SalarHaqq
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2019
- Messages
- 4,569
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
The Allies did not fear Iran would join the Axis, and their occupation of Iran during WW2 had nothing much to do with this. Iran was observing perfect neutrality. Reza Khan even refused to help Germany when Berlin asked him for assistance in supplying a major popular uprising that was going on against the British in Basra.
That's true. Nuclear weapons aren't indispensable for Iran at this time.
It's probably one of the many bills that are never going to be actually implemented in practice. Quite unfortunately so, I must say, since the internet is a prime instrument of cultural and political subversion in the hands of the zio-American empire (initially, it was a US military application), and therefore it must be kept in check by Iran. There's simply no other way.
- - - - -
Agreed, with two slight exceptions: western countries, let alone Turkey or similar developing societies cannot afford this sort of societal and cultural liberalism either. No sane polity can, since it's a complete violation of natural law and human essence (as conceived by our Creator, the Almighty; those who do not believe in Him would say by nature itself).
Look at how western nations have been culturally uprooted to the core, their populations literally zombified. As for Turkey, any semblance of tradition and patriotism there is more of a mirage - right now the empire still needs Turkey to keep these illusions alive, other than that, the country's largely ready for dissolution into the universal masonic republic. I mean, the Turkish Republic is at its core a product of dönmes (possibly of Sabbatean-Frankist orientation) and freemasons (very present among the Young Turk movement). Its nationalism is a facade, a temporary instument. Professor Necmettin Erbakan might perhaps have brought about some fundamental change, but not Erdogan. No wonder the former was sidelined to the benefit of the latter within the Islamic movement.
The same pathological, apparent schizophrenia could be observed under the shah regime: a nationalist outer appearance, but total and complete control exerted beneath the surface by influential figures affiliated with globalism, anti-national Haifaite Bahaism, zionism and freemasonry. Heck, the shah was forced to ban a book he himself had asked SAVAK operative Esmail Ra'in to author, exposing the identities of (some of the) higher grade freemasons in Iran, including former prime minister Sharif Emami... just goes to show who really was calling the shots back then.
Secondly, Islamic Iran has achieved deterrence against the empire already. Nuclear weapons aren't needed barring some game changing event detrimental to Iran. It's Iran's enemies who are desperate, not knowing how to bring down the Islamic Republic, despite having tried every trick and malice they could realistically resort to. Forty three years of the most intensive efforts, and they have nothing decisive to show for other than some absolutely irrelevant psy-ops points they might have scored with the gullible brainwashed public here and there.
Last edited:
