@Raghfarm007 @MyNameAintJeff
"the proof is in the putting"
HIV/AIDs was overwhelmingly caused by gay men. and even to this day, overwhelmingly affects them. but its still different to monkeypox, where virutally every single case is coming back to 2 gay men.
I dont know if your trying to be woke, or just want to play devils advocate or what? By lying about this, its actually causes it to spread far faster. As alot of the infected seemed to have 20+ sex partners and engaged in orgys as a normal way of life. Perhaps if the truth came out actually, people (even gay dudes) could be suffieciently warned which would really help slow its spread.
pretending its a random disease anybody walking down can catch is far more dangerous then calling out a fact.
As far as HIV / AIDS is concerned, several points can be made which tend to call into question the mainstream narratives promoted both by pharmaceutical corporations and by the globalist oligarchy, which is known to be instrumentalizing health issues in order to avance its agenda of a totalitarian, masonic one-world regime, consecutive to the dismantling of nation-states and historically rooted religious faith systems:
1) Consumption of so-called "poppers" is particularly high among homosexuals, due to certain physiological effects they trigger (it's interesting to note that these same drugs are patented by the US pharmaceutical firm Burroughs Wellcome, which used to advertize them in the homosexualist press). However, they also have immunodepressant side effects, which expose consumers to viral infections as well as to complications stemming from such infections, namely in association with HIV. Moreover research revealed a link between "poppers" and the development of Kaposi's sarcoma, one of the main causes of death in AIDS patients. Of course it didn't take too long for other papers to surface which denied this link, presumably commissioned by the pharmaceutical mafia. At any rate, this is an explanatory factor for the fact that homosexuals represent a high-risk group for HIV infection and AIDS.
2) When it comes to the African continent, the widescale spread of HIV was due to the fact that the downtrodden people of sub-Saharan Africa are afflicted by particular public health issues which happen to be more pronounced there as compared to the rest of the world, such as unbalanced nutrition, permanent oxydative stress and pre-existing illness, which compromise the immune system and facilitate infection with HIV as well as aggravation of the disease.
The following clip is simply astonishing and immensely eye-opening, so I'd really urge all those of you who value critical thought to watch it:
Here's the full documentary the above excerpt is taken from:
Explore a whole universe of videos on Odysee from regular people just like you!
odysee.com
Now if you know who professor Luc Montagnier was, you'll aptly gauge the true weight his shocking statements carry. Indeed, this French researcher was none other than the discoverer of HIV and a subsequent Nobel Prize winner, in other words an unquestionable pundit in this field.
References like these are extremely useful when debating persons who will argue in favor of the official version, because they're on another scientific level than ordinary YouTubers and because unlike the latter, they cannot simply be dismissed as tinfoil hat wearing nobodies with no expertise of what they're actually talking about, nor be accused that their motivation merely resides in making a buzz so as to accumulate "views" on social media.
Not only is Montagnier brilliantly exposing the spin on HIV / AIDS sponsored by multinational corporations as well as their massive army of deceitful, avaricious medical ghost writers and willful collaborators, but he's also dropping names of some of the oligarchic bigwigs involved in these schemes, such as Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci. Simple ways of preventing infection with HIV were obfuscated because they would have deprived big pharma of the lucrative sale of medication.
But it gets better yet: during the past two years, Professor Montagnier came out against the manipulations surrounding the Covid-19 pandemic. In particular, he arrived to the conclusions that this is not a natural disease and was designed in a laboratory, that the vaccines offered by big pharma give rise by themselves to new strains of the virus, declared that he's scandalized as to how the vaccination of children is being envisaged, validates the findings of the highly renowned Indian team of researchers according to which Covid-19 incorporates a genetic sequence from HIV, stressing that scientists are sell outs who will toe the line promoted by powerful elite interests. We know they usually do this either because they derive financial profit out of it, or due to group think - not to mention peer pressure and those who fear social exclusion in case they dared to speak their mind openly.
YouTube is notorious for having censored, as in literally removed every single upload of some of Montagnier's declarations on the coronavirus. Now ask yourselves, why are they panicking this much about the eventuality that people might have access to alternative views from a heavyweight scientist on topics like this? Why will the oligarchy curtail free speech to such an extent in supposed liberal "democracies"?
Professor Luc Montagnier passed away in February 2022, may God rest his brave upright soul. The French regime and streamlined French media have a habit of singing praises of influential figures who hailed from that country after their demise, and to portray them as national heroes of sorts (this goes for pop singers and sports champions all the way to serious scientists). Montagnier's passing however was thoroughly ignored and its news boycotted by the mainstram media, following a period in which they were disparaging him during the latter phase of his career, with titles such as "The slow scientific sinking of professor Luc Montagnier" carried by major French newspaper Le Figaro in 2017 (newspaper owned by the Dassault Group, France's largest arms manufacturer with extensive links to the zionist regime).
In conclusion, I'd like to highlight the danger big pharma is posing to free nations. Much like the food industries, this certainly is one of the most cut-throat, underhanded, greedy, criminal private interests groups at the global level, but much like the food industries, its mischief is not directly obvious to many who imagine that these corporations are pursuing the common good of mankind and are involved in an altruistic mission owing to the type of commodities they sell.
Nothing could be farther from the truth though. And it's not really hard to see why, if only you'll consent to thinking of it for a second: we're talking about capitalist corporations, whose immediate goal by definition does not consist in the well being of the citizenry, but in reckless profit maximization. Hence why it's so crucial to extract and to shield the public health sector including pharmaceutical industries from the rules of the unbridled free market.
At least in Islamic Iran, the pharmaceutical industry is almost entirely domestic, and multinational giants exert no control over it. This means that the government at all times retains the possibility to regulate the sector and rein it in where needed. We still have some way to go, given that in-house liberals with a globalist mindset are enjoying a prominent presence in the medical and pharmaceutical sectors in Iran, as well as in the local food industry and agro-business. However, as long as multinationals are kept out of the equation, there's room for fixing any outstanding issues. By contrast, if said multinationals had been allowed to gain a foothold, efficient control by state authorities would have become virtually impossible. Now, reformists and moderates are longing precisely for an entry of global corporations into Iranian markets. Surprised, anyone?
Likewise, both big pharma and multinational food industries represent branches of and are intimately linked to the oppressive globalist oligarchy. As such, their activity, the interpretations and faked research results they direct their ghost writers to generate, cannot be fully understood from the sole economic angle. Ultimately there is a properly nightmarish, totalitarian, nefarious agenda of global domination and oppression, along with corresponding esoteric beliefs underlying the sinister doings of these multinational corporations. In our Islamic religion, we find every resource needed to identify and stand against this form of
zolm.
I sincerely hope our well-inspired decision makers in Iran are thoroughly informed (far better than me, inshAllah) about the threats posed by these globalist mafias.
