4-11e5-9bfb-2916713ca3fb.gif
1.we treated them nicely, and we we filmed our hospitality, this is not our fault that their soldiers are so weak to cry even in such a nice environment, remember the British soldier who wet his pants? This is what they are and I don't see any reason to hide their weakness. in case of British army they should consider diapers!

2.The one who was humiliated wasn't that soldier, but rather American army. I assure you none of Americans who whine about morals give a sh!t about him, this is their own pride which was ruined and they try to hide it behind their propaganda.

3. they asked us to publish that footage:
Despicable: Look who Iran says was CRYING when our Sailors were captured
we didn't want to let them down.

4.is it bad to show a murder crying after his arrest? no, at all.
That's your mistake, forgetting his position. we are not talking about an innocent citizen, but a man who serves the murders. the murders who have killed millions of people.
 
Last edited:
.
1.we treated them nicely, and we we filmed our hospitality, this is not our fault that their soldiers are so weak to cry even in such a nice environment, remember the British soldier who wet his pants? This is what they are and I don't see any reason to hide their weakness. in case of British army they should consider diapers!

2.The one who was humiliated wasn't that soldier, but rather American army. I assure you none of Americans who whine about morals give a sh!t about him, this is their own pride which was ruined and they try to hide it behind their propaganda.

3. they asked us to publish that footage:
Despicable: Look who Iran says was CRYING when our Sailors were captured
we didn't want to let them down.

4.is it bad to show a murder crying after his arrest? no, at all.
That's your mistake, forgetting his position. we are not talking about an innocent citizen, but a man who serves the murders. the murders who have killed millions of people.


Well let me express myself more clear.

First of all crying is not a weakness bro, let that be clear, showing emotions is one of the things that makes us special.

I am not talking about humiliation. We did use the footage as every other nation would do. I am talking about the soldiers themselves. I feel sorry for them, I can understand their fear and why they are crying. Do not forget our poor soldiers that were caught by terrorists and brought into pakistani soil.
They did fear for their lives and that is the same situation. We are all human.

Also you must consider that from americans point of view they never did murder people, they see themselves as liberators. Moreover you can't just generalize and call them all murders. We can't just judge and we should'nt. What I simply wanted to express was I feel sorry for them, they were really scared (no matter if there was or was not a reason - it is natural).
 
Last edited:
.
Yeah, they can. But I kind of agree with you. I think the U.S. should quit the U.N., shut it down, throw all the spies and scofflaws out of the country and bulldoze the buildings into the East River. That way, when we get a REAL President in the White House, we can really put the screws to Iran and not have the U.N. screw things up and whine like fairies.:usflag:
Aren't you Donald Trump? You perfectly sound like him. He is obsessed with Iran too.
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom