Iranian Air Defense Systems

[Oldman1]

+ none of them were a flying wing drone !

Maybe you can teach them how to land after multiple crashes. Hey Pakistanis, you hijacked a dozen drones and have yet to land one intact.

Wasn't that involved with a little firefight.

Yeah Osama died. And the Pakistanis hijacked the helo with your technology.

 

[SOHEIL]

Maybe you can teach them how to land after multiple crashes. Hey Pakistanis, you hijacked a dozen drones and have yet to land one intact.



Yeah Osama died. And the Pakistanis hijacked the helo with your technology.

It seems you don't know anything about ossama case !!!

The helly which downed by a MANPAD destroyed by American troops ... Only tale survived from the explosion ...

And is there any similarity between these two incidents !?

RQ-170 hijacked from the high altitude without any hard action ...

A piece ... Not in one piece !

 

[Hack-Hook]

A UAV is not a "Khompaareh Salavati", and it has control systems which make them enable to land with low damages, even in the worst cases.

The control system need electricity and without that it can't do shit.and there is only one source of providing electricity in that UAV
And again you guys are insulting American intelligence by claiming they designed this secret spy plane so it will land in the enemy land intact .

 

[SajeevJino]

Humiliation of your air defence systerm.

That's not the Correct answer for that Question ..Between Israel facing Many no of Spies in His Land ..But Survived each and every Attack They faced ..and The Attacker get what the Drone Gets

 

[Falcon29]

That's not the Correct answer for that Question ..Between Israel facing Many no of Spies in His Land ..But Survived each and every Attack They faced ..and The Attacker get what the Drone Gets

We're back with this queer avatar BS ....

 

[MOHSENAM]

We're back with this queer avatar BS ....

 

[Falcon29]

His avatar is messed up and gay.

 

[The SC]

Bunch of off-topic rants from another Iranian member in this thread. parts of your comment is not comprehendible because of your english language, but, anyway, I don't have time, nor this thread is appropriate to answer your bogus claims. but, just notice that a powerful nation does not knee down before its enemy to receive 4 billion dollars for six months. Just try to wake up from the imaginary dreamland that you have created for yourself in your mind.

So Qaher-313 is on topic , and asking you to stop your rants is off topic.

You have learned some tricks from the Zionists, like jumping from a defensive position to an offensive one by attacking Iran again for its diplomacy this time, this just shows how ignorant you are of the real balanced situation.
I am glad you have learned some English in the US, but that does not save you from your cave like mentality, that is why you find my English unaccessible to your limited comprehension.

 

[Oldman1]

It seems you don't know anything about ossama case !!!

The helly which downed by a MANPAD destroyed by American troops ... Only tale survived from the explosion ...

And is there any similarity between these two incidents !?

RQ-170 hijacked from the high altitude without any hard action ...

View attachment 34080

A piece ... Not in one piece !

What MANPAD? The Taliban didn't claim to shoot it down. Nor did Al Qaeda or the Pakistanis. Only conclusion is Pakistani hijacking it with Iranian tech. And RQ170 did crashed with its wings sheared off and had to be put back together with duct tape and glue as your pics have shown. So yeah they are similar where they crashed in pieces.

 

[Hack-Hook]

What MANPAD? The Taliban didn't claim to shoot it down. Nor did Al Qaeda or the Pakistanis. Only conclusion is Pakistani hijacking it with Iranian tech. And RQ170 did crashed with its wings sheared off and had to be put back together with duct tape and glue as your pics have shown. So yeah they are similar where they crashed in pieces.

that's not a sign of crash , that's a sign of bad landing in rough terrain

 

[mohsen]

What MANPAD? The Taliban didn't claim to shoot it down. Nor did Al Qaeda or the Pakistanis. Only conclusion is Pakistani hijacking it with Iranian tech. And RQ170 did crashed with its wings sheared off and had to be put back together with duct tape and glue as your pics have shown. So yeah they are similar where they crashed in pieces.

those wings were separated by Iranian troops to ease the transportation.

you seriously think these fine cuts are the result of crash???

 

[SOHEIL]

What MANPAD? The Taliban didn't claim to shoot it down. Nor did Al Qaeda or the Pakistanis. Only conclusion is Pakistani hijacking it with Iranian tech. And RQ170 did crashed with its wings sheared off and had to be put back together with duct tape and glue as your pics have shown. So yeah they are similar where they crashed in pieces.

For real !?

 

[Oldman1]

those wings were separated by Iranian troops to ease the transportation.

you seriously think these fine cuts are the result of crash???

Where do you think the wings are at connected to the fuselage, of course they be weaker at? Have you ever considered why they never showed a video or picture of the aircraft intact before cutting the wings as you claimed? Or never showed the landing gear when they first showed it on tv? Up close you can see damaged parts on the wings. You guys are really bad at cutting it if you damage the wings like that.

For real !?

For real. How else would Pakistan get a dozen Predator drones to crash?

 

[Hack-Hook]

Where do you think the wings are at connected to the fuselage, of course they be weaker at? Have you ever considered why they never showed a video or picture of the aircraft intact before cutting the wings as you claimed? Or never showed the landing gear when they first showed it on tv? Up close you can see damaged parts on the wings. You guys are really bad at cutting it if you damage the wings like that.

For real. How else would Pakistan get a dozen Predator drones to crash?

are those marks belong to falling from 10km or it's sign of landing in a rough terrain

 

[Behrooz Boonabi]

are those marks belong to falling from 10km or it's sign of landing in a rough terrain

If it fell 10Km, it would be just a pile of debris. It looks more like it was taken control of but they didn't know how to properly land it as they have never flown one at that point.


Also, they might of landed it without using a runway. It could have also been damaged when moving it or dissembling it for safety concerned.

Where do you think the wings are at connected to the fuselage, of course they be weaker at? Have you ever considered why they never showed a video or picture of the aircraft intact before cutting the wings as you claimed? Or never showed the landing gear when they first showed it on tv? Up close you can see damaged parts on the wings. You guys are really bad at cutting it if you damage the wings like that.

For real. How else would Pakistan get a dozen Predator drones to crash?

Where do you think the wings are at connected to the fuselage, of course they be weaker at? Have you ever considered why they never showed a video or picture of the aircraft intact before cutting the wings as you claimed? Or never showed the landing gear when they first showed it on tv? Up close you can see damaged parts on the wings. You guys are really bad at cutting it if you damage the wings like that.

I have never worked on a drone that didn't have removable wings.

For real. How else would Pakistan get a dozen Predator drones to crash?[/quote]


It doesn't look like it crashed.