What's new

Iran warns India on gas (IPI) pipeline

Omar1984

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 12, 2008
Messages
12,296
Reaction score
0

Iran's ambassador in India says Delhi must decide soon on a multi-billion dollar gas pipeline deal or else they will talk to other countries.

Iran's ambassador in India Seyed Mehdi Nabizedeh said they were willing to offer India a limited time.

The pipeline will transport gas from Iran to India through Pakistan, and is seen as crucial to Indian energy needs.

Iran and Pakistan signed the deal in May this year. Reports say China is also interested in being a part of it.

Analysts say the pipeline could contribute to regional security as Iran, Pakistan and India would depend on each other more.

The deal has been stalled by disputes over transit fees and security issues.

'Not unlimited'

"We went ahead with Pakistan and signed the agreement. But India can still be part of it. But I have told this before also that this time limit is not unlimited," news agency Reuters quoted Mr Nabizedeh as saying.

The Iranian ambassador also confirmed that China was interested in the agreement.

"Yes it is true [that China has shown interest in the deal]. We hope that this tripartite agreement is settled soon so that we do not have to talk with anyone else," he said.

The 2,600-km (1,620-mile) pipeline would initially transport 60 million cubic metres of gas (2.2bn cubic feet) a day.

The Indian government has said the project is feasible, but needs to be financially viable with assured supplies.

India has boycotted trilateral meetings since mid-2007, saying it wants to resolve the issues of transit fees and transportation tariffs with its long-standing regional rival Pakistan first.

Last year, India's Petroleum Minister Murli Deora had said they were very close to signing the deal.
 
China interested in IPI, India can rejoin: Iranian envoy

NEW DELHI: With India going slow on the tri-nation gas pipeline, Iranian ambassador to India Seyed Mehdi Nabizadeh Tuesday said China is interested
in the proposed multi-billion project but left the door open for New Delhi to rejoin the peace pipeline.

The Iranian envoy, however, remained quiet on whether Iran is holding talks with China over the tri-nation pipeline involving Iran, India and Pakistan.

The envoy invited India to rejoin the pipeline project but made it clear that the offer was not for the "unlimited period".

"Work on the project is progressing very fast and one should understand the urgency to join the pipeline," the envoy told reporters here when asked whether Iran is setting any time frame for India to rejoin the project.

India has not officially quit the project, but has serious reservations about its viability due to differences over the pricing of the Iranian gas and security of the pipeline that will pass though violence-prone areas of Pakistan.

Early this month, Petroleum Minister Murli Deora denied reports that India has quit plans to build the gas pipeline with Iran and Pakistan. "With Iran the question is still open, but because of the political situation in Pakistan, just now there is a little bit of a stop on that," he had said.

The project, termed as the peace pipeline due to its potential to bring together the three countries and spread prosperity in the region, was signed by Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on the sidelines of the tripartite summit on Afghanistan security in Tehran in May.

China interested in IPI, India can rejoin: Iranian envoy- Oil & Gas-Energy-News By Industry-News-The Economic Times


India news article says India is worried about security of the pipeline that it will pass through "violence-prone" areas, let me remind them that the Islamabad-Tehran-Istanbul railway will pass through the same areas.
 
Hopefully Indian power politics can be pushed aside and India changes its mind.
This will greatly strengthen regional ties based on mutual need.

The railway project is the same. Hopefully things can work out for the better.
 
India news article says India is worried about security of the pipeline that it will pass through "violence-prone" areas, let me remind them that the Islamabad-Tehran-Istanbul railway will pass through the same areas.

You and i both know that , India media is far to sensationalist when it comes to foreign policy. better to just ignore sometimes.
they will say anything and report anything,
The only thing i like is that they keep our political babu's in check.

And security concerns or not its just power politics to lower prices to a more favorable position. I hope India can accept this deal, it would benefit regional security greatly. as well as fuel India's energy need for the next 20 years.:cheers:

But frankly i want the India-Pakistan "Ran of kutch" solar field project to be a reality. This can demonstrate how even through both sides are deeply rooted with mis-trust they can come together to to save the planet. a strong sentiment in my opinion
 
Energy - Energy security - are, analysts suggest, the primary criteria for foreign policy makers in Inda. Some have suggested that India have miscalucated by putting a major portion of their "eggs" in the American nuclear power basket - however; India have considerable technical prowess and have the ability to "absorb" technical and manufacturing know how, it may just turn out that putting a major portion of their energyh "eggs" in the American nuclear power basket will have been a huge plus - where as much of the world will still be using fossil fuels and where as India's immediate neighbors, in particular Pakistan, will be using fossil fuel to enable a strategic shift in it's economy, India may be able to empower a "leap frog" in strategic terms of it's economy and better position it, for the coming "green" technological revolutions.
 
it's pointless to talk to indian....they backed out of the deal due to pressure, and because americans have offered them civilian nuclear energy deal.


We should move on. There is MUCH MUCH more to gain if energy hungry China joins the deal, and they seem very eager to join (as per recent reports).

I-P-C pipeline should be the new reality.....forget indian.
 
it's pointless to talk to indian....they backed out of the deal due to pressure, and because americans have offered them civilian nuclear energy deal.


We should move on. There is MUCH MUCH more to gain if energy hungry China joins the deal, and they seem very eager to join (as per recent reports).

I-P-C pipeline should be the new reality.....forget indian.

Some old Articles but worth considering in respect of Iran's Natural Gas, as Gas by Pipeline or in LNG form :

LNG Shortages Are Building Up; Iran & Russia Struggle To Match Qatar JVs:.

Lower oil prices affecting the market value of LNG and a global credit crunch have combined to cause promoters of new LNG export ventures to postpone or even cancel such projects. As a result, a shortage of LNG on both sides of Suez will be building up in the coming years. The spot price of LNG exceeded $21/m BTU in September; but it has since fallen by more than 50%. For their part, Iran and Russia are struggling to over-take - or even match - Qatar's LNG export capacity which is the largest in the world.

In its World Energy Outlook 2008 out recently, the IEA says: "Shortfalls in the availability of LNG could push up prices and encourage the faster development of indigenous resources in importing regions". Up to 2012 there will be a "massive expansion in LNG supply". Any new surge in investment in LNG production is unlikely to increase output of the fuel before 2015 because of the time needed to build the liquefaction trains. The shortage could occur earlier.

World-wide LNG flows have doubled in the past decade and now meet 7% of total world demand for natural gas. The volume of LNG trade will rise to 340 BCM/year in 2015 and 680 BCM/year in 2030. It was 201 BCM/year in 2006. This surge in LNG trading will be led by demand in the EU, where indigenous gas production is declining.

By 2030, the EU will depend on gas imports through LNG ships and pipelines, to meet 86% of demand. The IEA says EU gas imports will rise to 580 BCM/year by 2030 from 305 BCM/y in 2006. Most of the additional export volumes in the period to 2030 will come from the Middle East and Africa.

Iran has at least four different LNG export ventures for a total capacity of almost 50m t/y. It has been promoting them since the 1990s and is likely to keep struggling to have at least one of them off the ground. But a combination of US, EU and UNSC sanctions have rendered these and other energy-related Iranian JVs un-bankable. Without a US liquefaction process, which Tehran cannot get, none of its LNG ventures is likely to materialise.

Yet Tehran last week announced it was about to sign a multi-billion-dollar agreement with the state-owned China National Petroleum Corp (CNPC) as part of a drive to revitalise its LNG plans. Officials from the state-owned National Iranian Oil Co. (NIOC) and CNPC were on Nov. 28 quoted as saying talks were at an advanced stage - part of a renewed push towards attracting fresh investment to the Shi'ite theocracy's embattled energy sector.


NIOC Deputy Director For Investment Hojatollah Ghanimi-Fard said a deal with CNPC to have a stake in Phase-11 of the offshore South Pars gas field and a share in the associated Pars LNG consortium, was imminent. He added: "We will make an announcement to the market shortly with respect to CNPC. There are also talks ongoing with other partners, which we hope to conclude within the next month". MEED on Nov. 28 quoted a CNPC executive as saying the talks remained at a sensitive stage, but that they were likely to be concluded within weeks, adding: "We are looking at a number of options for stakes in these projects but there is still work to do on the [finance] side, given the current economic climate".

Under the proposed deal, CNPC will take at least 25% and operating rights on Phase-11 of the South Pars field along-side the JV's existing share-holders, Petronas of Malaysia and Total of France. CNPC is likely to secure a smaller stake as part of the Pars LNG consortium, which aims to produce 10m t/y of LNG from Phase-11 of the field. Under the consortium's ownership structure, NIOC holds 50%, Total has 30% and Petronas has 20%. If CNPC is to join the group, either NIOC or Total are expected to lower their share-holdings in Pars LNG, but Petronas is expected to retain its full interest in the project.

Uncertainty, however, still surrounds Total's role in the projects. In May, Total told Tehran it could not commit to the development of Iran's energy industry because of US-led sanctions, caused its nuclear and regional ambitions.

Work is continuing on the Iran LNG project, a further 10.8m t/y JV, which is 49% owned by NIOC's unit National Iranian Gas Export Co (NIGEC), with two NIOC pension funds sharing the remaining 51%. WorleyParsons of Australia is carrying out work on the front-end engineering and design (FEED), while some engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) work is understood to be in the preliminary stages. In December 2007, China's other state-owned group Sinopec signed a deal to develop the Yadavaran oilfield in Iran to boost output to 200,000 b/d, from 85,000 b/d, while the state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp (CNOOC) is negotiating a $16 bn integrated E&P/LNG project to develop the North Pars gas field and export the gas in LNG form to China.

Iran previously sought help from neighbouring Arab Gulf Co-operation Council (GCC) states for up to $20 bn in private investment in its LNG projects after major international oil companies (IOCs) claimed UNSC sanctions were stopping them from investing. The Iranian Petroleum Ministry says major IOCs may be retained for technical services. But a compromise may be found by injecting funds from GCC investors, to ensure the projects go ahead.

However, none of the six GCC states or their major investors would respond to repeated Iranian efforts to secure their support for their LNG projects. Even Kuwait, keen on importing LNG and about to commit capital for the construction of an LNG-receiving and re-gasification terminal in the emirate, has declined to respond favourably to the Iranian proposal.

Tehran has rejected a proposal for South Pars gas to be piped to the tiny emirate's Ras Laffan liquefaction centre for export in LNG form. Qatar is the world's biggest exporter of LNG, with plans to expand its LNG export capacity to 83m t/y by 2015 or before. By then, Qatar will have become the world's biggest exporters of NGLs, as well, with up to 14m t/y to be allocated for the purpose.

The Russian business daily Kommersant recently quoted an un-named Russian official as saying that Gazprom, Qatar Liquefied Gas Co. Ltd. and NIOC aimed to set up a venture to produce gas from South Pars and liquefy it at Ras Laffan. But Oil Minister Gholam-Hossein Nozari said: "We have agreed to set up a joint company to develop projects in the three countries or any other place in the world, but we do not accept that Iran's gas will be exported to Qatar to be turned into LNG. The Islamic Republic agrees that Qatar and Russia will invest in South Pars and the LNG will be produced in Iran on partnership basis".

This reflects national pride, with Qatar regarded as being too small on which Iran to depend. There is the more complicated issue of South Part being part of Qatar's North Field - an offshore super-giant with the world's biggest reserves of natural gas. Qatar has repeatedly turned down Iranian requests for a joint development of both the North Field and South Pars. But in recent years, Tehran has been accusing Qatar of damaging the South Pars reservoirs by its "excessive" extraction of gas from the North Field.

+++++

Iran has made several Agreements with China for supply of LNG as Early as March 2004. Here is one of them :

China signs LNG contract with Iran.(LNG)(liquefied natural gas)

China Chemical Reporter, March, 2004

Zhuhai Zhenrong, one of four government-backed crude oil importers in China, has agreed to buy more than 110 million tons of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from Iran over 25 years, which could be the largest LNG purchase deal in the world.

The company signed a framework agreement earlier this month to buy 2.5 million tons of LNG annually from Iran starting in 2008, the company announced in a statement posted on the website of the State Assets Supervision and Administration Commission on March 17.


The imports are expected to increase to 5 million tons a year starting in 2013. The contract is drawn up for 25 years.

The deal, worth more than an estimated US$20 billion, reflects China's growing appetite to secure enough energy from overseas to...

+++++

Iran, China sign LNG deal: 12/1/06

TEHRAN, Dec. 1 (Mehr News Agency) — Iran's Pars LNG Company and PetroChina Company signed a deal on Iranian LNG sales to China, a senior Iranian official said in Tehran on Friday.

"Under the contract that was signed here last Tuesday night, the Chinese company will buy 3 million tons of liquefied natural gas (LNG) annually from Iran," official news agency IRNA quoted the managing director of the National Iranian Gas Export Company (NIGEC) as saying.

Nosratollah Seifi explained that the exchange is determined based on crude oil daily price. "However, the formula can be revised to moderate the price over different periods," he added.

The official further said that the contract was signed in the presence of a high-ranking delegation of officials from Chinese oil companies affiliated to the China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC).

On the Pars LNG Company, Seifi explained that Iran, French Total, and Malaysian Petronas are the stockholders of the company. "It is in charge of Pars LNG Project, one of Iran's three main projects to produce LNG," he added.

He noted that Pars LNG, Iran's first ever and largest integrated oil and industrial project is close to Final Investment Decision (FID), expected to be implemented from mid 2007 on.

Meanwhile, the managing director of the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) on Friday said that Iran is holding talks with three Chinese companies over LNG sales.

Gholam-Hossein Nozari added that negotiations are concurrent. "But, final agreements are yet to be reached," Mehr News Agency reported him as saying.

+++++

Here is one about China not willing to buy Iranian LNG as “Price too high”!

Iran, China Strike Oil and Gas Deal

By: AP | 14 Sep 2007 | 11:59 AM

Iran's interior minister said Friday his country has finalized oil and gas projects with China, adding that two-way trade was on target to hit $20 billion (14.4 billion euros) this year among robust commercial ties.

Speaking to reporters after meetings in Beijing, Mostafa Pour Mohammadi gave few details but indicated progress had been made. "We have many big projects on the table," Pour Mohammadi said.

"And in my talks and sessions we finalized our parts and projects in oil fields, gas fields and investing and transporting of fuel between the two countries," the minister said.

Economic ties covered areas ranging from power station construction and mining to the building of subways and automobile plants.

"This year, trade will hit $20 billion (14.4 billion euros) and will develop in other fields," Pour Mohammadi said.

Despite the minister's comments, energy deals between Iran and China have repeatedly been held up over price and revenue sharing.

China Petroleum & Chemical Corp., best known as Sinopec, said in April it does not plan to buy liquefied natural gas from Iran because the price is too high, but that it was discussing other cooperation.

China is scrambling to meet its growing energy needs, and Sinopec had earlier held talks about purchasing LNG from Iran, which has the world's second largest natural gas reserves.

Tehran has also been at odds with China's Sinopec over the development of the Yadavaran oil field because the company wanted a 15 percent return, and Iran something lower, the managing director of the National Iranian Oil Company, Gholam Hussein Nozari, told the official IRNA news agency in January.

While the United States is on a concerted campaign to discourage foreign energy companies from doing business in Iran, analysts say Iran's investment woes are its own fault because it fails to offer enticing deals.


© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed

++++

As such let us know when China takes Natural Gas from Iran in the form of LNG or by a Pipeline via Pakistan.

It shall be good news and is worth waiting for.
 
Pipeline: Iran could ditch India for China

NEW DELHI: As India continues to flip-flop over the issue of the Iran-Pakistan-India (IPI) peace pipeline, Iran on Wednesday warned that it will not
wait indefinitely for India to join the project and suggested that it might instead consider China as Beijing has evinced interest in the pipeline.

Iranian ambassador Seyed Mehdi Nabizedeh said that it is important to understand the urgency to initiate work on the pipeline.

While petroleum minister Murli Deora recently denied reports that India has pulled out of the project, it is unlikely that New Delhi will agree to buy gas from Tehran through the proposed 3,000-km pipeline any time soon because of security and transit fee issues. Iran's growing alienation because of its nuclear ambitions and India's proximity to the US have further contributed to New Delhi's reluctance.

With India not taking any decision, Iran and Pakistan decided to go ahead with the project in May this year. "We waited long for India and expected that India and Pakistan would resolve the bottlenecks but that didn't happen and we went ahead to sign the agreement with Pakistan. We believe India still has an opportunity to be a part of the project, but it must be said that time is running out fast," said Nabizedeh.

The ambassador, however, avoided a direct reply when questioned whether or not Iran had started negotiations with China. "It is true (that China has shown interest). We hope that this tripartite agreement is settled soon so that we do not have to talk with anyone else," he stated.

