Salar all of the historic events show you wrong . economy and education take precedence other wise your population wont be a producing one , they become just baby factories that burden you .
Empirical data confirm what I explained. This is not "my" assessment, it's academic consensus among experts.
you want them for army , well they only be good as cannon fodder and militia just like Taliban , when they face an organized army they had to go and hide under the rock , you want them for industry , just look how good Afghanistan advance as an industry power house ,
what you guys envision for Iran just bring the standard of the living up to Indian levels . now a question for you how many of Indian population live on streets ?
The above is detached from facts and figures: Iran is miles away from being even remotely exposed to any of these risks, because its fertility rate has
fallen below replacement levels. The mentioned issues may arise if a country has a fertility rate comparable to current sub-Saharan ones (and I insist on may, because in past decades Iran herself experienced sustained demographic growth and rapid industrialization, strengthening of her national defence and of her population's living standards all at once).
But not if the figure is inferior to 2,1 as is the case of Iran, nor if it came to
stabilize in between 2,1 and 2,5 which is what any sane and well-meaning person will advocate for Iran right now. And this, in turn, will be totally impossible unless well funded, well thought out contingency measures are taken by Iranian authorities. It's now or never. It's life or death, no more and no less.
The Supreme Leader is in the know about this, which is why he sounded the alarm in no uncertain terms and asked the government to seriously address the existential hazard.
Either way, with the brutal demographic stagnation Iran is suffering at the moment, it's genuinely preposterous to attribute any relevance to economic and social challenges associated with over-population. They are not a topic that matters for Iran.
and no its not that demographic decline is irreversible , or not the question . you must ask why the families don't have children and fix that problem , that bring back what is said are more important
The fact that demographic decline is irreversible is established, and its the crux of the issue. Once the phenomenon sets in, there is no way back.
In effect there's not a single example of successful reversal of demographic decline in the modern era anywhere in the world. Every observable example, from Germany to south Korea via Russia demonstrates this.
Affected nations either open the floodgates for wild mass immigration, or end up desperately spending astronomic sums to redress their demography - to no avail whatsoever. At that point, the local globalist oligarchy gains the upper hand and manages to impose its immigrationist anti-national agenda against the waning resistance of the local population.
Case in point, south Korea which has spent more than 130 billion USD in this area. Result: steadily plummeting demographic growth, getting worse every year. The Koreans did conduct studies on why their citizens don't give birth to as many children as in the past - and they have excellent sociologists, economists and policy planners; they have been attempting to concentrate on the causes, they did all that. But it's too late, simple as that.
https://www.worldfinance.com/featured/baby-boom-or-bust-why-south-korea-is-desperately-trying-to-boost-its-birth-rate
Time is of the essence, because demographic crisis has this terribly nasty characteristic of being final and irreversible under present day conditions.
and by the way the border is already wide open , what it brought us , drive in tehran street , stuck behind red light and you see what that nonsense bring shia to Iran strategy bring here
Iran has no immigration policy: she is not encouraging immigration by design nor in a calculated and planned manner; likewise, efforts to assign a particular place to immigrants in society are limited. That's largely because immigration into Iran is stemming from only one single country, which happens to be Persian-speaking itself, namely Afghanistan.
Also,as I clearly mentioned, immigrants from Iran's immediate neighborhood and from the Iranian civilizational sphere are not going to cut it once there is economic urgency induced by a definitely stagnant demography.
By then, immigrants from other continents and faraway places with lower living standards than Iran - there are many of those around the world, and they abound with massive young populations, will have to be brought in en masse. Either that, or Iran will literally be finished. Well, as a distinct nation she'd be finished in either of these two cases!
Also, rule of thumb for a qualified social scientist: pictures don't imply anything on their own, especially when decontextualized and devoid of proper analysis.
you must decide what you want for those children you are so anxious to bring to this world
what i post above , or what i post below
There will be no future for anyone if demographic crisis is not tackled immediately. Iran will disappear from the map, or the children will look very different from the ones in those photographs, courtesy of intensive mixing of locals with migrants from thoroughly alien lands. Both options are attractive to Iran's zio-American enemies, as well as to their domestic fifth column.
To insist once more: development issues stemming from outright demographic explosion (i.e. fertility rates higher than 4 or 5)
do not apply in any shape or form to a country like Iran with an agonizing demography and a below replacement level fertility rate.
I will ask readers to pay particular attention and to carefully ponder what follows, for it is useful for gaining a solid understanding of how the globalist oligarchy that sits atop the empire is instrumentalizing demography, development and migration to advance its ruthless nation-wrecking agenda.
This offers, by the way, a brilliant illustration as to how and why this imperial oligarchy is an existential enemy to practically every nation, including to their own. Divisions are mercilessly exploited by these elites to divert people's attention away from what should rank first among their priorities: to put a decisive halt to this brutal empire's nefarious schemes.
The country of Rwanda in central Africa is enjoying some of the highest development standards among sub-Saharan nations. After the massive killings of the 1990's, it entered a period of sustained economic growth and social development. However, if you thought the globalist oligarchy and affiliated imperialist regimes would spare an Africans from mass immigration originating in alien parts of the world, think again. Africans too are being uprooted, and not just as emigrants towards the north, but right at home too: as soon as an African nation reaches sufficient development levels, it is forced to accept migrants from remote and culturally alien areas.
And so it happens that western regimes such as the UK have begun transferring Afghan and Syrian refugees to Rwanda, under the bogus pretext that room must be made in Britain for new arrivals from Ukraine!
https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/r...-first-deportation-flight-uk-schedule-1677669
https://news.sky.com/story/syrian-a...ation-flight-to-rwanda-say-charities-12625201
The globalists and their imperialist henchmen will never cease recycling the fallout of the wars of aggression which they themselves are triggering. From one engineered, managed crisis to the next, they proceed methodically and step by step towards their end goal, leaving behind an endless trail of immeasurable human suffering.
And they are not going to stop until they are either defeated by the Resistance, or successful in imposing their unified, totalitarian one-world government (universal republic) on an enslaved mankind. In that regime, there will be no place for any of the currently existing nations and states including Iran, nor for any of the currently existing, traditional faith systems including Islam, including Zoroastrianism.
Back on topic, you are looking right here at the future of Iran - at the "best" case scenario, that is. Unless the catastrophic demographic slump is reversed
now.