What's new

Iranian Chill Thread

Last edited:

another $3M-5M dollars down the drain....

The drastic decline and complete stop of videos for months on end really is a good anti-advertising. Not because the drone is bad, but because it was advertised as something it wasn't meant to be.
 
Thanks for clarification...if the Iranian
newspaper story has any legs to stand on we should be able to have recordings of Iranian Tower or AD conversations with the incoming non scheduled flight from Turkey ...I will update if any more news on our side
"Erdoghan's arse was saved by Iran", do you expect officials whether from Turkey or Iran to announce it?!
 
در حالی که همه منتظر عملیات در شمال سوریه اند نباید احتمال عملیات در جنوب رو نادیده گرفت

ورود زمینی اسراییل مستقیما یا در پوشش اردن و بافر امنیتی در حاشیه اردن​


ملک عبدالله دوم، پادشاه اردن، در مصاحبه در مصاحبه‌ای که متن آن امروز یکشنبه منتشر شده است، از حملات «شبه‌نظامیان مرتبط با ایران» به مرزهای اردن انتقاد کرده است. به نظر می‌رسد تنش‌ها پس از درگیری مرگبار با قاچاقچیان مواد مخدر در مرز این کشور با سوریه شدت گرفته است.
پادشاه اردن به روزنامه الرأی چاپ اردن گفت که اردن «در مرزهای خود با حملات منظم شبه‌نظامیان مرتبط با ایران مواجه است.»
ملک عبدالله دوم خواستار «تغییر رفتار ایران» شد و گفت که اردن «خواهان تنش در منطقه نیست».
او گفت «اردن همچون دیگر کشورهای عربی در پی روابط خوب با ایران است که مبتنی بر احترام متقابل، حسن همجواری، احترام به حاکمیت سایر کشورها و عدم مداخله در امور آنها باشد.
—————

اردن با این کار خودش رو از نظر زیر ساخت بیچاره میکنه حتی اگر از نظر زمینی پیشروی کنه​

در مورد اردن روابطی مثل دوجانبه مثل ترکیه وجود نداره و خط قرمز کمتری هست​
 
The drastic decline and complete stop of videos for months on end really is a good anti-advertising. Not because the drone is bad, but because it was advertised as something it wasn't meant to be.

The reason TB-2 was even deadly was because it went up against Syrian forces with very little AD and Russians who were in blitzkrieg mode any ADs that traveled with them weren’t even in turned on/deployed most of the time.

Now the Russian’s have the radar signature of TB-2, you “feed” it to your radars to focus on such objects during their scan. Hence they get destroyed pretty easily. Also Russians have deployed their air defenses much better after the first 60 day debacle.

I’m more impressed with US/Israel detecting Iranian RQ-170 variants it’s probably the small turboprop versions but still the RCS on those are much smaller than a TB-2.
 
The reason TB-2 was even deadly was because it went up against Syrian forces with very little AD and Russians who were in blitzkrieg mode any ADs that traveled with them weren’t even in turned on/deployed most of the time.

Now the Russian’s have the radar signature of TB-2, you “feed” it to your radars to focus on such objects during their scan. Hence they get destroyed pretty easily. Also Russians have deployed their air defenses much better after the first 60 day debacle.

I’m more impressed with US/Israel detecting Iranian RQ-170 variants it’s probably the small turboprop versions but still the RCS on those are much smaller than a TB-2.
They said something about advanced warning.

It's possible it was sighted by US ISR aircraft in Iraq on it's way to Israel, and the info was subsequently relayed forward. Maybe just a bit of bad luck. It makes you wonder, was their many flights before then, and this one just happen to get caught?
 
Why US will never accept “One China principle”

He points to Taiwan's TSMC, the world's biggest chips manufacturer, that plans to invest $100 billion over the next three years to maintain its global dominance. The U.S., meanwhile, has fallen behind Asian chipmakers like TSMC and Samsung in advanced chip technology. Intel and other chipmakers heavily rely on TSMC for 5-nanometer chips—the world’s most efficient and most advanced—as the Taiwanese firm accounts for 92% of the globe’s supply, according to Capital Economics. It’d have to "spend much more, with no guarantee of success, just to get even in terms of technology," Kumar says. Intel has said it’s building new fab plants across Europe, Israel, and the U.S. at a cost of $44 billion to try to catch up.



By capturing Taiwan, China would have major monopoly on world chip production (outside of South Korea). In a future (hot or cold) conflict with US, it can weaponize global chip supply and cause hundreds of billions in dollars in losses to US companies much and a global recession.

For this reason, Taiwan must remain “independent” at all costs in US interests.
 
Why US will never accept “One China principle”

He points to Taiwan's TSMC, the world's biggest chips manufacturer, that plans to invest $100 billion over the next three years to maintain its global dominance. The U.S., meanwhile, has fallen behind Asian chipmakers like TSMC and Samsung in advanced chip technology. Intel and other chipmakers heavily rely on TSMC for 5-nanometer chips—the world’s most efficient and most advanced—as the Taiwanese firm accounts for 92% of the globe’s supply, according to Capital Economics. It’d have to "spend much more, with no guarantee of success, just to get even in terms of technology," Kumar says. Intel has said it’s building new fab plants across Europe, Israel, and the U.S. at a cost of $44 billion to try to catch up.



By capturing Taiwan, China would have major monopoly on world chip production (outside of South Korea). In a future (hot or cold) conflict with US, it can weaponize global chip supply and cause hundreds of billions in dollars in losses to US companies much and a global recession.

For this reason, Taiwan must remain “independent” at all costs in US interests.
I agree with this. Ukraine doesn't do anything for the US. Taiwan is life threatening for them.
 
I agree with this. Ukraine doesn't do anything for the US. Taiwan is life threatening for them.
usa already have the production technology , in forrm if Intel Fabs which its chips are even denser than tsmc chips. so i doubt it be life threathening for them , they can build several other fabs based on that technology .
Europe and USA have GlobalFoundries also don't forget , Micron from USA, and Fuji Electronic and Kioxia from Japan , also SK Hynix and Samsung from S. Korea
 
usa already have the production technology , in forrm if Intel Fabs which its chips are even denser than tsmc chips. so i doubt it be life threathening for them , they can build several other fabs based on that technology .
Europe and USA have GlobalFoundries also don't forget , Micron from USA, and Fuji Electronic and Kioxia from Japan , also SK Hynix and Samsung from S. Korea
Understood, but 90% of the global supply being in Chinese hands is not an easy thing to overcome.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom