What's new

Iranian BMs were launched at Ain Assad: Fars News

Yep - the US did the same thing to the Soviets in Afghanistan and they've supported proxy groups and violent dictators overthrowing elected governments all over the world. Iran's democratically elected Mosadegh was overthrown because of the US.

What the Soleimani assassination shows is that the US, Trump specifically, got frustrated at being outplayed by the Iranians in this 'war by proxy' game.

Trump, and the US Establishment, need to reassess how good they are at proxy wars, especially in this part of the world - they lost in Vietnam, lost in Iraq, lost in Syria and have lost in Afghanistan.

well , Massive population was present at Shahid Muhandes funeral in Abadan and Khoramshahr before his body exit Iran and enter Iraq ....

this is source of power ...
 
Last edited:
The U.S is still the strongest country in the world, but the world is changing and the world is more multi polar

Agreed, but the areas in which they are the strongest in world does not guarantee victory for them! All they have is failure and failure.
 
Completely correct.

What's baffles me is surely they must have realised by killing Soleimani, this would not make their miserable record at this proxy war any better. Soleimani was a charismatic face of the qods force, but there are many more like him! Mark my word, things are going to get worse for the Americans now. One thing Iran does not lack are these strategic thinkers like Soleimani.

It was a retarded action

Iran was under strain from sanctions with a portion of the public looking for a reason to protest

All it did was unite Iran, invigorate their resolve and steel their determination

Moronic thinking from the U.S, their is a reason the U.S is losing respect
 
>tells US 5 hours beforehand that they will strike the bases
>all soldiers evacuate
>missiles land, killing 0 soldiers
>country propaganda runs their mouth about "slap in face" and "80 dead US soldiers"(how'd they know, were they there and counting the exact numbers)
>trump tweets all is well(you literally can't lie about soldier deaths in the west as families go on mass protests, look at bush era)
>Iran foreign minister immediately tweets "we don't want war or retaliation"
>This is their severe revenge and red flag hoisting(drama)
>end up shooting down a Ukranian plane, claim didn't shoot it down but at the same time won't hand over blackbox
>People who can see through this bullshit are laughing, only literal idiots are eating up the "80 dead"
Where are you from? Do any country showed balls to attack USA base directly after WWii? Russia? China? Turkey? Pakistan? Name it. No one. So don’t be dumb!
 
Yep - the US did the same thing to the Soviets in Afghanistan and they've supported proxy groups and violent dictators overthrowing elected governments all over the world. Iran's democratically elected Mosadegh was overthrown because of the US.

What the Soleimani assassination shows is that the US, Trump specifically, got frustrated at being outplayed by the Iranians in this 'war by proxy' game.

Trump, and the US Establishment, need to reassess how good they are at proxy wars, especially in this part of the world - they lost in Vietnam, lost in Iraq, lost in Syria and have lost in Afghanistan.
US was just angry at Suleimani for defeating US founded ISIS terrorist group.

There were no proxy activity in Iraq before this incident, but now we will see endless attacks on US forces, Americans opened the gate of hell on themselves.
 
The U.S is still the strongest country in the world, but the world is changing and the world is more multi polar

Other countries are now countering to serve their own interests
There is no doubt that the US can win a conventional war, but then what? Influence isn’t just about pummeling an opposing military force into the ground- you have to deal with the aftermath, And as you said, time have changed. Conflicts don’t end just because the opposing military force has been destroyed.
 
It doesn't make sense. Bush, Obama and even the Israelis didn't target Soleimani because they were afraid of the consequences. If the consequences are 2 bases damaged and 0 casualties. Then I don't see a reason why they didn't do it before. Damage to 2 bases that will probably be rebuilt very soon vs Soleimani is a great bargain.
 
Since this is actually an american site. I am not surprised the American desperate trying to stop more discussion of this missile attack by purposely shut down this website after their big mouth president until now still dare not respond despite US bases being openly hit by missile..

LOL! This isn't China.

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/pakistan-defence-forum-site-not-working.648795/#post-12002484

The Eagle
SENIOR MODERATOR


Forum was down by the Administration for up-gradation process. All is well now. Please continue as usual.

Regards,
 
Last edited:
It doesn't make sense. Bush, Obama and even the Israelis didn't target Soleimani because they were afraid of the consequences. If the consequences are 2 bases damaged and 0 casualties. Then I don't see a reason why they didn't do it before. Damage to 2 bases that will probably be rebuilt very soon vs Soleimani is a great bargain.
this is just overt reaction---a slap to usa what will follow is covert assassinations against US generals to send a message
 
Trump’s motto is shoot first and question later, and we all know the US tend to respond 10x more severely.

I can't see them letting it go without making Trump look weak when he said he will retaliate if the bases or troops are touched.

So, any predictions on Trump's speech?
 
this is just overt reaction---a slap to usa what will follow is covert assassinations against US generals to send a message
risking one US general vs Soleimani is still a great bargain. Nothing not worth risking. Especially back in 2000s when Iran was much weaker than it is now
 
Back
Top Bottom