It must be mentioned here that Pakistan foreign minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi had recently said that the IPI pipeline could turn into IPC (Iran-Pakistan-China) pipeline.

Pakistani ambassador to Iran Muhammad Bux Abbasi had earlier been quoted in `Tehran Times' as saying that India is out of the pipeline deal, but it was denied soon after by Deora. "With Iran the question is still open, but because of the political situation in Pakistan, just now there is a little bit of a stop on that," said Deora.

Pipeline: Iran could ditch India for China - India - NEWS - The Times of India
 
Pakistan snubs west pressure on Iran pipeline


Pakistan has discarded any opposition to the Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline project from western capitals and insisted on following the Peace Pipeline schedule.

Iran and Pakistan agreed in principle to complete a long awaited multi-billion-dollar gas pipeline project by 2013.

The agreement was reached in an operational-level meeting between the two sides on August 31.

Mahmood Salim Mahmood, Secretary of Pakistan’s Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources told reporters the two countries would initiate the project as it was scheduled.

“The deal will be launched according to its timetable,” he said. “It does not allow the Pakistani government to sell imported gas from Iran to a third party.”

“Pakistan plans to generate 4,600 megawatts of electricity with Iranian natural gas,” he added.

While Pakistan has been facing an electricity shortfall of more than 3,000 megawatts leading to frequent and lengthy blackouts in the country, it has been under pressure from Washington to abandon the deal.

The 2,600-kilometer (1,615-mile) gas pipeline was originally proposed to transfer Iran’s gas to the Indian subcontinent.

Although currently Pakistan and Iran are the sole signatories to the gas deal, Islamabad says that India can join the project later on.


tehran times : Pakistan snubs west pressure on Iran pipeline
 
it's pointless to talk to indian....they backed out of the deal due to pressure, and because americans have offered them civilian nuclear energy deal.


We should move on. There is MUCH MUCH more to gain if energy hungry China joins the deal, and they seem very eager to join (as per recent reports).

I-P-C pipeline should be the new reality.....forget indian.

If India backed off bcoz of Americans pressure or not Natural Gas is a non renewable energy while Nuclear energy can be reused depends on the sophistication of technology. Nuclear energy is much cleaner than fossil fuels, my friend, why did u think Iran is determined to go nuclear by pissing of every nations? bcoz they know its the only way ahead as of now and this natural gas is not going to last long. from 50yrs from now, this pipe line could be useless u realize that?
 
If India backed off bcoz of Americans pressure or not Natural Gas is a non renewable energy while Nuclear energy can be reused depends on the sophistication of technology. Nuclear energy is much cleaner than fossil fuels, my friend, why did u think Iran is determined to go nuclear by pissing of every nations? bcoz they know its the only way ahead as of now and this natural gas is not going to last long. from 50yrs from now, this pipe line could be useless u realize that?


We need energy now, the economy needs to grow today not 10 years from now. The demand for power goes up something like 10% a year, no country, let alone India can forgo the use of fossil fuels. We can never meet our demand with nuclear power alone.

India is stalling on the IPI, not because of American pressure, but mainly due to our tense relationship with Pakistan. There's too much that could go wrong with the pipeline, Pakistan can and will abuse it's new found leverage. If and when we come to depend on the gas flowing through Pakistan, they could hold our economy hostage. The situation in Pakistan is still evolving and there is much room for instability. Gas pipelines are regularly targeted in Balochistan. Then there is the ever present specter of war over a devastating terrorist attack. In a word, Kashmir.

There is much both countries could gain from such a relationship, but there is simply no hope for reconciliation. Both countries will have to forgo billions of dollars and be played against each other by foreigners. After more than 60 years, 4 wars, and a perpetual cold war, we will never have peace. In other words, the pipeline isn't feasible.

India's only feasible option is the sea route and so much work has been done to upgrade and expand our merchant navy. AFAIK India is also looking into undersea transmission lines from Iran. In time, India can make this an economically viable, hassle free alternative. All the necessary sectors are growing, manufacturing, exports, shipping. Of course a pipeline would be the best case scenario, but we have to work with what we have.
 
If India backed off bcoz of Americans pressure or not Natural Gas is a non renewable energy while Nuclear energy can be reused depends on the sophistication of technology. Nuclear energy is much cleaner than fossil fuels, my friend, why did u think Iran is determined to go nuclear by pissing of every nations? bcoz they know its the only way ahead as of now and this natural gas is not going to last long. from 50yrs from now, this pipe line could be useless u realize that?

You do realize that if a country the size of India goes nuclear in order to meet even 30% of its energy requirements it shall be storing a huge amount of high and low level radioactive byproducts and spent fuel which is a very big liability in itself.
Most of the byproducts remain radioactive for thousands of years and reusing the spent fuel is a costly option; even if spent fuel is reused there are still radioactive byproducts which need to be taken care of...the world has yet to see a resolution to this problem...everyone hopes they shall solve it in time...

Rejecting fossil fuel energy is not something India should be doing...
Best thing is to have as much diversity as possible.

Iran is going nuclear to both prove their mettle as a modern nation and to have the option of at least something in pipeline to threaten the likes of Israel.
Iran can easily meet its energy requirements for at least 200 to 300 years and by that time, i am confident that solar energy will be extremely cheap and much more efficient.

Anyways it does seem that the pipeline will be beneficial for India from energy diversity perspective and if India is not interested then it has been offered something much more sweeter...time will tell
 
a sea route from Iran to india is financially unfeasible.

attacks on pipeline cause damage that takes less than 45 minutes to repair. The real problem is india thinking her ego will be shattered by paying Pakistan transit fees.

it was also under U.S. pressure that india backed away from the deal. The deal was being talked about for almost a decade now. It was only recently that US offered india the technology, at which point they backed out of the pipeline deal.


like i said --- it is zero loss for Pakistan or Iran. Iranians problem was that they took so long to come up with a price mechanism. But now that issue is solved, we'll be getting gas at 80% the market-going rate.

We have our own huge fields of untapped natural gas, but companies will not invest in the drilling/pumping infrastructure because of ongoing political situation. Inshallah things will settle down in the next year or so. The argentinians are eager to invest in Pakistani gas.


Until then, I-P-C pipeline is a reality I really hope to see. Inshallah ho jayga.
 
a sea route from Iran to india is financially unfeasible.

attacks on pipeline cause damage that takes less than 45 minutes to repair. The real problem is india thinking her ego will be shattered by paying Pakistan transit fees.

it was also under U.S. pressure that india backed away from the deal. The deal was being talked about for almost a decade now. It was only recently that US offered india the technology, at which point they backed out of the pipeline deal.

like i said --- it is zero loss for Pakistan or Iran. Iranians problem was that they took so long to come up with a price mechanism. But now that issue is solved, we'll be getting gas at 80% the market-going rate.

We have our own huge fields of untapped natural gas, but companies will not invest in the drilling/pumping infrastructure because of ongoing political situation. Inshallah things will settle down in the next year or so. The argentinians are eager to invest in Pakistani gas.

Until then, I-P-C pipeline is a reality I really hope to see. Inshallah ho jayga.

1. A Deep Sea Pipeline is feasible as two deep sea pipelines are already in operation – one is in over 2,000 Metres Depth of Water.

2. Believe me a Pipe Line Rupture (intentional or from unknown causes) would take days if not weeks to repair.

3. Stop deluding yourself. India’s putting matters on hold is not due to USA but due to the price of the LNG being about USD 10.00 per MMBTU – basis an oil price of USD 70 per bbl. Present “spot” prices are about USD 4 per MMBTU

4. The other reason for India putting matters on hold is the present “Security” Situation as well as the inimical relations between India and Pakistan (I am neither criticising one nor the other).

I agree that the USA has a hold on India for Nuclear Power but it is limited as India isn’t begging for Hundreds upon Hundreds of Billions of US Dollars in various forms.

5. India using the Railway connection from Bangladesh to Turkey Railway via Pakistan and Iran will carry may be Twenty or even Forty Containers from India which if impounded during a Three to Four Week India-Pakistan War is no big deal.

Non-availability of Natural Gas for even a day will cause Havoc not only to Industrial users but also to domestic users.

I would also request you to read my reply to your post #6.
 
one geological problem of this ipc project is that it is very hard to pump the gas to an altitude of 5000 meters in the pipe and to cross the ice cold karakurum pass.

another problem has much to do with the unstable frontier of pakistan.

but if this pipe line success, it will greatly increase the regional pease and stability.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom