Mata Elang
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2022
- Messages
- 67
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
From here I can understand your character. Sorry to say this, it looks like your fanaticism is no different from ISIS.That would be a mistaken assumption. Zionist elites do care very much about even the remotest corner on earth, since their project is one of full spectrum domination over the human species and planet earth.
Furthermore, when it comes to Ukraine, zionists very much have a special interest as well as an extensive presence there. The fact that the current Ukrainian president of Jewish background incidentally happens to be a staunch supporter of the zionist occupation regime in Palestine is only the tip of the iceberg.
Here's a nice paper on the topic, English version obtained by online translator with mistakes edited by yours truly:
_____
Interview with Youssef Hindi
Ukraine is considered by a number of Israeli Jews as their property
Arthur Sapaudia: Dear Youssef, thank you for granting me this interview. When did you start to take an interest in the issues that concern you, that is to say, among others, Zionism, the clash of civilizations, Jewish messianism, secularism... What was your trigger?
Youssef Hindi: There was no trigger. I have been interested in politics, history, sociology, anthropology, geopolitics and many other fields since adolescence. I made a name for myself with my first book, Occident et Islam – Tome 1: Sources et genèse messianiques du Sionisme (2015, ed. Sigest), which is the result of my research on the religious origins of Zionism whose official history traced its birth to the late 19th century in the mind of Herzl, a Jewish atheist. My research on the subject, started ten years ago, was motivated by historiographical shortcomings in the genealogy of Zionism. This is what led me to study Jewish messianism and Jewish mysticism (the Kabbalah) about ten years ago. This is how I discovered the origins of Zionism and the strategy of the clash of civilizations. At the same time, I opened other research projects and wrote nine books in total to date.
Who are your precursors in the fields mentioned and what books would you recommend reading in addition to yours?
On the messianic origins of Zionism and the strategy of the clash of civilizations, I am the first, to my knowledge, to have traced its genealogy, from the 13th century to the present day. But like any researcher, I am not starting from scratch. Authors have allowed me, by their contributions as much as by their shortcomings, to advance and direct my research. Among them is the historian Shlomo Sand who believed that Zionism was born in the English millenarian Protestant circles of the 17th century. It was my disagreement with him, upon reading his 2008 book, How the Jewish People Was Invented?, that prompted me to research the Jewish origins of Zionism. He argued that the Zionist project could not have been born in the Jewish tradition since the Talmud forbade the return of the Jewish people to the Holy Land. And he believed, like Thierry Meyssan after him, that the idea of repatriating the Jewish people to Palestine to hasten the coming of the Messiah was exclusively Protestant millenarian. My intuition told me that these Protestant millennials had been influenced by Jewish messianism. It was not difficult for me to demonstrate. But the most difficult thing was to discover how this messianic Zionist project had emerged in the Jewish world.
A few years later, I read the fascinating book by the great reporter Douglas Reed, The Zion Controversy, which he wrote in the 1950s. Douglas Reed saw that Zionism had its roots in the Jewish religion, but he could not demonstrate it. His mistake was to link Zionism to the Talmud, while the latter forbids the return of Jews to the Holy Land before the arrival of the Messiah of the Jews. In defense of Douglas Reed, he was not a research historian or specialist in Judaism, and had no knowledge of Kabbalah; his book is, as he wrote in conclusion, a testimony that future historians had to validate with evidence.
It was then that I began to study the history, concepts and evolution of Jewish mysticism (the Kabbalah) and messianism, because I sensed that it was in this current that I would find the origins of the zionist project. So I immersed myself in the books of Gershom Scholem which were very useful to me in understanding Kabbalah and messianism. But there again, Scholem did not link Zionism to Kabbalah and messianism. And I had to do more precise research on key periods and characters to resolve this “historical problem”.
It is very difficult for a neophyte to distinguish between Gnosis, Kabbalah, messianism, alchemy, magic... How do you find your way around and what would be their common basis?
Kabbalah was strongly influenced by Gnosticism which originated from beliefs coming from both ancient Persian religion [Mazdeism], Greek religion and certainly other beliefs from both the Mediterranean and India via Mesopotamia. Kabbalah is composed of several branches: apocalyptic, cosmology, angelology, demonology and magic. As for Jewish messianism, it has, over the centuries, been largely penetrated by the Kabbalah. But I strongly advise against venturing into the study of Kabbalah for those who do not have a solid theological foundation. They will get lost there.
Do you think what is happening currently in Ukraine is an integral part of active messianism?
As I explained recently1, it is first of all about the geopolitical confrontation between the United States and Russia. This is the old strategy of the Anglo-American thalassocratic power, one of the main objectives of which is to take control of Eurasia. A project that is naturally opposed by Russia, a tellurocratic power, threatened with destruction. But Jewish messianism is not far away. Ukraine is considered by a number of Israeli Jews as their property. Moreover, President Zelinski is himself a Jew, just like his master, the billionaire Igor Kolomoïski (holder of Ukrainian, Israeli and Cypriot nationalities) who financed the neo-Nazi battalions of Ukraine. Kolomoiski also lives in Israel.
In an article published in September 2015, I analyzed the Zionist strategy vis-à-vis Russia2, which was combined with US geostrategy. Israel, via the pro-Israeli lobby3, uses, in particular since the turning point of September 11, 2001, the United States and NATO as a tool for the destruction of Russia's historical allies in the Middle East, which leads to even greater animosity between Russians and Americans.
At the same time, the Zionist leaders are trying, through intermediaries, to negotiate with Russia so that it abandons its Syrian and Iranian allies. In July 2013, Prince Bandar, as a representative of Saudi Arabia (Israel's ally), met with Vladimir Putin during the Syrian crisis. During the talks, Bandar allegedly proposed an economic, oil and gas agreement to Vladimir Putin, in exchange for which he would have to let go of Iran, abandon President Assad and deliver Syria to terrorists4. At the time, I analyzed the fire lit a few months later in Ukraine as an American-Israeli response to the Russian refusal. Moreover, Israel was preparing to deliver weapons to Ukraine a month or two after the start of the civil war. Putin then warned the Jewish state.
1 https://strategika.fr/2022/02/26/le...tan-russie-conference-audio-de-youssef-hindi/
2 http://www.geopolintel.fr/article970.html
3 John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, The pro-Israel lobby and American foreign policy, La Découverte, 2007.
4 Al Manar, “What was not revealed about the stormy Bandar-Putin encounter”, August 21, 2013.
5 Sputnik, “Putin warns Israel against arms deliveries to Kyiv”, 18 April 2015.
https://sapaudia.org/2022/03/07/entretien-avec-youssef-hindi-03-22/
_____
Not sure what you define as backstabbing. It's not a secret that the agendas of Russia and the Resistance Axis in Syria aren't entirely identical, but they also have major objectives in common and furthermore there's a degree of interdependence stemming from the ground reality (for instance, Russia knows its air power and Russian-trained SAA ground forces alone will not suffice to maintain the status quo, and that there's no substitute for Iran and her allies in the infantry department).
This doesn't qualify as betrayal, since Russia never gave assurances to Iran that it would join the Resistance against zionism. And this was clear to the Resistance from the beginning. Making sure the zionists won't target Russian assets in Syria is not an act of hostility towards the Resistance.
Furthermore, I'd take any assessment beginning with the claim that Russia is the de facto ruler of Syria with a grain of salt. Not to mention that even if it was the case, it would imply that Moscow has no issues with the extensive military presence of Iranian and allied forces all over liberated parts of Syria, including the Golan.
Of course they won't take an openly firm stance. The whole idea is to leave a door open for Russia while maintaining pressure on her via the zionist, russophobic and NATO-backed Ukrainian regime, and instrumental the crisis they provoked (the western regimes' responsibility in bringing about this crisis was correctly pointed to by our Supreme Leader).
Isra"el"'s condition for reining in their NATO and Ukrainian vassals, is that Moscow severe its ties with Iran and President Bashar Al-Assad's government, and let takfiri and/or sectarianist terrorists take control of Syria. It's a sophisticated form of blackmail.
They will lose and their territory will be conquered by Russia anyway. I very much doubt that Russia is going to annex the entirety of Ukraine, let alone enslave its citizens.
But, the Ukrainian regime has mostly itself to blame for the destruction, given that it let itself be manipulated by NATO into continually provoking Russia and violating the 2014 Minsk Agreement. Russia showed patience and restraint for more than seven years before deciding to put a forceful end to these games.
As explained above, the background picture is even more complex than that. Interests and survival indeed, including from Russia's perspective, her own survival in the face of NATO's destructive designs.
