What's new

Iranian Air Defense Systems

There are various levels of simulators for sophisticated systems such as S-300, Bavar 373 or any high end aircraft. The first level just being mostly non-dynamic in nature and having all the control panels and displays generated through software and presented to the "Student" on a display... As the student gets familiar with basic operation then they will graduate to higher level (more dynamic) and more realistic simulators. The final level will be actually in a mockup presenting the Command truck with all panels and displays 100% as the actual system with fully dynamic scenario driven events..Instructors presence will be non-intrusive and present at all time. Operators will not touch anything real before passing all levels just as a pilots has to do.
 
These simulators are actually used not only for training purpose...it can be linked to actual air defense network to simulate various scenarios..test different engagement methods and provide different solutions...so you it can be used even in real war situation where it will analyze and simulate different engagement scenarios. This is damn good tool...without these systems you would have to actualy engage in real war scenarios before you can analyze and learn from it. Now it can simulate and analyze scenarios before it happen,And it can do it even in real time....even with all limitation when used in real time scenario still it can provide information that can make difference...So...these simulators are not just some limited training devices...these are very advanced,complex and expensive systems that provide you something,in normal situation you could only get after engagement ...which is still useful for future engagements but enemy may not repeat that same scenario ever again...so having capability to analyze and test different scenarios before engagement or even feed it from real air defense network and literary simulate different outcomes using real time data collected in real time....so crew can choose best location, method and best system to engage enemy...that is priceless
 
sanel1412 said:
These simulators are actually used not only for training purpose...it can be linked to actual air defense network to simulate various scenarios..test different engagement methods and provide different solutions...so you it can be used even in real war situation where it will analyze and simulate different engagement scenarios. This is damn good tool...without these systems you would have to actualy engage in real war scenarios before you can analyze and learn from it. Now it can simulate and analyze scenarios before it happen,And it can do it even in real time....even with all limitation when used in real time scenario still it can provide information that can make difference...So...these simulators are not just some limited training devices...these are very advanced,complex and expensive systems that provide you something,in normal situation you could only get after engagement ...which is still useful for future engagements but enemy may not repeat that same scenario ever again...so having capability to analyze and test different scenarios before engagement or even feed it from real air defense network and literary simulate different outcomes using real time data collected in real time....so crew can choose best location, method and best system to engage enemy...that is priceless
Click to expand...
Well well, aren't you full of information 🤩
 
TheImmortal said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1445881266318938115

Next Israeli weapon to be reverse engineered assuming Israel uses them in Syria and Iranian naval targets (maybe already has been used).

10-30% failure rate with cruise missiles means Iran should get a handful of samples quickly.
Click to expand...
Is this 10-30% failure rate common amongst missile manufacturers. I know some of those Russian Kalibrs failed during flight in Iran, and Iran seems to have a 10-30% failure during flight rate, but I'm curious if other, lets say, higher quality build, more expensive missiles made in the USA or France, South Korea would also have such failure rates.
 
Stryker1982 said:
Is this 10-30% failure rate common amongst missile manufacturers. I know some of those Russian Kalibrs failed during flight in Iran, and Iran seems to have a 10-30% failure during flight rate, but I'm curious if other, lets say, higher quality build, more expensive missiles made in the USA or France, South Korea would also have such failure rates.
Click to expand...

When Russia launched their Kh-101 cruise missiles last year, they were said to have a success rate of around 85%. The American Tomahawks launched during the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq had a success rate of around 80%.

www.google.com

Analysis: The US Navy’s 59 Tomahawk Missile Barrage On A Syrian Airbase

INTRODUCTION During the 1991 Gulf War, the US Navy fired 288 Tomahawk cruise missiles at targets all over Iraq. Fast forward to 2017, 26 years later, not less than 59 tomahawk missiles were fired …
www.google.com www.google.com
 
TheImmortal said:
When Russia launched their Kh-101 cruise missiles last year, they were said to have a success rate of around 85%. The American Tomahawks launched during the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq had a success rate of around 80%.

www.google.com

Analysis: The US Navy’s 59 Tomahawk Missile Barrage On A Syrian Airbase

INTRODUCTION During the 1991 Gulf War, the US Navy fired 288 Tomahawk cruise missiles at targets all over Iraq. Fast forward to 2017, 26 years later, not less than 59 tomahawk missiles were fired …
www.google.com www.google.com
Click to expand...
From 3 French ships which were participated in the missile raid against Syria in 2018, 2 ships failed to launch any MdCN missile, and third ship just managed to fire 3 of them! 94% fail rate.
 
mohsen said:
From 3 French ships which were participated in the missile raid against Syria in 2018, 2 ships failed to launch any MdCN missile, and third ship just managed to fire 3 of them! 94% fail rate.
Click to expand...
and those three hit mountains, the only answer I can give to the dilemma is they need to invest a lot more on their military or it was deliberate and unlike American they really didn't want to participate in the operation
 
Amazing footage of the new short range anti drone sam system in action
https://twitter.com/x/status/1447424844912529412
AD_08 .mp4_000005036.png

AD_08 .mp4_000030237.png
AD_08 .mp4_000050197.png
AD_08 .mp4_000057261.png
AD_08 .mp4_000058263.png
 
Last edited:
Last edited:

Similar threads

D
Israel Breaks Defense Export Record With $13 Billion in 2023
Replies
0
Views
477
dani191
D
Muhammed45
Iranian developed OTH radars
Replies
14
Views
2K
Muhammed45
Muhammed45
Mehdipersian
Russia 'expects' Fateh-110 and Zolfaghar and other missiles from Iran
2 3
Replies
41
Views
4K
aziqbal
aziqbal
Mehdipersian
Russia Eyes Iran's New Cruise Missile with 900-Mile Range
2
Replies
21
Views
3K
Deez Nutz
Deez Nutz
Mehdipersian
Iran to unveil hypersonic missile in near future
2
Replies
28
Views
4K
Mehdipersian
Mehdipersian

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom