yavar
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2013
- Messages
- 5,988
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Brother, this is the Sayyad 2/Talash.
if the photo is same as video then you 100% rightBrother, this is the Sayyad 2/Talash.
.
higher quality of that clip, Sayad2:if the photo is same as video then you 100& right
New Recruit
hasn't unveiled yet.In this press tv article it says Ofoq airborne fire control radar!
Whats that?!
http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2016/12/28/503790/Iran-Army-IRGC-Defenders-of-Velayat-Skies
I think the Ofoq can be seen in this photo:
This should be the replacement of the square pair illumination radar of the S-200. That huge static system was split in two as can be seen in the photo. Why using two radar dishes on two different trucks? Well as a FMCW system the transmitting and receiving dishes need to be separated by space or a physical divider like on the square pair. The Iranian solution eliminates the biggest weak point of the S-200, namely its static illumination radar that is prone to ARM attacks.
One other problem of the S-200 is its low agility of its mechanically steered illumination radar. The more modern smaller Iranian solution should hence have a good locking capability, even against agile fighter targets.
This overall S-200 system upgrade called Talash with its Ofoq mobile illumination radar has also a medium range missile, the Sayyad-2. A mobile long range survailance radar such as the 500km Matla ol Fajr 3 VHF-band radar could then be used as a mobile replacement for the static tall king radar of the S-200 making all its components except its long range SAM mobile.
What is missing is the large long range data-link dish of the square pair for this system explanation of mine.
we want B-373 missile launch!
looks like B-373 is still not ready...