That's not exactly what happened. Iran did not deal with the zionist regime, but with the Americans, who then resorted to Isra"el"i stocks of weapons in order to blur out their own role (remember the Reagan regime had failed to inform Congress as it should have, since it was a covert undertaking). Furthermore, the US never intended to help Iran: rather it was Iran which, after escalating massively in Lebanon, and in exchange for mediating the release of western hostages held there, forced the US to agree to token arms deliveries
Also, there's a significant difference between, on the one hand, pressuring your enemy to supply a few arms - which, as said were extremely limited in numbers, only because the military you inherited from the former western-aligned regime was almost entirely made of western weaponry and you didn't have the time to develop your own defence industries yet, and on the other hand, acting as a full-blown lackey to foreign powers and following their wishes even if it's to your own detriment, as the pro-western regime in Kiev has been doing.
Ukraine's alliance with the west is not a consequence of the war, and preceded it by many years. Russia was not asking for Ukraine to come into its exclusive fold, but would have been content if Kiev followed a neutral line similar to Austria during the Cold War.
I'd submit that there's no bigotry in the above analyses.
No contextual information available. It's possible that the two civilians were targeted intentionally, it's possible that those firing the shots were Russians indeed, but other potential explanations can't be excluded out of hand.
Civilians, especially children, women and elderly falling victim to conflicts is always horrible, no matter where such a thing takes place. This said, more evidence is needed to be able to solidly conclude that Russia targeted these civilians in a deliberate manner. A certain amount of collateral damage is unfortunately inevitable, especially in urban settings. What's important is that everything conceivable is done to avoid such damage.
I can't see anyone laying on the ground after the blast. Not sure that lethal ammunition was used here.
A person seemingly shot in the knee / leg, we don't know by whom, why etc. Police violence on a normal day in the US looks worse than this, honestly.
Again, those almost certainly aren't lethal munitions, since persons hit are standing up and start walking again.
Russia, while having faults of its own, is not remotely as oppressive as the zionist and American regimes. Which is why Islamic Iran is resisting the latter and entering certain partnerships with the former.
I understand many of our Indonesian friends are still marked by the radical anti-communism of the bipolar era, and by extension may tend to project antagonistic views on post-Soviet Russia as well, but times have changed and so has the geopolitical reality. Russia is no longer the Soviet Union, which used to be an illegitimate empire indeed; but this doesn't apply to its successor state, the Russian Federation. You're entitled to take issue with Moscow's policies, but it is not a state that needs regime change like the US or Isra"el".
Your fanaticism/obsession has gone too far and it makes your mind and heart cloudy. Love fanaticism and obsession that is too excessive will make you always justify the mistakes of your masters, even though there is evidence that they are wrong.
Your writing is so long but the meaning is 'empty', but I will answer your writing simply.
This means that you are implying that the Iranian Jews are allies of the Zionists. Imam Khomeini said "Iran's enemies are not Jews but Zionists".
Zionists do not care and do not provide weapons to Ukraine https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.mi...ses-repeated-ukrainian-requests-for-arms/amp/ .
As I've said before Putin only cares about his 'interests' i.e. his military base in Syria, that's why he turned down prince Bandar's offer (If Russia didn't have a military base they would never help Syria).
You say Russia/Putin doesn't want to be part of the 'resistance' (Iran Syria Hezbollah Yemen Palestine Iraq) then why do you still obsess, admire, and even become a mouthpiece or spokesman for Putin?.
Syria and Assad have become Putin's subordinates (slaves), look Syria/Assad will do whatever his lord says Putin is like sending Syrian troops to Ukraine. Putin also already has a protégé/agent, namely general Suheil al Hassan (who is always escorted by the Russian Spetsnaz) who will later become a 'puppet' and substitute for Assad.
See Georgia which is not a member of NATO in 2008 its territory of Abkhazia and South Ossetia was annexed by Russia/Putin, now Ukraine's territory is Crimea Luhansk and Donetsk annexed by the greed of Russia/Putin. Even if all the countries in the world join NATO they will never dare to attack Russia because Russia has the largest number of nuclear warheads in the world. So there is no reason to say that Ukraine was attacked by Russia because it wanted to join NATO. Putin Evil should imitate China.
"Russian point of view" you say, then why are you angry with Ukrainian point of view?
Yes Iran In defending against the Iraqi attack, receiving arms aid from the country it hates namely Israel, read this https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel%27s_role_in_the_Iran–Iraq_war
This is no different from Ukraine, to 'survive' they received weapons assistance from the great US Devil.
Wow, your comments on the video show you have been blinded by your fanaticism/obsession with Putin. Maybe even if your child was shot by a Putin soldier you would say "No contextual information is available, or maybe a Putin soldier shot accidentally" poor child.
I actually respect or like some of your thoughts, but about Russia/Putin I'm disappointed in you.
Last edited: